Grey Knights NFW in 6th AP value rules

[Inquisitor Fox]

Unless of course the definitions and such are changed in the new rulebook. Just sayin... :lol:

[Gentlemanloser]

True, true. ;

 

'Cause a wound' is ambiguous. Do you 'cause a wound' when you score a hit that wounds? Or do you only ciae one when a save is failed for a wounding hit?

 

;)

[Oiad]

Not at all, I'm simply pointing out that our NFW will also follow the rules for FW in the BRB, like they do now. :cuss

 

So it's not really Codex > BRB, as our codex refers to the BRB for FW rules.

Ahh, I've led you to believe my original post was some blanket statement of sorts and it's taken us off the original point somewhat. Make no mistake, it is clear enough from here when a codex is relating back to the BRB rather than overruling it. But Codex>BRB would likely apply to the issue of specific weapon types such as axes, which is what was on discussion. My post was simply backing Jeske's view on how Halberds will likely work: They won't be some bizarre amalgamation with the new axe rules but more likely will remain as they are, unless they're changed in an FAQ.

[Gentlemanloser]

Ah, yeah. :(

 

They won't work how TJ posted, that's for sure. ;)