Bran Redmaw

[skoll]

I know quite a lott of people who disagree with you on that topic skoll, and that is sort of the defenition of a disagreement. Also, you try to slip one past me by saying that the question is awsered. The saga of the hunter/behind enemy lines is not my question. My question is what sort of experiences have people had with Bran Redmaw army lists, outflanking with fenrisian wolves in particular.

 

that has BEEN answered and is exactly what I'm referring to, one of our forum members posted an entire blog entry reviewing the character and his experiences with it. Clearly those people that'd disagree with me are the same that said jaws needed to roll to hit.

[Niiai]

Do you have a link? I can not find the blog entry I have searched.

 

And those people who disagreed one jaws had theyr right to say that it needed to roll to hit as the core rulebook FAQ that all psycic shooting attacks needed to roll to hit and Jaws labels itself as a psycic shooting attack. Mind you that god reviced in the new years FAQ as a consequens of the core book FAQ that came befiore it.

[skoll]

except u'd retroactively be rolling to hit :/

 

also a little looking would have netted you this

 

http://wolvesforthewolfgod.blogspot.com/20...-and-stats.html

[Russ Brother 92]

thanks for the link skoll

[Skarvald the Troll-faced]

I was the one who played a game using Bran.

It is such a great game and it allows for a very different play style. The list allows you to control the center of the table AND the sides/corners as well. Your opponent literally has nowhere to run and nowhere to hide. Supporting your packs becomes very easy. The outflanking Bran with Fenrisian Wolves is hilarious. The unit is threatening enough to throw a wrench in your opponent's plans without necessarily being a huge threat. My opponent (a Dark Eldar player) couldn't decide between focusing or ignoring the unit and it cost him two disabled Ravagers.