Gentlemanloser Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 May I ask what role you have planned for the PAGK? Unless you want them to hold back at a home objective as a sort of mini prugation squad, it's not worth buying 2 Psycannons on them. It costs an extra PAGK to remove what makes the GK a GK (his NFW and True Grit). Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/197836-brother-captain-vs-grandmaster/page/2/#findComment-2358077 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother_Kaelgrim Posted April 11, 2010 Author Share Posted April 11, 2010 I just put the psycannons as an option. I'll take whatever you guys think works best, I'm a total newbie :lol: Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/197836-brother-captain-vs-grandmaster/page/2/#findComment-2358105 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justicar Valius Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Well when dealing with PAGK you want 2 of the same special weapon in each squad. This means there are 2 semi competitive loadouts. 8 PAGK, 2 incinerators, 245 (You can add frag grenades to the Justicar, some like meltabombs too) 5/6 PAGK, 2 psycannons, 200/225 First squad is raider mounted when I use it (basically all the time) and does well but is dies quickly to shooting. Second squad sits on the home objective and makes use of the shrouding. It can blast off a fair amount of dakka and is still no slouch in combat. Honestly Grey Knight terminators are much better but they don't score and I like my PAGK. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/197836-brother-captain-vs-grandmaster/page/2/#findComment-2358594 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gentlemanloser Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Or keep the PAGK base, and don't buy any upgrades for them. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/197836-brother-captain-vs-grandmaster/page/2/#findComment-2359046 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.