Jump to content

Blood Angels counts as....


BrotherMoses

Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm starting a list of all of the chapters/warbands(dirty chaos armies) will be possibly using our codex. This should be hilarious.

 

1. Death Guard: FNP on terminators

 

2. Iron Hands: Dreadnought fetish

 

3. Iron Warriors: They want our Baals

 

4. Night Lords: Jump pack envy

 

5. World Eaters: Death Company, Berzerkers, potayto, potauto

 

6. Tyranids: Mephiston properly represents my carnifex >:evil:

 

?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/194490-blood-angels-counts-as/
Share on other sites

Nearly every C:SM player that doesn't use the thunderfire cannon... Unless we're getting that too. Then all of them.

Edit: but in all seriousness:

SW will be using the book for furious charge.

DA will be using it because... well that seems to be the consensus for the DA players in my LGS

Puff.......any self respecting SW player will not have a thing for Mass jump pack troops as Troops while also have Fast vehicles that can outflank or even deep strike , we dont like those much XD Also Without Counter Charge...........what SW are we talking about ?

 

XD but on topic the most suspected user of this new book is.............WAIT FOR IT.............WAIT FOR IT.............not enough build up..........wait for it.............dada.......Emperors Children......pre heresy or current XD

-Fast attack company[8th co](full company of RAS and bikers) of any chapter
That's the one I've been toying with the past few day's. I suck at painting black, and fail at keeping a consist red across multiple models. Which isn't working well with my choice of chapter (Flesh Tearers) and DC models I plan to use. It's either a 8th company FA, or DIY for me.
From a fluff point of view, I would be very tempted to use the BA rules for the Raven Guard.

 

Win.

 

At the same time, I have a problem with the "Furious" part the Blood Angels typifies that doesn't seem to be what the Raven Guard are about. At least to me.

From a fluff point of view, I would be very tempted to use the BA rules for the Raven Guard.

 

Win.

 

At the same time, I have a problem with the "Furious" part the Blood Angels typifies that doesn't seem to be what the Raven Guard are about. At least to me.

 

Furious = ruthless.... works for me... but nope, I am sticking with the Blood Angels, but if I was not, and if they made moulded shoulder pads for them, it would be RG.

  • 2 months later...

Yeah going to have to say "We have our own 'dex that works pretty good...we don't need yours." And counterattack,as allready stated,is sooo much more useful.

 

I still think using Blood Angels Death Company to simulate Necron's would be hilarious. Dreads to represent their heavy Destroyers. Mephiston to represent the Nightbringer. Assault troops to represent Pariahs. Scouts to represent the Flayed ones. And a Captain would make a good representation of a Necron Lord in terms of relative power.

When you say Blood Angels count as, I really cannot get one thing from my mind...And that thing being in some thread somewhere in this forum mentioned:

 

LEAPING TEMPLARS OF DOOM!!!!

 

"Templarsquad as CD?"

"Yeah, they are really, really full of holy hatred..."

"Okay,and that group?"

"Assault squad!"

"They do not have jump packs!"

"Yeah, their righteous zeal enables them to jump really far!"

 

I laughed so hard when i read this...

When you say Blood Angels count as, I really cannot get one thing from my mind...And that thing being in some thread somewhere in this forum mentioned:

 

LEAPING TEMPLARS OF DOOM!!!!

 

"Templarsquad as CD?"

"Yeah, they are really, really full of holy hatred..."

"Okay,and that group?"

"Assault squad!"

"They do not have jump packs!"

"Yeah, their righteous zeal enables them to jump really far!"

 

I laughed so hard when i read this...

I would agree that any count's as should show some serious work in modeling,and should have some basis of logic.

I would agree that any count's as should show some serious work in modeling,and should have some basis of logic.

 

This. If it makes sense and the models are easily distinguishable, then by all means. I mean, you'd have to be pretty humorless dude to have much of a problem playing an army like this, eh? Da Nightbringa :RTBBB:

I would agree that any count's as should show some serious work in modeling,and should have some basis of logic.

 

yeah only the rules for counts as use as supported by GW dont do anything like that. you point at a model that has generaly the same size and the same base and presto counts as done.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.