Jump to content

How do you kill Abaddon the Despoiler?


thor1234

Recommended Posts

Abby is screwed against the Vindicare, as long as your dice don't hate you and roll 1-3 on the to-wound roll :thanks:

 

You can actually reroll your ones with grand strategy which increases your chances by 8% I believe (I actually kinda like this because I hate it when my assassin fails to wound especially of his 2+)

The Point is, the Tzeentch Mark improves the InvSave provided by TermiArmour (Wording as per Rule in the CSM Dex).......No InvSave there (Shieldbreaker Ammo) no improvement to 4+...............

Thanks GW............. for another clearly formulated Battle Situation...

 

in my own Opinion ist clearly RAW and RAI as well.......and works as described....

 

Some RuleGod will correct me if I'm wrong........

It depends. If the Mark of Chaos Ascendant special rule says he has the marks of all the gods, and to refer to their entries for details etc, and the Mark of Tzeentch is classified as Wargear, then it, too, is removed by the Shield Breaker- since he is granted Wargear by a special rule.

 

If the Mark of Tzeentch is not Wargear, then he keeps it, and the Shield Breaker round reduces his invulnerable save from 4 to 5.

from page 25 of the chaos codex.

 

"Models with the Mark of Tzeentch gain +1 to their invulnerable save...if given to a model that does not normally have an invulnerable save, this mark confers an invulnerable save of 5+".

 

And the mark of chaos ascendant (which gives him all the marks of chaos, so the mark of tzeentch also) is a special rule, not wargear.

from page 25 of the chaos codex.

 

"Models with the Mark of Tzeentch gain +1 to their invulnerable save...if given to a model that does not normally have an invulnerable save, this mark confers an invulnerable save of 5+".

 

And the mark of chaos ascendant (which gives him all the marks of chaos, so the mark of tzeentch also) is a special rule, not wargear.

 

So he has a 4++ normally, due to his Terminator Armour (improved by the Mark of Tzeentch), but would still have 5++ if the shieldbreaker removes that, due to the Mark of Tzeentch.

 

PS - Hinti..........what's........with........all........the.......gaps....?

And the mark of chaos ascendant (which gives him all the marks of chaos, so the mark of tzeentch also) is a special rule, not wargear.

Yes, we have this part figured out :woot: I was asking whether or not the Marks are Wargear.

 

If Chaos Ascendant is a special rule that says "... has all Marks," and Marks are Wargear, then the Mark of Tzeentch can be removed via a Shield Breaker round.

 

If Marks are not Wargear, then Abby will be 4++ to 5++ after a Shield Breaker hit.

And the mark of chaos ascendant (which gives him all the marks of chaos, so the mark of tzeentch also) is a special rule, not wargear.

Yes, we have this part figured out :cuss I was asking whether or not the Marks are Wargear.

 

If Chaos Ascendant is a special rule that says "... has all Marks," and Marks are Wargear, then the Mark of Tzeentch can be removed via a Shield Breaker round.

 

If Marks are not Wargear, then Abby will be 4++ to 5++ after a Shield Breaker hit.

 

Marks are not wargear. They are Special Rules (C:CSM, Pg 25)

And the mark of chaos ascendant (which gives him all the marks of chaos, so the mark of tzeentch also) is a special rule, not wargear.

Yes, we have this part figured out :cuss I was asking whether or not the Marks are Wargear.

 

If Chaos Ascendant is a special rule that says "... has all Marks," and Marks are Wargear, then the Mark of Tzeentch can be removed via a Shield Breaker round.

 

If Marks are not Wargear, then Abby will be 4++ to 5++ after a Shield Breaker hit.

 

Marks are not wargear. They are Special Rules (C:CSM, Pg 25)

Yep. Units that come with Marks included in their base profile, like cult troops, have their marks listed under Special Rules in their army list entries.

That sounds understandable. Missed the part, that the Marks are NOT Wargear. In that Case, 5+ InvSave (only from the Mark) for Abbi, still enough I think. But 5+Inv is easyer to beat as 4+Inv........he will die even "faster".

 

@Morollan:

Sorry for the Gaps, if they are confusing you. They mean nothing, just a kind of Placeholder.

 

Hinti

Absolutely, it doesn’t even take that much shooting, if you rend with your Psycannons or bring some plasma it will go even faster.

 

But come on! Really!? The biggets, badest, badasses in the galaxy, constructed for the sole purpose of spitting in the Eye of Terror and grinding the filth of Chaos under there boot, are going to back away and shoot?!

 

Do as Barenone suggested and just rip his arms of, beat him to death with his own bloody limbs and don’t forget to step on his face as you walk over his corps to slaughter any lingering resistance .

 

Remember that good girls go to heaven. Grey Knights go to hell and regroup!

There's always the Brotherhood Champion method, if you can charge him into abaddon's unit and get him in btb you'll have a good chance of removing him from play using the sacrifice, given how expensive Abaddon is it's a worthwhile sacrifice.
from page 25 of the chaos codex.

 

"Models with the Mark of Tzeentch gain +1 to their invulnerable save...if given to a model that does not normally have an invulnerable save, this mark confers an invulnerable save of 5+"

 

My issue here is that I could argue he does normally have an Invulnerable Save.

 

For me this means he gets that +1 improvement, as per the rule, but then when the Shieldbreaker removes that the whole thing is nullified - he has already benefited from the Mark so should not recieve a second benefit from the same Mark.

 

But that's just me.

The thing is the mark isn't removed from Abby, hence all it's effects are still active including the ability to confer a 5+ since he no longer has one on his terminator armour.

 

Think of it as the Crux Terminatus or whatever equivilent Chaos termies would have is removed by the shield breaker but Tzeentchs favour is still protecting him.

The thing is the mark isn't removed from Abby, hence all it's effects are still active including the ability to confer a 5+ since he no longer has one on his terminator armour.

 

Think of it as the Crux Terminatus or whatever equivilent Chaos termies would have is removed by the shield breaker but Tzeentchs favour is still protecting him.

 

Ah but the wording, according to the above post, is "if given to a model that does not normally have.." and Abby does - it has just been removed by another in-game mechanic - thus why would he get that second benefit from it?

Simply cause he no longer has and invuln, the effect of the Mark is constant so it isn't removed when hit by the shieldbreaker.

reverting his invuln to 5+ as the marks effect is still active.

But i'm guessing i'm not going to convince you and can see us spouting the same argument in a circle. :tu:

Simply cause he no longer has and invuln, the effect of the Mark is constant so it isn't removed when hit by the shieldbreaker.

reverting his invuln to 5+ as the marks effect is still active.

But i'm guessing i'm not going to convince you and can see us spouting the same argument in a circle. :tu:

 

You probably won't convince me, no, it's just how I view this particular thing but I can understand how you'd come to your conclusion.

Simply cause he no longer has and invuln, the effect of the Mark is constant so it isn't removed when hit by the shieldbreaker.

reverting his invuln to 5+ as the marks effect is still active.

But i'm guessing i'm not going to convince you and can see us spouting the same argument in a circle. :tu:

 

You probably won't convince me, no, it's just how I view this particular thing but I can understand how you'd come to your conclusion.

 

How about "Does a model that has been hit by a shieldbreaker round normally have an invulnerable save from wargear?" In which case, Abby does not normally have an invulnerable save in these circumstances.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.