Jump to content

Can you take Razorbacks with 10 men units just for support?


Night Runner

Recommended Posts

I had a one off 2000pt game today at the club with a Tyranid player using the new Tyranid codex. I had been preparing for this game since mid-December, we had even designed the table three weeks beforehand and mapped it out to help us design our tactics.

 

I decided to hold two objectives with a two packs of GH respectively. They were going to footslog mid-board and take the objectives. The GH packs were both led by a WG in TDA and I decided to give both units a Razorback for mobile cover and a bit more fire support. It was something I wanted to try out. The Razorback would not be used as a troop transport until the WG and 4 models of the pack died out.

 

Well to cut to the chase, my opponent would not play with me saying I was power-playing and bending the rules out of the spirit of the game!!! Unbelievable!!! I was rather pissed off (more so because I was accused of power-playing), but decided to give in as not to ruin the evening and took two more termies instead, but I have been brooding since I came back home now as I write this.

 

I have found nothing that disallows this tactic but I'm still not as rule savvy in 5th as I like to be out of laziness. Is taking a dedicated transport with a lower capacity than the unit so out of the spirit of the game? Is there a RAW or RAI that disallows this?

Not even in the slightest. Getting a small tank for support is completely viable and tactically sound. Using the tank as moving cover while not impeding your or it's ability to shoot makes perfect sense. If you're not looking for speed all the time and still want to maintain effectiveness - at the price of protection - then that is you right as the Lord to do so. He was being foolish. If anything he should have been happy you weren't sticking everything in Rhinos as in most cases I would argue that is a better option.

 

Makes good sense, and isn't power gamey at all. Your friend is being foolish imo. - Still your friend but a foolish one.

If I had to face a ravenous horde of viscous aliens that had claws and various toxic spiky bits, i would want what ever mobile armor was around to show up and aid me.

 

That being said i am aware of no rules barring the taking of a razor back for a unit that cannot fit inside.

 

As for it "not being in spirit/power gaming" i would have to say no to either point

 

How many times in history has a general had to make do with what ever resources he had on hand? There are any number of reasons as to why the unit has an undersized APC with them. As for the power gaming aspect, i'm sorry but an extra heavy weapon or two mounted on a vehicle that has relatively paper thin armor doesn't strike me as being particularly power mongering. Don't get me wrong i use them myself, but always in a fluid reserve/backup capacity to the main line

First of all thanks to all who posted.

 

I thought so myself, and on hindsight I should not have given in to his request. It spoiled the game and the night for me. Anyways, thanks for the feedback. I was absent during the 4th edition, I was playing more 10mm fantasy, and I didn't know that Black Templars and WH had these limitations. Maybe that is why he protested.

 

Edit: Don't under estimate the new Tyranids, and try and to read their new dex before engaging them. I didn't and was very surprised in a 'chewed up and spat out' sort of way. Point for point their HQs carry far more punch.

See, calling you a power-gamer for that is ridiculous. Transport Vehicles/Light armour in the modern military would usually be assigned as support to infantry. He just jealous nids don't have transports :tu:

 

Oh and about your comment that nids are tough with their new codex, I agree wholeheatedly as I have the codex myself. Out of curiousity what did he use?

Exactly, nothing wrong with it at all :) I had a moments doubt as to whether it was 'in the spirit of the unit', but as you calirified that the tanks role would be purely cover & support, only getting the guys to a better point in the battle once reduced in numbers, I think thats fine.

 

In fact, I've done it myself. Why would you want to charge into a horde of closecombat killing machines, when you can stand back and shoot.

 

I would ask to replay the guy, saying you would like another shot. Point out the diffrences between codex's and explain exactly why you want to use the support vehicle in that way.

 

Funily enough, some players can get wound up over somethin you have no idea that could be considered 'power gamerish'. I once suggested to my best mate the idea of designing a landraider chassis transport, with no sponsons, for increased capacity (i.e. 10 terminators) and got called as a power-gamer on that! - it wasnt a great idea, a very expensive transport (I reconned about 200pts) [btw this was all just theory, we don't make our own units/rules]. But no, wasnt even able to countenance it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.