Bulweih Posted November 24, 2011 Share Posted November 24, 2011 Greetings Brothers, currently there's some discussion that seems unsolvable going on in my apoc gaming group. So I turn to the most able bunch of players I know on the net. One of us is playing Epidemius. He has that The Tally of pestilence special rule, which was also topic in the current errata. The basic questions I have are as follows: Do Plaguemarines count towards this rule, although they're from another codex entirely? So do they in the end when the Tally is full gain Bolters that denie armor saves completely? It just don't sound right to me, please tell me I'm not wrong :P . Clarifications with hard evidence would be most appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesI Posted November 24, 2011 Share Posted November 24, 2011 In the event that Epidemius is on the table with Plague Marines, the Plague Marines count to the Tally. I recently played a team game against Nurgle Demons and Plague MArines. That was tough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frosty the Pyro Posted November 24, 2011 Share Posted November 24, 2011 The requirements to count for epidimus's rule is "deamon of nurgle, or model with mark of nurgle, both friends and enemies." Plauge marines have the mark of nurgle, so they count, as would any of the many options in the chaos space marine codex that can take mark of nurgle, assuming of course you (or they as the case may be) did take mark of nurgle. You could argue that the noxious touch bit will only work on deamons though but thats being kinda dickish. that said tally of pestilence is a rule quite distinctly desighned for normal games, not apocolypse games, It may be wise to house rule (and as its apoc there should be a lot of that going around) that the count requirement is increased. 1x for every 2000 points on the side seams reasonable to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacefrisian Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 It mentions all nurgle things, so why go sit on the designers chair and completly change its ruling.. BTW Forsty you might wanna re-read my sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatcrusade08 Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 BTW Forsty you might wanna re-read my sig. :lol: i remember when you first posted that in your sig, you got the spelling wrong yourself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulweih Posted November 25, 2011 Author Share Posted November 25, 2011 A Big Thanks to you Brothers! Ale for the Sons of Russ and all who ain't but still want a sip or two ;) . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacefrisian Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 BTW Forsty you might wanna re-read my sig. :) i remember when you first posted that in your sig, you got the spelling wrong yourself... At least iam trying to learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interrogator-Chaplain Ezra Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 You could argue that the noxious touch bit will only work on deamons though but thats being kinda dickish. It would also be wrong, according to the wording of the rule and the FAQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.