Jump to content

Dirty Tricks with a caluxes assassin.


Polaris

Recommended Posts

The caluxes has a str 5 ap 1 assault 2 that gains +1 attack for every psyker that is 12" of him.

 

Dont Grey knights count a pskyers?

only those with psychic powers

 

 

Could you take a IG psyker squad and get some 10+ attacks?

yes ;)

 

This could be pretty fun!

 

could be, but i find the culexus too specialised to be of use most of the time, even when facinf multiple psykers, you still need to keep the assassin alive to fight them.

 

mel

The caluxes has a str 5 ap 1 assault 2 that gains +1 attack for every psyker that is 12" of him.

 

Dont Grey knights count a pskyers?

 

Could you take a IG psyker squad and get some 10+ attacks?

 

This could be pretty fun!

This is an old-new combo that always sounds great ... until you realize that it requires your entire army to be designed around it and that you have to babysit your Culexus in order to make it work.

 

GKs count as psykers according to the rules in the DH codex. Which is to say: Justicars, BCs, and GK Heroes.

 

And you'll note on p. 47 of the IG codex that only the Sanctioned Psyker actually counts as a psyker for purposes of the rules.

 

So sure, you can find a way to get a sick number of attacks out of the Culexus. But practically-speaking, it's difficult to pull off and so obvious to the opponent that it is easily countered.

 

A one-trick pony that isn't even a very good trick, IMHO.

Neither mystics nor any other Inquisitorial retinue models have the psyker special rule. Mystics are "psykers" -- in quotes only -- just like the vast majority of GKs are "psykers" in quotes only. Don't confuse fluff with rules.
Neither mystics nor any other Inquisitorial retinue models have the psyker special rule. Mystics are "psykers" -- in quotes only -- just like the vast majority of GKs are "psykers" in quotes only. Don't confuse fluff with rules.

umm... where dose it say that the psykers have to have a capital P, or have a special rule, or have "" around their title?

In the character/unit description that's where. Like for the Inquisitor or GK hero etc... And Inquisitors who do not take powers still count as psykers. Mystics etc... do not. Best use for a Culexes is if you know you're playing seer council or some other psyker heavy army. Vs Seer Council a Culexes is a bucket of awesomesauce with extra win on the side. Culexes should never be part of a competitive list IMO. Other than that, stick with the Callidus or Eversor which both are great without having to be going against a specific army.
umm... where dose it say that the psykers have to have a capital P, or have a special rule, or have "" around their title?

 

The same place it says a model must have a Power Weapon to benefit from having a power weapon. You can't add rules wherever you think they apply. All my units don't get "Furious Charge" because somewhere in the fluff it says that an opponent fears their charge. It's made quite clear when a unit does get a special rule, it's not like you can easily mistake them for being psykers when they are not. You'd have to be trying to cheat or willfully misinterpret the rules to argue that mystics are psykers.

 

The IG psyker squad can have 9 psykers in it. The Overseer guy is NOT a psyker, but all the other models in the squad are.

 

In Daemonhunters only, you can have a single psyker in every force org slot except the one used to take the assassin, but no more. Thus, +16 shots if every daemonhunter psyker is in range. With just three IG psyker squads, he becomes assault 28 (9+9+9+1). Pity what he does to even friendly psykers near him, except the Daemonhunters ones who are all fearless and thus don't care.

umm... where dose it say that the psykers have to have a capital P, or have a special rule, or have "" around their title?

 

The same place it says a model must have a Power Weapon to benefit from having a power weapon. You can't add rules wherever you think they apply. All my units don't get "Furious Charge" because somewhere in the fluff it says that an opponent fears their charge. It's made quite clear when a unit does get a special rule, it's not like you can easily mistake them for being psykers when they are not. You'd have to be trying to cheat or willfully misinterpret the rules to argue that mystics are psykers.

I think the fact that i play Daemonhunter Army means that i don't take wining that seriously. If you want to cheat to win pick a more competitive list to begin with. Even if i think it is a legal tactic to employ i would not do it my self for thematic reasons. The only reason i would even bring it up here is the tread was caled "dirty tricks". And excuse me if i some how got it wrong when i think a unit called "mystic" would be a psyker. Silly me for getting a unit called Sanctioned Psyker confused with a psyker. You are right, Warp-seers and Astropaths would never cut it as psykers on the 40k Table top. The first words in their description.... "A tiny number of human psykers are judged psychically strong enough...." The word psyker, or a version of it used no less then 6 times. The ability to allow shooting on all deep strikes with in a radius is one of the most powerful psychic abilities in the game.

Wow way to get your panties in a bunch and call everyone here basically a cheater for actually following the rules. Regardless you are wrong and I'd love to see this attitude at a tournament. Hell, even a friendly game. The only units that count as "pskyers" are the ones with the "pskyer" rule in their character profile. This is how it is. Fluff does not equal rules.

 

And good job bashing on the Daemonhunters army in the Daemonhunters forum. That's like going over to your GF/Wife's mother's house and saying the food sucks lol.

Careful Silver, your ad hominem towards Lorne would only fan the fire of the flame.

 

But your points are still correct. Fluff is not the rules. GW goes quite out their way to state whos a Psyker in-game and who is not. ie even the librarium has the psyker special rule.

 

-Gib-

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.