Jump to content

crushed the guard today


lothbrok

Recommended Posts

hey everyone just thought id let you all know that i butchered a guard player today in a small 820 pt match for the local campaign. my 5 thunderwolves and lord were able to sluaghter his 50 man guardsmen squad even though they had veteren abilities for feel no pain, perfered enemy, and counter charge.
Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/191143-crushed-the-guard-today/
Share on other sites

so in a tiny game you took a wolf lord on a TWM, plus 5 TWC, and you managed to kill some guardsmen... wow, just wow... who woulda thunk it...

 

imho, the fact that you spent half your points (assuming they had no other upgrades) on one unit and an IC sounds like poor list construction on your part. Was it your intention to take the most powerful unit you could in a game where chances were the IG player wouldnt have that many weapons that could kill them?

 

Not trying to rain on your parade but to me it doesnt sound like that much of a fair fight and I personally wouldn't have enjoyed a game like that, either as the winner or loser.

granted that it wasnt the greatest victory of all time. but i didnt get to go first and i had played this squad before and they had somehow managed to kill all my thunderwolves becuase he fielded straken during both battles however in this most recent he was unable to get him into the combat. this whole occurence had more signifigance to me then it would normally merit becuase before this my thunderwolves have never really accomplished much and i was thinking of ditching them as a unit so it served to rekindle my belief in the awesomeness of russ.
so in a tiny game you took a wolf lord on a TWM, plus 5 TWC, and you managed to kill some guardsmen... wow, just wow... who woulda thunk it...

 

imho, the fact that you spent half your points (assuming they had no other upgrades) on one unit and an IC sounds like poor list construction on your part. Was it your intention to take the most powerful unit you could in a game where chances were the IG player wouldnt have that many weapons that could kill them?

 

Not trying to rain on your parade but to me it doesnt sound like that much of a fair fight and I personally wouldn't have enjoyed a game like that, either as the winner or loser.

 

Breathe, man.....breathe

 

I'm sorry if it makes me a bad person, but if there's something in my army that i'm allowed to use then i'm going to use it no matter what. I'm getting this feeling like when I play old-school fighting games and don't pound out combo after combo. I'm accused of being a button-masher and having no skill. I'm sorry, but if it's something I wasn't meant to do or be allowed to do, then you would think I wouldn't be allowed to do it. If the guard player chose to use a bunch of bodies instead of a tank or two, then that's his choice. His choice to do that doesn't mean that I should immediately change my list to give him a better chance to beat me. Those guardsmen would not have zero chance to kill that squad. The thunderwolves aren't invincible and even a bunch of las fire can take them down. Every army has strengths and weaknesses, and if you choose not to play to your own strengths then so be it. Maybe in the eyes of some people, such a win doesn't make him a great tactician or a good sport. It's war, not checkers.

That is hilarious, because I just had the same exact experience. What was really fun is I managed to get my lonewolf in their too and put a few JOTWW into there prior to that. For someone to say that isn't a feat is crazy. 60 guardsmen with FNP are a bitch. The math hammer on that is also insane. You just have to go at it and go to work. Lots of fun in my opinion. Keep taking them down son of russ!
so in a tiny game you took a wolf lord on a TWM, plus 5 TWC, and you managed to kill some guardsmen... wow, just wow... who woulda thunk it...

 

imho, the fact that you spent half your points (assuming they had no other upgrades) on one unit and an IC sounds like poor list construction on your part. Was it your intention to take the most powerful unit you could in a game where chances were the IG player wouldnt have that many weapons that could kill them?

 

Not trying to rain on your parade but to me it doesnt sound like that much of a fair fight and I personally wouldn't have enjoyed a game like that, either as the winner or loser.

 

Breathe, man.....breathe

 

I'm sorry if it makes me a bad person, but if there's something in my army that i'm allowed to use then i'm going to use it no matter what. I'm getting this feeling like when I play old-school fighting games and don't pound out combo after combo. I'm accused of being a button-masher and having no skill. I'm sorry, but if it's something I wasn't meant to do or be allowed to do, then you would think I wouldn't be allowed to do it. If the guard player chose to use a bunch of bodies instead of a tank or two, then that's his choice. His choice to do that doesn't mean that I should immediately change my list to give him a better chance to beat me. Those guardsmen would not have zero chance to kill that squad. The thunderwolves aren't invincible and even a bunch of las fire can take them down. Every army has strengths and weaknesses, and if you choose not to play to your own strengths then so be it. Maybe in the eyes of some people, such a win doesn't make him a great tactician or a good sport. It's war, not checkers.

 

 

He does make a point, I don't think he was saying your a bad person, but your list was very lopsided. To be honest, as an IG player also, I would NEVER have fielded that unit of 50+ lump backed by Staken. To me this seems like a "mines bigger and badder than yours" more than a game. Mind you this is just perception and I can see how the other post is very true and how you could see it as abrasive.

 

To the heart of the matter, a well prepared IG would have handed you your hide. A Demolisher, Manticore, a few Vendettas, etc...this unit would have been toasted in seconds and you would be left with next to nothing to continue the game with. The forum is to talk about things including feedback on units and success. You was lucky, the next game you may not be so.

Cheers, man. I love my wolves. I run cavalry in every game I can. In my current game, I have two cav units, Canis, a mounted wolf lord and a mounted IP. Nothing wrong with taking the units you like. All those people saying it's tactically stupid? So what? Worst case, you lose! Then your wolves have a grudge to indulge in next time around.

 

Yes, if you were stuck in in round 1, the guard player probably didn't have a very good time, but then again I've been on the losing end of absolute slaughter before and had a great time. *sigh* nothing like seeing one single non-venny dreadnought eat through about 1000 points of my army over the course of a game... We still laugh about it. That dread shrugged off four powerfists, a turn of lascannon and melta fire, an entire unit of rending/thunderhammer cavalry... That's the kind of epic thing that you and your gaming group will remember for ages.

I'm with Stinkenheim on this one. While I too do not wish to detract from your win, there was little strategy or tactics involved (as far as I can tell). You simply took a bigger rock to crush his smaller rock, and revelled in the outcome.

 

Now whether the fight was fair or not is not what I wish to debate. You yourself have admitted that this particular player has beaten you before, so clearly your list isn't unbeatable. But in a tournament/campaign, you really have to ask yourself... Is this list the most effective all-rounder I can make? Would I gladly take this list against any opponent and stand a decent chance at winning, or am I simply over-loading on one particular aspect and hoping to do well? Or heaven forbid simply writing my list to beat a particular player's army?

 

Just some food for thought.

 

 

DV8

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.