Brent Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 Greetings, brothers- Has there been any kind of ruling on whether or not Terminators still have the 5+ Invulnerable Save? It's in the summary chart in the 5th edition rulebook, but I don't see it in the new SM codex.... Thanks, Brent Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/149207-terminators-still-have-5-invulnerable-save/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarpSpawn Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 Page 102 of the new codex, under the heading of "Terminator Armour". They most definitely do get the inv save. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/149207-terminators-still-have-5-invulnerable-save/#findComment-1732895 Share on other sites More sharing options...
hagg Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 check out the armory on page 102 there you will find if you have the german codex, they have forgotten to write it into it. you should then check outthe erratas atthegerman GW website :D ~hagg Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/149207-terminators-still-have-5-invulnerable-save/#findComment-1732899 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brent Posted October 15, 2008 Author Share Posted October 15, 2008 Thank you, brothers. [brings heel of hand to forehead smartly, grunts] I should've found that.... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/149207-terminators-still-have-5-invulnerable-save/#findComment-1732913 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinyRhino Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 Don't feel bad. I panicked when I didn't see the Deep Strike special rule under the Terminator squad army listing, but then found it under the armor description. Same with Assault squads and their jump packs. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/149207-terminators-still-have-5-invulnerable-save/#findComment-1733113 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.