TheMouth
-
Posts
299 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by TheMouth
-
I just hate that he was using " association " to justify the shot...simply because the rules didnt null hands and fingers, he associated it as part of the arm...even though a hand is a hand. Its actually ticked me off enough that if he tries it again I am going to say no. I think he needs to read the dictionary definition of what an arm is.
-
it was the thumb off the jump pack chaplain...he could only see it due to the laser pointer we use in games shinning on that one part. Though maybe i could have busted out with the "light bends" and hopefully get out of it. :D
-
okay well, I am not using the jump chaplain AGAIN.
-
hmmm...that brings a good point out.
-
I ask this question because the guy I play against used that reasoning to wipe out my assault squad, simply because my chaplain's ( jump pack model ) thumb was visible. edit : His reasoning was that the rulebook was specific : head, torso, legs, arms, and that the thumb is attached to the hand, and thats attached to the arm. I debated this , simply because of the fact that that it wasnt the arm, it was the thumb, and there is a further exception to the rule in the fact that wings and tails do not count as part of the model. Even though they are "attached" to the torso.
-
According to the rulebook, you can shoot at a model ( infantry ) if you can see the arms, the head, torso , andthe legs, but not if all you see is a weapon or standard ect. If you can see just a thumb, yes literally a thumb, can you still shoot at that unit?