Jump to content

Compulsory Rapid Fire


Sully ad Bellum

Recommended Posts

Hey, I was reading 5th ed. (for the first time) and I noticed this nifty paragraph on page 27:

 

"f a model does fire, it...cannot reduce its weapon's firepower (for example, it cannot fire only two shots from its Heavy 3 weapon)."

 

Does this mean that Rapid Fire weapons, if fired, MUST fire twice up to 12 inches?

 

Does that make rapid-firing plasma guns a riskier prospect? Or would any such risk be counteracted by the rule that "Gets Hot" weapons now overheat only on 1s (as opposed to multiple-shots overheating on 1s and 2s)?

 

Would such a "mandatory rapid fire" rule be a new rule, or was it that way in 4th ed. too?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/152194-compulsory-rapid-fire/
Share on other sites

odds are now 13% that you will roll a gets hot for each shot. they were 33%. (and I rounded up)

 

odds are 66% that you will save, either way - 6% chance of taking a wound from each shot fired - so 11% in rapid fire. it's risky, yes, but totally worth it.

 

and yes, when w/in 12", RF weapons MUST fire 2x. this is as it has been for ages.

odds are now 13% that you will roll a gets hot for each shot. they were 33%. (and I rounded up)

 

odds are 66% that you will save, either way - 6% chance of taking a wound from each shot fired - so 11% in rapid fire. it's risky, yes, but totally worth it.

 

and yes, when w/in 12", RF weapons MUST fire 2x. this is as it has been for ages.

 

slight math quibble...rolling a 1 (or any other single #) is rounded up to 17%. the chance stated for an unsaved wound (MEQ) is correct.

odds are now 13% that you will roll a gets hot for each shot. they were 33%. (and I rounded up)

 

odds are 66% that you will save, either way - 6% chance of taking a wound from each shot fired - so 11% in rapid fire. it's risky, yes, but totally worth it.

 

and yes, when w/in 12", RF weapons MUST fire 2x. this is as it has been for ages.

 

slight math quibble...rolling a 1 (or any other single #) is rounded up to 17%. the chance stated for an unsaved wound (MEQ) is correct.

D'Oh!

 

yeah... of course it is.... 1/6 =~17%

Wait - are you saying if you CAN rapid fire you MUST?

 

yes. if your units target is within rapid fire range, and you choose to fire, then you must rapid fire.

 

 

Umm..correct information but wrong first answer.

 

The question he was asking was if you are in range of a target, MUST you shoot at that target.

The answer is of course, no.

 

However, as Eyescrossed wrote- if you do choose to fire, then yes- you must fire 2 shots.

 

 

 

Additionally, its a slight language thing that bugs me and adds to the confusion of a few others.

 

"Rapid fire" should not be used as a verb eg: " Can i rapid fire him? etc etc". Rapid fire is an adjective describing a weapon type.

 

You dont rapid fire, you fire a rapid fire weapon. That kinda confuses people and i think its a 3rd ed. throwback. You dont, and never have had the choice of firing once at 12".

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.