Jump to content

Possession or Extra Armor for a Land Raider?


ashrog

Recommended Posts

Title says it. Obviously, possession is usually better for only 5 points more. But does that still apply if the Raider is the primary anti-tank firepower in the army list? Is the -1 BS too much to bear?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a vehicle where everything is twin-linked, the -1 BS isn't that bad. I'd go possession.

 

 

this.

 

 

 

Seconded (thirded?). On a D. Possessed tank I usually shell out ten extra points for a combi-flamer as well....never misses.

 

 

 

Postumus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But does that still apply if the Raider is the primary anti-tank firepower in the army list?

the LR should never ever be the primary anti tank fire power of any chaos army. not without potms. as extra vs possession goes . the thing is that with 2 LR at 1500 pts there is not enough points to buy 2 possesions , so extra armor it is. above 1500 LR rush stops being playable[not that it is very good at 1500 to begin with].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont run with either. Mainly due to three raiders in a 1500 list. Often 28 zerkers and a lord, just to be fluffy. Other times just with pure zerks, and a prince behind one. Either way I will get a charge or two from exiting them. My main anti tank is the zerkers with lascannons acting as anti transport enforcers. They do that job well enough.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.