ashrog Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Title says it. Obviously, possession is usually better for only 5 points more. But does that still apply if the Raider is the primary anti-tank firepower in the army list? Is the -1 BS too much to bear? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmlee Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I'd say extra armor if its all you've got to tank hunt with. That extra one can make all the difference in the world. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289434 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesI Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 On a vehicle where everything is twin-linked, the -1 BS isn't that bad. I'd go possession. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289438 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Crippster Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 On a vehicle where everything is twin-linked, the -1 BS isn't that bad. I'd go possession. this. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289649 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt. Postumus Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 On a vehicle where everything is twin-linked, the -1 BS isn't that bad. I'd go possession. this. Seconded (thirded?). On a D. Possessed tank I usually shell out ten extra points for a combi-flamer as well....never misses. Postumus Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289783 Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 But does that still apply if the Raider is the primary anti-tank firepower in the army list? the LR should never ever be the primary anti tank fire power of any chaos army. not without potms. as extra vs possession goes . the thing is that with 2 LR at 1500 pts there is not enough points to buy 2 possesions , so extra armor it is. above 1500 LR rush stops being playable[not that it is very good at 1500 to begin with]. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289795 Share on other sites More sharing options...
minigun762 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I used to be all about D. Possession for Land Raiders but since we have such crappy ones compared to Codex Marines and the only time we really use them is as assault ramps, I think E. Armor is more then enough. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289845 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashe Darke Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 If I could do something with the extra 10 points from taking Extra Armour instead of DP I would but seen as there's nothing I can really take I fork out the 5pts per Raider. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2289878 Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintevil Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Personaly, I never leave home without a deamonically possessed lr! I may be expensive but its worth it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2291250 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corpse. Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 I dont run with either. Mainly due to three raiders in a 1500 list. Often 28 zerkers and a lord, just to be fluffy. Other times just with pure zerks, and a prince behind one. Either way I will get a charge or two from exiting them. My main anti tank is the zerkers with lascannons acting as anti transport enforcers. They do that job well enough. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2292112 Share on other sites More sharing options...
David the Despoiler Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 Possession all the way. If you're using it as AA (which I did once, took out 3 Hammerheads in 3 turns with just the Land Raider alone), definitely possession. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/192799-possession-or-extra-armor-for-a-land-raider/#findComment-2292142 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.