Jump to content

Vlka Fenryka!


Azza007

Recommended Posts

Or is it Space Wolves? I am in the end stages of reading Battle of the Fang (good read I might add) and have come to realise that this new view of the Rout that we have had in Prospero Burns and now BotF makes me love the Wolves even more.

 

When I was young and first gained knowledge of the Wolves it was reading the excellent Ragnar series by Mr King. I saw the Space Wolves as fun-loving space vikings and instantly thought how cool are these guys! They always came across to me as Space Marines that are cool and fun to be around, the comical relief of 40k.

 

This newer, darker approach has grabbed me as to be more 'realistic' and in the setting of grimdark. The fact that they come across as more barbaric and ruthless than ever before seems to give them an even greater appeal to me.

 

What I was wondering is what other people prefer, the Space Wolves of William King or the new grimdark Rout of Dan Abnett and Chris Wraight?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/
Share on other sites

When I was young and first gained knowledge of the Wolves it was reading the excellent Ragnar series by Mr King. I saw the Space Wolves as fun-loving space vikings and instantly thought how cool are these guys! They always came across to me as Space Marines that are cool and fun to be around, the comical relief of 40k.

 

We must've read two different Omnibus.. because I didn't get that feeling at all.

 

Admittedly, I prefer the newer series, and feel that the two mentalities should be reversed. If anything, the Wolves would be more grim and primal now than back then, given the incursion of Chaos is now a constant, whereas before the Heresy, it was non-existent (atleast in combative armies), causing the Wolves to be more on guard and ruthless.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2775527
Share on other sites

the rout all the way. king's wolves while cool just didnt have the same sort of depth or flavor they seemed almost like ultramarines in wolf pelts while the rout are some hardcore alien killers.

 

on slightly different note abnetts wolves are better in how he approached the viking theme. he didnt just try to put vikings in power armor but took an approach that added a good mix of awesome historic viking and crazy psycho werewolf.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2775702
Share on other sites

the rout all the way. king's wolves while cool just didnt have the same sort of depth or flavor they seemed almost like ultramarines in wolf pelts while the rout are some hardcore alien killers.

 

on slightly different note abnetts wolves are better in how he approached the viking theme. he didnt just try to put vikings in power armor but took an approach that added a good mix of awesome historic viking and crazy psycho werewolf.

 

i have got to ask, have you even read anything of king's Wolves or mmcneils' ultramarines? normally i just ignore stuff i disagree with, but something that blantantly incorrect had to be addressed.

 

i can understand why people favor the grimdark wolves over the modern wolves, but atleast know the subject matter in some regard before giving a opinion.

 

and i personally like the Wolves from the HH short story "Wolf at the Door". savage and brutal while retaining some of the attitude the modern Wolves have.

 

WLK

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2775715
Share on other sites

Or is it Space Wolves? I am in the end stages of reading Battle of the Fang (good read I might add) and have come to realise that this new view of the Rout that we have had in Prospero Burns and now BotF makes me love the Wolves even more.

 

When I was young and first gained knowledge of the Wolves it was reading the excellent Ragnar series by Mr King. I saw the Space Wolves as fun-loving space vikings and instantly thought how cool are these guys! They always came across to me as Space Marines that are cool and fun to be around, the comical relief of 40k.

 

This newer, darker approach has grabbed me as to be more 'realistic' and in the setting of grimdark. The fact that they come across as more barbaric and ruthless than ever before seems to give them an even greater appeal to me.

 

What I was wondering is what other people prefer, the Space Wolves of William King or the new grimdark Rout of Dan Abnett and Chris Wraight?

 

The Rout.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2775750
Share on other sites

I like them both.

 

I hope lots of people feel like this. Bill King's Space Wolf books are loved by many people, and rightly so. Plenty of readers got into the hobby through reading them, and they present a very coherent, very well structured view of the 40K universe. It's no insult to those books to suggest that they might appeal to a newer, or perhaps younger, audience to 40K than some other novels in the range.

 

Recent books on the Wolves have taken a slightly different approach. The tone in SM novels released in the last few years, such as the Night Lords and the Salamanders series, is much darker - more 'adult', I guess. That's the natural result of a shared setting where different authors have different visions of 40K, and of a background lore that's slowly evolving.

 

I suspect the original Space Wolf quadrilogy (a word?) will remain very popular, and many readers will prefer those books to the portrayal of the SWs in Prospero Burns or Battle of the Fang. There'll be others who feel exactly the opposite. It strikes me as a Very Good Thing that a Chapter as interesting as the Space Wolves has such different portrayals available.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776007
Share on other sites

I fell in love with the 40K universe for two main reasons. The evocative art of the late 80s and early 90s, and Bill King's stories (most specifically his two Siege of Terra bits). When Black Library kicked off over 10 years ago, and decided on a first few novels, I was most excited for Space Wolf.

 

Space Wolf, and the next three novels, are tonally a bit different from modern BL fiction, but the current authors working with Space Marines are certainly standing on King's shoulders. King's work has a bit more "boy's adventure" to it than the current Marine fiction. But it also has good characterization. King remembers that Space Marines are both human and inhuman, and to focusing stories on Ragnar needed to highlight some of their humanity.

 

I enjoy the new characterizations as well. Battle of the Fang is resting on my table, waiting for me to finish Age of Darkness (two stories to go - I just began "Rebirth"and I have ADB's to finish it off...I didn't go in order). I actually recently completed Prospero Burns, and the Wolves are my favorite chapter. I liked almost everything about it. It has a different feel, and certainly recast the Wolves a bit. But only a bit. Considering how patchwork the 40K universe is, different interpretations are the norm. I also enjoyed Mike Lee's Wolf at the Door in the previous anthology. I really enjoy the short fiction about the siege of the Fang by Apostate forces in WD 244 or 245. I think Gav Thorpe wrote that.

 

Even then, like any good enthusiast, I have my own view of the Wolves, informed by all of the authors that have written them, as well as what has seeped into my own perspective from completely unrelated sources. I do feel that BL fiction has evolved over the years. But I still really enjoy those King novels, and I still love the character of Ragnar.

 

Looking forward to Battle of the Fang quite a bit. It has gotten extensive praise. Starting that this week.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776038
Share on other sites

I was merely putting down what I saw the Wolves as in the Ragnar books, everyones opinions are different, and thats how they came across to me then and even now. I may not have put it down in the best way but that was the closest I could put them down. I had read the BotF straight after re-reading Space Wolf, and to me that just seemed the difference, happy Space Vikings vs grim and brutal Viking warriors. I agree with Chris when he puts it as the boy-ish adventure vs the dark adult ways.

 

I still love the Ragnar series, just this new direction of the Rout appeals more to me and seems more right.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776110
Share on other sites

Granted i have not read much of the lore, how ever they have never struck me as the comical relief of 40K. To be honest, i dont even get the whole "Drunken warrior" theme most people associate them with. In fact, they literary strike me as the vikings from 13th warrior taken to the future. I think that this perception (drunken warriors) is mostly due to the fact that they are the only non religious fanatic like chapter out there.
Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776135
Share on other sites

What are you trying to say...drinking ale isn't a religious experience? Great now my faith is shaken to the core...

 

It's an act like the duel in 13th Warrior, properly titled Eaters of the Dead a modern retelling of Beowulf by Micheal Crichton....loosing my copy is one of the reasons that I don't loan out my personal library any more.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776428
Share on other sites

the drunk attitude actually comes more from forums like these and a lot of peoples perception then the actuall written texts. i believe in one of the books it's mentioned we usually only feast after a prolonged campaign etc. can't come up with the source atm though..

the same goes for the wulfen. a lot of people like werewolves and so instantly think of the wulfens as were wolves while infact, a wulfen has quite a dark feeling to it and truely is a curse. read wolf's honour and you'll get what i mean ;)

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776544
Share on other sites

If anyone's read any of the Mercy Thompson books by Patricia Briggs, I see Wulfen as the werewolves in that series when they're pissed, but still have enough control to stay human. Lots of gutteral noises, and a feral gleam played over amber-hot, dilated yellow eyes giving you an almost vacant death stare. Like a tiger in the brush, just before the strike.
Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2776557
Share on other sites

the drunk attitude actually comes more from forums like these and a lot of peoples perception then the actuall written texts. i believe in one of the books it's mentioned we usually only feast after a prolonged campaign etc. can't come up with the source atm though..

the same goes for the wulfen. a lot of people like werewolves and so instantly think of the wulfens as were wolves while infact, a wulfen has quite a dark feeling to it and truely is a curse. read wolf's honour and you'll get what i mean :)

 

Yup, or listen to "Thunder from Fenris", or even "Battle of the Fang". Turning Wulfen, fully falling to the beast within, is not honorable. One of the things I love is the theme of the "inner beast" keeping it to the front in battle as much as possible for strength, but keeping it controlled and not succumbing to it fully. Some Wolves are better then holding it back vs others. Some situations will make it harder then others to keep it controlled.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2777172
Share on other sites

If anyone's read any of the Mercy Thompson books by Patricia Briggs, I see Wulfen as the werewolves in that series when they're pissed, but still have enough control to stay human. Lots of gutteral noises, and a feral gleam played over amber-hot, dilated yellow eyes giving you an almost vacant death stare. Like a tiger in the brush, just before the strike.

 

I have to agree with this completely, but then again I am a big fan of the Mercy Thompson series too. :)

 

 

I think the only Space Wolves story I have not liked has been their role in "Battle for the Abyss". Too much of the drunken brawler

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2777478
Share on other sites

If anyone's read any of the Mercy Thompson books by Patricia Briggs, I see Wulfen as the werewolves in that series when they're pissed, but still have enough control to stay human. Lots of gutteral noises, and a feral gleam played over amber-hot, dilated yellow eyes giving you an almost vacant death stare. Like a tiger in the brush, just before the strike.

 

I have to agree with this completely, but then again I am a big fan of the Mercy Thompson series too. :rolleyes:

 

 

I think the only Space Wolves story I have not liked has been their role in "Battle for the Abyss". Too much of the drunken brawler

Pfff that drunken brawler is one of the reasons why I started playing Space wolves.

Well actually space wolves is my first army of real 40K and people just had to say they are like the space vikings. And I was sold

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/230867-vlka-fenryka/#findComment-2777578
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.