Mark of the Wulfen

[robertlee]

Can you guys please help me settle a debate? Is Mark of the Wulfen used along with your normal attacks when assaulting or instead of your normal attacks when assaulting?

[Maximus-92]

Instead of, it replaces your attack value but you still get a bonus for charging but not for two weapons, meaning on a rol of a 6 you get 8 attacks on the charge(grey hunters)

[Fred Johnson the 3rd jr]

Damn, I thought the rules were incredibly clear on this, how the heck can anyone have a debate? Lost your rulebooks?

 

Look at page 62 of the codex. It says wulfen REPLACES the usual attacks.

[The_Betrayed_Spacewolf]

selective reading or going from memory when a book is not handy.

[sniperhavens]

Kill yourself Cook, I told you dude also Fred Johnson no need to be soo harsh man your disrespecting a veteran and a good friend of mine.

[The_Betrayed_Spacewolf]

ok nerds to your corners i want a good clean slap fight no long fingernails.

[Silvtalon]

Instead of, it replaces your attack value but you still get a bonus for charging but not for two weapons, meaning on a rol of a 6 you get 8 attacks on the charge(grey hunters)

 

Grey hunters have 1 attack in there profile...

So that would be 1d6 +1 for mark of the wolfin when not charging since they do not count close combat weapons.

But on the charge they would get 1d6 +1 +1(on the charge)

 

Swiftclaws and Blood claws have berserk charge thus.. They get 1d6+1 +2(on the charge)

 

As a side note, I had my mark of the wolfin space wolf in my last game de-arm that special frontal armor 13 dread naught from the blood angles codex the one with the pair of lighting claws in the first round of combat before it could even swing since my wolves were in cover. It was pretty funny seeing the blood angels player get upset that his blender dreadnought wouldn't be able to do anything to the squad after that. By the time he assaulted my greywolves in combat with this speciality dreadnaught it lost both arms and was immobilized. A shame I didn't have a power fist in the squad at that time.

[Fred Johnson the 3rd jr]

Kill yourself Cook, I told you dude also Fred Johnson no need to be soo harsh man your disrespecting a veteran and a good friend of mine.

 

So you tell someone to kill themselves, then you have the audacity to complain about respect?

 

My point is the rule is ridiculously clear, so I don't see how there can be a debate, unless the debating parties did not have access to the rule. That is not disrespectful, that is logical. Disrespectful would be telling someone to kill themselves, or for another example pointing out grammar and spelling mistakes for no reason. I will leave it to the reader to decide for themselves who is out of line in this thread.

[The_Betrayed_Spacewolf]

they are friends so obviously they can tell each other to go die.

[sniperhavens]

In the Army its ok to tell someone to kill themselves, its just something we say. I also thought the rule was ridiculously clear but if someone has a question you should just answer without the sidebar comments about how obvious it is. That kind of stuff puts people off to sites like this one. Just sayin.

[Fred Johnson the 3rd jr]

So you agree it is obvious, yet you are whining about me pointing out it is obvious? And somehow claim it is "disrespectful" to say it is obvious if the rule is available to read?

 

Surely there is a better use of your time.

[Valerian]

Instead of, it replaces your attack value but you still get a bonus for charging but not for two weapons, meaning on a rol of a 6 you get 8 attacks on the charge(grey hunters)

 

Grey hunters have 1 attack in there profile...

So that would be 1d6 +1 for mark of the wolfin on charge since they do not count close combat weapons.

 

Swiftclaws and Blood claws have berserk charge thus.. They get 1d6+2 for charging (but not while counter charging)

 

MotW gives you d6+1 Attacks, so for most models this would be D6+2 on the charge and D6+3 for models with Berserk Charge (ie. Claws).

 

You've been shorting yourself 1 Attack.

 

V

[Silvtalon]

Instead of, it replaces your attack value but you still get a bonus for charging but not for two weapons, meaning on a rol of a 6 you get 8 attacks on the charge(grey hunters)

 

Grey hunters have 1 attack in there profile...

So that would be 1d6 +1 for mark of the wolfin on charge since they do not count close combat weapons.

 

Swiftclaws and Blood claws have berserk charge thus.. They get 1d6+2 for charging (but not while counter charging)

 

MotW gives you d6+1 Attacks, so for most models this would be D6+2 on the charge and D6+3 for models with Berserk Charge (ie. Claws).

 

You've been shorting yourself 1 Attack.

 

V

 

Lol, I noticed my mistake in what I typed On the charge yes you get d6 +1 +1 (Charge) I was in the mind set of when you don't charge. I'll go back and fix that right away.

[robertlee]

To Fred, sorry my codex isnt handy Im in Afghanistan. Havens, you should kill yourself for being so ugly. You look like your at least 40. Fred dont get so bent out of shape he doesnt mean actually kill yourself it is our way of speaking to one another.

[hendrik]

everyone, let's keep polite shall we?i'd rather come between this before max or lord rags has to solve this