Jump to content

IG Close combat


Prophecy

Recommended Posts

So I just lost a really nasty game against an IG player. He had two Vendettas, a LR, a platoon w/ commisar, a HWT, two chimeras packing dudes with grenade launchers, a pack of stormtroopers and the close-combat unit of death. It seems downright unbeatable, but then I don't know the IG codex so maybe I'm missing something.

 

Unit was the command squad with four veterans (2 GL), 2 bodyguards, Straken and Yarrick. This made them fearless, have counter-attack, furious charge (working off of counterattack), the ability to let him reroll to hit and forced me to reroll successful saves (or maybe wounds, don't remember). It was nasty.

 

With the +1 Str and +1 Init, these guys were space marines with every rule in the book. Stracken got to toss successful wounds off on his guards, yarrick has eternal warrior and a powerfist that works at his own initiative.

 

The Vendetta dropped them off in CC range on the first turn, so I only got one round of shooting in before this squad destroyed a Venny and a GH pack w/ WG (powerfist), MotW, the standard and a plasma gun.

 

So what do you think? This squad single-handedly won the game for him while everything else was wrapped up dealing with armor. Granted, I made some mistakes by worrying more about the Leman Russ and vendettas.... ugh. Thoughts?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/186801-ig-close-combat/
Share on other sites

Yarric- fearless, and wounds on him personally are rerolled. Only on him.

Straken- Furious Charge, relicblade with 2d6 armor pen, and counter-attack.

 

Hrmm... yeah, looks legal really. Note that its Straken with the S6 powerfist a Iniative *more like a chainfist really* and Yarrick goes at I 1.

 

2 Bodygaurds.... dont have PWs or anything.

 

Yeah, did you know they cost 360pts, without a single upgrade? Sounds like they made their points back, but not to much more really.

I agree with previous. One thing though? you may get some more replies if you put your topic title into English... I only clicked on it to find out what on earth it meant. thanks. (Just a tip with acronyms; accepted format is - state the 'full' name once, and then acronym after, you can' assume everyone knows what the acronym stands for or WTASF.
Furious charge only works if they assault that turn. It does not state that it works with counter attack. If he used it when counter attacking that was wrong.

 

this statement alone will start a whole "counter-attack word" argument, and i am surprise it hasn't come up yet.

 

i would personally say that it doesn't apply. so unless there is an FAQ about this some where i am going to say it doesn't. but there will be those that argue that since counter-attack states "as if they too had assaulted that turn." and the fact that furious charge states "in a turn which they assaulted....". so to save about a page or two of going back and forth, make sure that you and who ever you are playing with agree on how the rules work for things. every one is going to have different opinions.

Furious charge only works if they assault that turn. It does not state that it works with counter attack. If he used it when counter attacking that was wrong.

 

this statement alone will start a whole "counter-attack word" argument, and i am surprise it hasn't come up yet.

 

i would personally say that it doesn't apply. so unless there is an FAQ about this some where i am going to say it doesn't. but there will be those that argue that since counter-attack states "as if they too had assaulted that turn." and the fact that furious charge states "in a turn which they assaulted....". so to save about a page or two of going back and forth, make sure that you and who ever you are playing with agree on how the rules work for things. every one is going to have different opinions.

 

Actually the part before the bit about asaulting says:

 

 

If the test is successful all models in the unit get the +1 assault bonus to their attacks, exactly as if they too had assaulted that turn.

 

 

"as if they too had assaulted that turn" follows the part about getting the extra attack. It is part of a sentence not a stand alone rule. What is more important is that the furious charge rule does not mention counter attack.

 

Consider:

 

If the GED test is passed the student gets a diploma, exactly as if he too had finished high school.

 

Basically the same sentence but it does not say the student finished high school it says he gets a diploma as if he finished high school.

Yarrick makes whole squad stubborn and on the turn he assaults, he and the whole squad re-roll any failed to hit rolls. Wounds on him are rerolled, he's immune to instadeath as well. Straken grants the Fearless rule, as well as counter attack and furious charge. His CCW counts as power weapon - not fist - and in his profile Str value is 6 (note that it does not say that his Str is doubled, so his hand is no way a PF). A hell lot of points - Yarrick costs 185, Straken 95, Vendetta with no upgrades 130.
So power fists, thunder hammers, and chain fists don't benefit from furious charge?

 

You only get the strength benefit, and that is after the multiplication, making it strength 7 in the case of a Guardsman.

 

 

Just out of curiosity, what is this based on? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just don't see anything about it one way or the other. Was it in a FAQ?

So power fists, thunder hammers, and chain fists don't benefit from furious charge?

 

You only get the strength benefit, and that is after the multiplication, making it strength 7 in the case of a Guardsman.

 

 

Just out of curiosity, what is this based on? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just don't see anything about it one way or the other. Was it in a FAQ?

 

BRB...oops, sorry Nurglepuss, Big Rule Book...BRB

 

Furious charge give's you +1 to initiative and +1 to strength. So guardsman on the turn he charged would get Strength 4 and initiative 4. If he had a power fist: Strength 7 (power fist doubles strength THEN and +1 for Furious Charge = Strength 7). BUT now he hits at initiative 1 because of the fist.

 

Don't know where in the BRB, but it's in there.

power fists always strike at I1 regardless of the I of the suer or any other factors (its under the power fist entry int he CC section of the rule book). there is a side box early on in the rule book about midfied strength and it staes that if you have +1 stre and double strength on the sme model the doubling up happens first then you add +1. in this case furious charge and power fist, you double your str then add the +1 strength for furious charge but all your attacks are carried out at I1. the only time this will ever change is if menioned in the characters special rules (zagstruk for instance counts as having a power fist that hits at I order when he charges).
Also basic Mathematical principle

 

PEDMAS

 

Parenthesis

Exponents

Division

Multiplication

Addition

Subtraction.

 

Hah! Very nice! Second question: is there any documentation that furious charge doesn't go off of counter-attack? Or is that one of those contested rules?

So power fists, thunder hammers, and chain fists don't benefit from furious charge?

 

You only get the strength benefit, and that is after the multiplication, making it strength 7 in the case of a Guardsman.

 

 

Just out of curiosity, what is this based on? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just don't see anything about it one way or the other. Was it in a FAQ?

 

BRB...oops, sorry Nurglepuss, Big Rule Book...BRB

 

Furious charge give's you +1 to initiative and +1 to strength. So guardsman on the turn he charged would get Strength 4 and initiative 4. If he had a power fist: Strength 7 (power fist doubles strength THEN and +1 for Furious Charge = Strength 7). BUT now he hits at initiative 1 because of the fist.

 

Don't know where in the BRB, but it's in there.

Its on page 7 of the main rule book. Whenever there is a multiplication and addition to a stat, multiply before adding (same as the rules of math say)

Also basic Mathematical principle

 

PEDMAS

 

Parenthesis

Exponents

Division

Multiplication

Addition

Subtraction.

 

 

I think it's PEMDAS, you do the multiplication before the division, the rest is correct. (and now that I'm typing this my wife is clapping her hands and saying I'm smart because she's never heard of PEMDAS before.)

 

Sorry but that acronym has been drilled into my head since 3rd grade.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.