dreadwing Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 hi, just wanted a quick opinion, on the SG only 2 has the nipples but they do look stupid personally. i seen a pic of a chest without the nipples and it looked alot better. i wonder should i do the same on mine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAGABOND Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 It's all down to personal preference tbh dude, all my SG have their nipples so it's completely upto yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awfulawful Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Just keep in mind that if you want to use the models in tournaments, then they need to be WYSIWYG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Nathan Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 lol! but yea so as you want. as long as it aint changing the units wargear your gud to go. personally i like thenipples as it freks some people out... makes themm waste stupid amounts of firepower to get them off th table as soon as possible ;) though im still waiting to see a slannesh version where they weplace the nipples with grenade rings and add chains to them... :tu: yea i just made a bunch of people cringe, score... :yes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deschenus Maximus Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Just keep in mind that if you want to use the models in tournaments, then they need to be WYSIWYG. Winnar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreadwing Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 well i think i'll do it because the nips just look stupid. and the wysiwyg....well they still SG, hows that gonna change???? remove nips -1 to stength does it ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesI Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 There is no reason you can't remove the nipples and still call them SG if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deschenus Maximus Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 well i think i'll do it because the nips just look stupid. and the wysiwyg....well they still SG, hows that gonna change???? remove nips -1 to stength does it ??? The WYSIWYG bit was intended to be humourous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jma037 Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Did you guys not read the new FAQ? The nipples count as a digiweapon in close combat and inflicts 2 S3 AP - hits to one model in base contact. In my last game I killed two Nurgle Terminators with some very lucky rolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mykra Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Did you guys not read the new FAQ? The nipples count as a digiweapon in close combat and inflicts 2 S3 AP - hits to one model in base contact. In my last game I killed two Nurgle Terminators with some very lucky rolls. Ah, Warhammer 40K: The Anime, coming soon to battle-tables near you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judaz Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Thats why I've started to put nipples on my Dreadnoughts. It actually counts as the second dccw on my furioso with frag cannon. I called Matt Ward and he said that it's ok as long as I call them Blood Nipples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReachOnyx2552 Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Awesome! Just awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Drop Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 I've put nipples on the blood strike missiles on my stormraven, they are now 'blood strike nipples'!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.