Retinues in C:SM 5th?

[Steelmage99]

Calling/writing GW is useless for rules querries, different people answering at different times will give different answers.

(This is why you see people ignore or laugh at posts that base an argument around "I called the rulezboyz"

 

GW has also been considerate enough recently to be sure to mention that their "Official FAQs" aren't actually official, and should simply be treated as a set of house rules players may use if they so choose.

 

Things have changed, Hexx.

 

Rules queries are now sent to Askyourquestion@games-workshop.com. One man, John Turner, answers and so far he has show remarkable consistency. Dakka did a test and he was very consistent.

 

I am not saying that he is some kind of Oracle, just that John Turner is now a good indication of how future FAQs will be worded.

[Playa]

Hey,

 

Things have changed

 

Right. I'll believe it when I believe it . . .

 

It's been apparent for many editions that new RBs cause two problems -

 

* Learning new rules, and

* Unlearning old ones

 

That second point is the real backbreaker.

It's tough, and yet it happens *every edition*.

I think we can be more tolerant of players struggling up that curve -

 

If it's a rule, it's in the book. If it ain't, it ain't.

Cite your ref and we'll debate the terminology.

Imo, that's what these rules fora are all about.

 

A simple not-in-Kansas-anymore reminder will help the Unlearn Challenged -

If the word Retinue doesn't appear in C:SM, there are no SM Retinues.

QED.

 

 

Peace, Brothers.

 

 

Playa