eyeslikethunder Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 Yeah this was my first thought put in the BRB FAQ if it affects more than one codex It is a very rare, rare, rare day when I put my rune priest into close combat, much less with anything daemonic. However, this seems to be a pretty bad case of bad writing in that if anything it should have been part of the BRB FAQ not the codex specific illusion of the GK FAQ. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2792897 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktiger Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 who has ever claimed that deamon princes arnt deamons? or the avatar, lesser deamons etc. the suprise is that things that have been clased that wernt compleately obvious like mandrakes and oblits. it makes sense but really then they need to mark in the codexes what is a deamon and what isnt... i think one of the GW authors summed it up best in an interview a while back when asked what is and isnt a demon cause of the 'type:demon' thing; "...it says 'demon' in the name. duh..." it pains me to see how often writers have to confirm whether a unit really is a demon or not, after assuming the gamers arent stupid enough to have to ask this when the unit says 'demon' in its name. that's like asking a 'satanic worshiping cultist teenager' "hey, do you believe in satan or no? cause, the term used to describe your group may imply it, buuuut, im not so sure your not really just an athiest." B) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2792898 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimtooth Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 After checking out the BA faq in regard to Baal Predators popping smoke during their scoutmove I am even more convinced now that the GK faq that defines daemons is exclusive to the GK special rule of Preferred Enemy (Daemons) or any other army that has Preferred Enemy (Daemons) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2792921 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillen Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 That makes no sence what so ever? What are you saying. That you were looking at an army spefic tank with a specail ability of only that army, and now you believe a daemon can not be a daemon with our rune weapons because????? Um what? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2794017 Share on other sites More sharing options...
maverik_girl Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 That makes no sence what so ever? What are you saying. That you were looking at an army spefic tank with a specail ability of only that army, and now you believe a daemon can not be a daemon with our rune weapons because????? Um what? no more than wanting to field a storm raven for your space wolf army :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2794020 Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 That you were looking at an army spefic tank with a specail ability of only that army, having a Demon Prince without the demon rule[which the demon codex DP clearly has] is also codex specific . It is the same you got with the pre FAQ BT and DA gear it worked different even if it had same names . Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2794064 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 That you were looking at an army spefic tank with a specail ability of only that army, having a Demon Prince without the demon rule[which the demon codex DP clearly has] is also codex specific . It is the same you got with the pre FAQ BT and DA gear it worked different even if it had same names . Im sorry that GW felt, like most people, that having the Title of DAEMON Prince was obvious enough. If they had more rules lawyers in their cadre people wouldnt be so misled Im sure. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2794120 Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Im sorry that GW felt, like most people, that having the Title of DAEMON Prince was obvious enough. If they had more rules lawyers in their cadre people wouldnt be so misled Im sure. you mean like the one shot cyclons and the ss that work only in hth and give +4 inv ? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2794239 Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeslikethunder Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 there are a few rulings in the codex FAQ's that affect other armies such as The Eldar FAQ has rulings about Skimmers in , the Space Wolf FAQ tells us how Counter-Attack and Furious Charge interact and two CCWs on bikes was in the DE FAQ. So it is not new for FAQ rulings to have cross codex affects So to me this this ruling will affect our rune weapons Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2794245 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Mage Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 Im sorry that GW felt, like most people, that having the Title of DAEMON Prince was obvious enough. If they had more rules lawyers in their cadre people wouldnt be so misled Im sure. you mean like the one shot cyclons and the ss that work only in hth and give +4 inv ? Oh look.... those dont exist any more, and for many of us those havent existed for a long time. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2795034 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valerian Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 there are a few rulings in the codex FAQ's that affect other armies such as The Eldar FAQ has rulings about Skimmers in , the Space Wolf FAQ tells us how Counter-Attack and Furious Charge interact and two CCWs on bikes was in the DE FAQ. So it is not new for FAQ rulings to have cross codex affects So to me this this ruling will affect our rune weapons Exactly, the FAQs often have cross-codex implications. Aren't the Answers for questions on Drop Pods found the the FAQ for Codex Space Marines? Do those answers not apply to our Drop Pods (or Blood Angels, etc.)? Of course they do. The location of the answer is irrelevant when the answer provides the details needed to resolve a question from elsewhere. V Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2795093 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktiger Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 you mean like the one shot cyclons and the ss that work only in hth and give +4 inv ? which btw have all been updated to 5th edition codex marines' 2 shot cyclones, 3++ SS to HTH AND shooting. ;) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/231974-new-grey-knight-faq-mainly-daemon-part/page/2/#findComment-2796366 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.