ArmouredWing Posted September 27, 2010 Share Posted September 27, 2010 Here's a little something that cropped up during a recent game. I had a couple of vehicles placed snuggly between the edge of the board and a solid (no moving through) building and as they presented a nice compacted target my opponent decided to assault them with some SM bikers. Now the outcome was that my vehicles were immobilised but not destroyed, however this left my opponent in a situation where he was still in BTB with my vehicles and wanting to move said bikers through the gap left between one of the exorcists and the building (approx 1 1/2" - 2"). At this point 'debate' ensued with my good friend and opponent stating that he could do it and me saying he couldn't because his move would bring him within 1" of the vehicle. As it was I very generously (please note this Gone Fishing!!! heh heh heh) allowed my opponent to do this move that was from the front of the vehicle, around the side and off round the corner of the building where they were swiftly dispatched by IL Karamazov but the question remained in my head; when a vehicle is immobilised by a squad what movement would that squad be allowed to make to move but not to within 1" of the immobilised vehicle? I think this might be a bit of a grey area but I'd be interested in how other handle it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted September 27, 2010 Share Posted September 27, 2010 No, he cant move within 1" of an enemy model unless hes assaulting it. That part is pretty straight forward. hed have to kill the tank completely in order to pass. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2522546 Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatcrusade08 Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Yeah grey mage has it, although alot of people forget that if you assault a vehicle and it doesnt move you can assault it again in your opponents turn. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523066 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother-Chaplain Gaius Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 what do you mean greatcrusade? if I assault a vehicle in my turn, and in my oppenents very next turn he doesnt move that vehicle in his movement phase I can assault it again in his assault phase? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523821 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 what do you mean greatcrusade? if I assault a vehicle in my turn, and in my oppenents very next turn he doesnt move that vehicle in his movement phase I can assault it again in his assault phase? Yes, the BRB is quite explicit on that one. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523846 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother-Chaplain Gaius Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I've never heard of that, ever. :D guess I'll be doing a lot more assaulting then, I still dont believe you can use your enemys assault phase basically as an extra free assault turn. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523900 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I've never heard of that, ever. :D guess I'll be doing a lot more assaulting then, I still dont believe you can use your enemys assault phase basically as an extra free assault turn. Free? If the unit in BTB with the vehicle its not locked, can still be shot at, and isnt likely in assault with an enemy unit... Oh, and your enemy has to have not moved, at all, not even a pivot. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523907 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Wilhelm Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I've never heard of that, ever. :P guess I'll be doing a lot more assaulting then, I still dont believe you can use your enemys assault phase basically as an extra free assault turn. You don't have to believe it. It is true :D . :P Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523915 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother-Chaplain Gaius Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Oh I believe it Im just shocked heh, can I have a reference or page # so when I use this in an actual game I can back it up? thx in advance Brothers. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523919 Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurglez Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 page 63, vehicles and assaults under the sub heading successive turns. "If a vehicle that has been assaulted, and has survived, does not move in its successive movement phase, enemy models will still be in base contact with it during its shooting and assault phase.... units that still have models in base contact with a vehicle in its assault phase may attack it as normal, just as in a normal ongoing combat." Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2523971 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeattleDV8 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Oh, and your enemy has to have not moved, at all, not even a pivot. No they remain in BTB if the vehicle only pivots. BRB pg. 63 " ...move these models out of the way as you shift the vehicle and then place them back into base contact......" Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2524537 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Oh, and your enemy has to have not moved, at all, not even a pivot. No they remain in BTB if the vehicle only pivots. BRB pg. 63 " ...move these models out of the way as you shift the vehicle and then place them back into base contact......" Ooh, missed that- thank you. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2524617 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmouredWing Posted October 1, 2010 Author Share Posted October 1, 2010 No, he cant move within 1" of an enemy model unless hes assaulting it. That part is pretty straight forward. hed have to kill the tank completely in order to pass. Nicely put sir, however it raises a further question. Could a unit move away from said vehicle in the subsequent turn or are they effectively locked in CC until either the vehicle is destroyed or moves away from the assaulting unit? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2525899 Share on other sites More sharing options...
thade Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 You can't be locked in CC with a vehicle (unless it's a walker). You can freely step away...and then charge in again if you wish. Or just stand there and keep swinging. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2525965 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Knight Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 Here's a little something that cropped up during a recent game. I had a couple of vehicles placed snuggly between the edge of the board and a solid (no moving through) building and as they presented a nice compacted target my opponent decided to assault them with some SM bikers. Now the outcome was that my vehicles were immobilised but not destroyed, however this left my opponent in a situation where he was still in BTB with my vehicles and wanting to move said bikers through the gap left between one of the exorcists and the building (approx 1 1/2" - 2"). At this point 'debate' ensued with my good friend and opponent stating that he could do it and me saying he couldn't because his move would bring him within 1" of the vehicle. As it was I very generously (please note this Gone Fishing!!! heh heh heh) allowed my opponent to do this move that was from the front of the vehicle, around the side and off round the corner of the building where they were swiftly dispatched by IL Karamazov but the question remained in my head; when a vehicle is immobilised by a squad what movement would that squad be allowed to make to move but not to within 1" of the immobilised vehicle? I think this might be a bit of a grey area but I'd be interested in how other handle it. AW as I was there and we discussed this at the time, no you cant be within 1 inch of the vehicle but it was a 2 inch gap meaning he could go through it (base width and 1 inch spare). No, he cant move within 1" of an enemy model unless hes assaulting it. That part is pretty straight forward. hed have to kill the tank completely in order to pass. Nicely put sir, however it raises a further question. Could a unit move away from said vehicle in the subsequent turn or are they effectively locked in CC until either the vehicle is destroyed or moves away from the assaulting unit? You cannot be locked in combat with a (non walker) vehicle so yes of course you can move away and re-asault if you wish. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2526274 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 Yes, if there was a 2" gap you were fine- GWs 25mm rounds are just a smidge under an inch after all. In either case, the vehicle assault rules are as weve all noted. Hopefully this is all cleared up then? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2526286 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother-Chaplain Gaius Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Yes, if there was a 2" gap you were fine- GWs 25mm rounds are just a smidge under an inch after all. In either case, the vehicle assault rules are as weve all noted. Hopefully this is all cleared up then? Looks like it, it is after all real clear in the rules *smacks self* Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/212030-assaulting-vehicles-subsequent-movement/#findComment-2526556 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.