Jump to content

Beasts of War Grey Knight Week


ChaosPhoenix

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I don't know, if you follow Beasts of War. I usually do. I've enjoyed Johns painting videos and the army weeks. It's giving me something to watch while I'm painting.

Is anyone else following it? To be honest, I don't like it this time. It gives a wrong impression of the army and they get a lot of rules wrong. How do you like it?

Another thing is, they talk about Grey Knights like a close combat only army. I still think, Grey Knights are more flexible. Moving, Shooting, Moving more. Do you see Grey Knights as close combat only?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/226745-beasts-of-war-grey-knight-week/
Share on other sites

Some of the stuff they put up there cracks me up, like when the guy that supposedly plays historical painted a Warlord Games plastic german in grey (field grey is a greyish green and vallejo makes it in the model color line, which he was using) or when the 40k guy assembled the BA furioso librarian with a magna grapple (he couldn't figure out why it did fit right on the libby sarcophagus) and kept calling the frag cannon a "fang cannon"

I've been watching their videos all this week, and I have to say that for a bunch of guys that got the codex early and have supposedly been analyzing it for the "cheese" options, they've been getting a lot of basics wrong. I don't mean just in terms of what's effective/tactics, but in terms of basic rules. One that particularly stood out to me was one of the guys talking about how Hammerhand and Daemon Hammers = Str 9 when the book explicitly says the Hammerhand bonus is factored in before other mods! The other one that's really been bugging me is how they repeatedly say Psilencers wound everything on 4+. Or how they think you can stick Psybolt Ammunition on Hurricane Bolters and still move around full speed blasting with them when the Str 5 makes them stop being Defensive Weapons.

 

Now, I usually enjoy the BoW videos, and I watch them more for the enthusiasm for the hobby they display than for meaningful rules breakdown and analysis. I don't think it's ever bad to get more opinions and viewpoints on things, but I must say that their Grey Knight coverage has been way off base so far and incredibly misleading.

I do enjoy the video for entertainment value (it makes great company for when I'm doing some modelling :rolleyes:) but.....yeah. I'm a little saddened about the numerous mistakes they've made and that I actually know more of the rules off the top of my head than them with their notes, preparation, codex and Ipads in front of them.

(and the newer bald guy seems slightly confrontational, I'm not sure if its intentional/just for fun, but its slightly irritating to be honest)

 

But all that said I always like it when someone plays the devil's advocate and gives suggestions against the grain, since it gives me a chance to view it from a side untainted by bias and reason it out myself.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.