Jump to content

New FAQ's out


Lord Ragnarok

Recommended Posts

They addressed many issues I am impressed.

 

Surprised they had to spell out so many basic rule issues (2xFrost and 2xWolf claw)

 

Arjac ruling is nice for those playing with Jaws.

 

WG deployment ruling helps with tournament players.

 

The TWC question makes me chuckle as we went through that in detail in the devil's advocate thread. It doesn't connect the dots and tell us a modification to a characteristic replaces the original profile though.

 

They still haven't touched OBEL for IC though...

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617405
Share on other sites

I agree. Many of these were no brainers, but a good FAQ usually includes those too.

 

Arjac ruling is nice for those playing with Jaws.
Nasty! I wonder if they took this into account.

outch, the one, the only, true Mephiston killer, I can see it now :P the cheese calling would never end :D

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617429
Share on other sites

I'm still a little confused about how Thunderwolf mounts interact with Thunder Hammers or Power Fists (on a Lord for example). Do you double the base strength and then add +1 for a total of 9, or add 1 and then double for 10?

(4+1)x2=10.

 

Why? Because its specificly a modification of the base characteristic, not just a wargear modifier.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617542
Share on other sites

I'm still a little confused about how Thunderwolf mounts interact with Thunder Hammers or Power Fists (on a Lord for example). Do you double the base strength and then add +1 for a total of 9, or add 1 and then double for 10?

(4+1)x2=10.

 

Why? Because its specificly a modification of the base characteristic, not just a wargear modifier.

 

That's what I thought, but I had seen it the other way as well.

 

It just makes the most sense to have it the same as the Thunderwolf Calvary, since you'd think a Lord wouldn't be any weaker than a standard squad.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617560
Share on other sites

Q. Can a vehicle with Power of the Machine Spirit fire a

weapon on the turn the vehicle uses Smoke Launchers?

(p44)

 

A. No.

 

This one had been debated quite a bit over on the Official Rules subforum. Nice to see them actually answer one that had gone round and round so much.

 

It looks like most big issues from Codex Space Wolves have been addressed. Is there anything out there that we've argued about that still hasn't been resolved?

 

So we are still saying 10 because I have read one blog today where it says not!

 

Most definitely yes. The FAQ explains exactly how the increase to Toughness works ( a straight 5, rather than a 5(4)), since it is a modification to the base characteristic. The very next FAQ response states that it is also a base characteristic modification for Strength (thus it should be treated the same way). If you start out with a base characterstic of 5 for Strength, then giving them a Power Fist/Thunderhammer is going to make it a 10. Shouldn't be any confusion on this now.

 

V

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617610
Share on other sites

I'm still a little confused about how Thunderwolf mounts interact with Thunder Hammers or Power Fists (on a Lord for example). Do you double the base strength and then add +1 for a total of 9, or add 1 and then double for 10?

(4+1)x2=10.

 

Why? Because its specificly a modification of the base characteristic, not just a wargear modifier.

 

I know this has the potential to open a can of worms but be careful with that line of thinking.

 

There is no such thing as a wargear modifier v. base characteristic modifier in the "MULTIPLE MODIFIERS" rule. They were simply not written with this in mind and the language is lacking.

 

You have to RAI the TWM S+1 to the base characteristic is an exception that occurs outside.

 

I think it is a moot point as most tournaments are granting S10 but just keep it in mind when you do rule interpretation.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617612
Share on other sites

They still haven't touched OBEL for IC though...

 

I think they spell it out very clearly that an IC can outflank together with Scouts (Specifically mentioned this time), if they have Saga of the Hunter or another rule that gives outflank.

 

 

 

 

I don't want to start a huge distraction discussion but OBEL is not the same as OUTFLANK. The interaction of these rules and an IC is the main issue that needs to be FAQed.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617619
Share on other sites

So we are still saying 10 because I have read one blog today where it says not!

Could you point us there because someone is failing English and Maths and they need to be corrected? Thanks.

 

With the +1 S to the base profile the Lord/TWC is getting to hit with S10 in combat as has been neatly explained earlier.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617624
Share on other sites

So we are still saying 10 because I have read one blog today where it says not!

Could you point us there because someone is failing English and Maths and they need to be corrected? Thanks.

 

With the +1 S to the base profile the Lord/TWC is getting to hit with S10 in combat as has been neatly explained earlier.

 

 

not sure, it was from one of the from the warp blogs

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/219464-new-faqs-out/#findComment-2617704
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.