Jump to content

Outflanking Thunderwolves!


Darkseer

Recommended Posts

Just been writing another unit guide for the space wolves blog and noticed that you can take a Wolf Guard Battle Leader on a Thunderwolf and give him Saga of the Hunter. :rolleyes:

 

He's still a lot of points, but the potential 24" charge from the side is almost too good to pass up!

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/184058-outflanking-thunderwolves/
Share on other sites

Can't do it. Taking a Thunderwolf Mount changes him to Cavalry and Saga of the Hunter is Infantry only.

 

The codex says 'can't have jump pack or bike'. It says nothing about riding a Thunderwolf.

 

yea, that blog is slightly off on a few things...

 

oh well, i doubt its meant out of power gaming.

 

WLK

 

Can you elaborate what it's 'off on' please?

Can't do it. Taking a Thunderwolf Mount changes him to Cavalry and Saga of the Hunter is Infantry only.

 

The codex says 'can't have jump pack or bike'. It says nothing about riding a Thunderwolf.

 

yea, that blog is slightly off on a few things...

 

oh well, i doubt its meant out of power gaming.

 

WLK

 

Can you elaborate what it's 'off on' please?

 

the saga itself on page 64 says infantry only. infact its the first two words under the bold name.

 

and "what's off", in my opinion, was the write up on the wolf lord and the review of his sagas/wargear. i disagreed on some it it (namely magesty and bear), the preference of bike over TWM, and other stuff in that article. which is why i said it is "off", not "wrong". cause this falls down to matter of opinion, and debating a guy on his personal blog jsut isnt how i like to waste my time. i just took what info i could learn something from, and moved on.

 

WLK

If only everyone had that same philosophy, the interwebs would be a far better place.

 

I gotta agree with Wolf Lord Kieran. While I disagreed with a few of the statements made by Darkseer, it is his personal blog and his opinion. I'm not going to leave a "Dude, your an idiot!" comment or something like that. What he said was his opinion.

 

Now, please! Everyone makes mistakes, and don't turn this into a flame war or something! :huh:

Saga of the Hunter is pure rubbish. In all the greatness that is the Codex, I can't belive that got through.

 

You can't BEL with it, it doesn't pass on to any attched units, and possible the only build for a lone WGBL you'd use it on (On a TWM), you can't.

 

Really. Who's going to outflank a lone WGBL? Or stick him with some outflanking Wolf Scouts that can't BEL?

You could.... ummm.... Use the Hunting on a WGBL and Outflank him and the choose the Scout to BEL to his position...

 

Yeah you're right, it stinks. I think The Hunter is the saga that passed the cut because they need something to fill the page

 

Yeah, the saga does suck.

Just spotted the really bad edit on page 64 where they tagged 'Infantry only' to the front of the Saga of the Hunter entry right before the 'descriptive bit' that normally has little reflection on the rules.

 

Yep, thunderwolf riding WGBL can't outflank. Shame. Bit disgusting if he could I guess.

You could.... ummm.... Use the Hunting on a WGBL and Outflank him and the choose the Scout to BEL to his position...

 

Yeah you're right, it stinks. I think The Hunter is the saga that passed the cut because they need something to fill the page

 

Yeah, the saga does suck.

Just spotted the really bad edit on page 64 where they tagged 'Infantry only' to the front of the Saga of the Hunter entry right before the 'descriptive bit' that normally has little reflection on the rules.

 

Yep, thunderwolf riding WGBL can't outflank. Shame. Bit disgusting if he could I guess.

 

Trust me, i got super exicted when i found this also...then i thought of the carnage of a WGBL outflanking on a TWM and am happy that it was torpedo'd. just imagine the cries of "cheese" if we could!

 

WLK

Simple: They are a seperate unit type with their own page of rules nowhere near the standard infantry rules.

 

yea, i have been doing more indepth studying of the Rule book in the last month than i have in the last few years to set these things right...

 

if only i worked this hard in school! :eek

 

WLK

Simple: They are a seperate unit type with their own page of rules nowhere near the standard infantry rules.

 

yea, i have been doing more indepth studying of the Rule book in the last month than i have in the last few years to set these things right...

 

if only i worked this hard in school! :eek

 

WLK

If only all the things to learn in school could be summed up in about 30 books, with a few errata :).

Simple: They are a seperate unit type with their own page of rules nowhere near the standard infantry rules.

 

yea, i have been doing more indepth studying of the Rule book in the last month than i have in the last few years to set these things right...

 

if only i worked this hard in school! :eek

 

WLK

If only all the things to learn in school could be summed up in about 30 books, with a few errata :).

 

Yea I agree, though we'd have another 30 books of erratas.

It sounds so cool. Having used Shrike and Raven Guard for a while i can confirm the carnage a HQ with unit does when flanking/infiltrating.

 

Shame, shame.

 

I think the sagas could have been slightly better. With warrior born the only real deal. Bear is overpriced and if your intelligent about where you charge your HQ then your fine without it. As in dont charge the powerfisted squad leader...

 

Hunter could have been much more useful, even at the cost of a point spike.

Because 60 Fenrisian Wolves is a mere 480pts, and gives you alot of T4 wounds to get through to hit your footslogging Wolf Gaurd scoring units while they and Grimnar walk up the board?

 

He was asking where his blog was wrong. I was pointing out that is not what Saga of the Wolfborn does.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.