antique_nova Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 so what do you think is the most competitive wolf build? because at the moment i am convinced that it's the 9 pod list i made, but it is very vulnerable to anti-podding tactics. but then again i can counter it with my pod list easily. anyway enough of my rambling and all singing and dancing talk. What do you guys think? *throws large jugs of ale every where to get the thread started!* thanks antique_nova Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/184012-whats-the-msot-competitive-wolf-build/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnspoon Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 looks a good list but not for me as i would hate carrying 9 drop pods around Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/184012-whats-the-msot-competitive-wolf-build/#findComment-2175230 Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlbitz Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 To be honest Nova, I think that the real beauty of the new Space Wolves codex, is that there is room for alot of good builds. They all seem viable right now, I guess time will tell if one comes out above the others in Tournament play, but for now I think our strength is that when people think of Space Wolves they are not sure what type of Wolf army they are going to face. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/184012-whats-the-msot-competitive-wolf-build/#findComment-2175318 Share on other sites More sharing options...
antique_nova Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 just thought its actually harder to counter anti-podding tactics than i thought ^^. and i tink the other mixed list i made is better. but it seems vanilla. but littlebitz you can say that for the other sm codex. thanks antique_nova Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/184012-whats-the-msot-competitive-wolf-build/#findComment-2175867 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.