Hjaertrr Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 I guess this isn't fluff perse but more of an army backround/ theme sorta thing. Basically through the culmination of many years of playing i've sort to become more and more competative, building lists to the best that they can be (or atleast trying). However, i've recentrly ran into a problem. What first drew me to Wolves all those years ago and again with the new 'dex is the theme/ fluff and it is what I love most about them. The problem is I keep writing lists and whenever I come to a less tactically viable option I glaze over it in favour of something I deem better, despite possible liking that unit. Now, I beseach my Wolf Brothers to help me overcome this affliction and help motivate me to make a list I like and to hell with competitiveness. Any input you guys could give me on having a heavily norse mythology based army would be greatly appreciated. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/185393-for-fluff-and-the-wolftime/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Growler67 Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 IF you don't care about competitiveness, then what do you like? Vehicles, Jump Packs, Cavalry? If youdon't care about competitiveness, build hat you want. You have answered your own question. What units "crank your handle"? Build them and put them in your Army. Pretty simple actually if you ask me. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/185393-for-fluff-and-the-wolftime/#findComment-2192199 Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitewolfmxc Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 tell me about it wolf brother , i run a completely foot slogging 13th company XD but really if you have fun , while still have a chance to win (even less likely) i say go for it Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/185393-for-fluff-and-the-wolftime/#findComment-2192208 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.