Anyone use lesser daemons?

[Roultox]

Hmm how should I cut down the whole "Icon" thing.

 

Alright first off. Things that belong to you are yours, and what belongs to the enemy are the enemies. Just like only he can move his models, rolls for his shots and armor saves, and so on. His icons are his icons, and thus you recieve no benefits for those icons being on the table. So technicly they dont exist to you.

 

If the same concept for wording of all rules in the game as trying to use an opponents icon to summon your daemons, here's what would happen.

 

1:Teleport Homer- Anything with teleport homer capabilities (Including icons, they say terminator armored models) can be deployed against the enemy.

2:Lash of submission says "The chaos player" - thus any chaos player may move the unit in the duration of the power's effect until every model is moved. That means that if both sides were chaos players, then its a rush who can touch every model first and say it was moved.

3:Including the example above, any wording where it says "This army types player" will include all players in the game of the same army controlling type to do what it mentions in the rule.

 

RAW is fine, and thusly cannot be applied to everything.

[Seahawk]

What about C:CD, which says for certain effects that all models, friend or foe, on the table are affected?

 

Codex Eldar also has a foible, with the Avatar causing both Eldar players' units to become fearless.

 

I think it would make sense in all cases, even daemons coming from the wrong army. Apparently they did the ritual of summoning very poorly, and some po'd daemons are coming out to kill them because they mispronounced something instead. Without any special rules to differentiate them, it doesn't become unbalanced in my opinion.