Jump to content

The Mawloc's deep strike attack


VonMerrick

Recommended Posts

I have a question about the Mawloc's AP2 attack when it deepstrikes. In a game today I had a Long Fang squad on the second and third floor of a ruin. Per the SW forum, the Mawloc's attack does not reach the second or third floor as the model cannot be placed there.

 

Is this right that only models on the ground can be hit or is this like a template attack as the Nid player argued today?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/248281-the-mawlocs-deep-strike-attack/
Share on other sites

This should really be in OR...

 

But, I just checked the Mawloc's C:T entry. Now it doesn't say anything about it being ground floor only, but it must be placed where it chooses to surfaces. Therefore, it would appear that the Mawloc can use Terror from the Deep on a unit high up in the building as long as you can place it there afterwards, no hitting models on the top floor and then deploying on the ground floor.

 

Also remember it will take a dangerous terrain test if it deep strikes into cover.

BRB pg. 95, Units Deep Striking into ruined buildings are placed on the ground floor.

+1 to this. All deepstrikes must occur on the ground floor.

The Mawloc can at least assault the 2nd and 3rd floor of the building in successive turns.

 

Your friend is also "no longer" correct about the attack being a template. According to the most recent FAQ:

Errata: "Page 51 – Mawloc, Terror from the Deep"

"This rule refers to using a large blast template. The word “template” should be changed to “marker” throughout the paragraph."

 

It also cleared up this argument.... thankfully,

Q: Can a Mawloc choose to Deep Strike onto a point occupied by an enemy model on purpose in order to use the Terror from the Deep special rule? (p51)

A: Yes.

 

If a Mawloc does catch you on the bottom floor, you can still take a cover save:

Q: Can I take cover saves from a Mawloc’s Terror from the Deep attack? (p51)

A: Yes.

 

 

-Myst

Coversaves shouldnt be a question at all, it says it has AP2 and no mention of ignoring cover.

Shouldn't being the operative word; some people don't have a complete grasp of the big gun rules and think that cover can always be negated by a Large Blast Template, depending on where the hole in the center is in relation to the affected models and their cover.

Coversaves shouldnt be a question at all, it says it has AP2 and no mention of ignoring cover.

Shouldn't being the operative word; some people don't have a complete grasp of the big gun rules and think that cover can always be negated by a Large Blast Template, depending on where the hole in the center is in relation to the affected models and their cover.

That and the fact that the Mawloc is coming up from UNDER the cover... how do you 'duck and cover' from a giant alien that is burrowing up from underneath you trying to swallow you whole? Why would hiding behind a rock prevent being swalloed whole when standing in the open doesn't prevent that? From a FLUFF perspective it makes absolutely no sense to take cover saves from this... Anyway, it's not a shooting attack, and it feels like a MC close combat attack (hence the AP2) so that's where people were coming up with the "can't take cover" bit. Now we don't have to worry about it because it's been spelled out.

 

EDIT: Thought of one more old argument... What WOULD you get a cover save from it? It's not a shooting attack... closest equivilent is the battlewagon (which doesn't allow coversaves) so...

 

Like I said before, now we don't have to worry about it because it's been spelled out.

 

-Myst

Coversaves shouldnt be a question at all, it says it has AP2 and no mention of ignoring cover.

Shouldn't being the operative word; some people don't have a complete grasp of the big gun rules and think that cover can always be negated by a Large Blast Template, depending on where the hole in the center is in relation to the affected models and their cover.

That and the fact that the Mawloc is coming up from UNDER the cover... how do you 'duck and cover' from a giant alien that is burrowing up from underneath you trying to swallow you whole? Why would hiding behind a rock prevent being swalloed whole when standing in the open doesn't prevent that? From a FLUFF perspective it makes absolutely no sense to take cover saves from this... Anyway, it's not a shooting attack, and it feels like a MC close combat attack (hence the AP2) so that's where people were coming up with the "can't take cover" bit. Now we don't have to worry about it because it's been spelled out.

 

EDIT: Thought of one more old argument... What WOULD you get a cover save from it? It's not a shooting attack... closest equivilent is the battlewagon (which doesn't allow coversaves) so...

 

Like I said before, now we don't have to worry about it because it's been spelled out.

 

-Myst

 

 

Its 40k, you even get a coversave when 1 model is shooting at another model in terrain only 1" from each other.

 

Dont try to apply realworld logic to a game.

Its 40k, you even get a coversave when 1 model is shooting at another model in terrain only 1" from each other.

 

We call this the Leslie Nielsen rule; two guys ducked behind dustbins a few feet apart shooting at each other.

 

 

Damn dustbins all the time... :P

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.