Jump to content

Nemesis Daemon Hammers are AP3?


mjc

Recommended Posts

Is it true that our Daemon Hammers are AP3 now? Based on FAQ & rulebook it looks like it.

 

FAQ:Page 54 – Nemesis Force Weapons, Force Weapons.

Change the first sentence to read “Unless otherwise stated, all

Nemesis weapons are Unusual Force Weapons, as detailed in

the Warhammer 40,000 rulebook.”

 

Rulebook says:

"If a force weapon has its own unique close combat rules, treat it as an AP3"

 

PLEASE tell me it's not so....

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/255004-nemesis-daemon-hammers-are-ap3/
Share on other sites

I agree that it has the function of a Thunderhammer but it falls under "unusual force weapon" because of the daemonbane rule. Thus I can see the folks at my group saying it is AP 3 but functions as a Thunderhammer. GW needs to be clear with these FAQs!

 

If folk in your gaming group try to say daemon hammers are AP3 the solution isn't clearer rules from GW, it's finding a new gaming group ;)

NDHs are unusual force weapons, therefore the follow the rules in the codex. The codex rule is that they are thunder hammers with daemon bane. Ergo they are AP2, Unweidly, Concussive, Daemon Bane.

If this is how it is worded in the codex, that seems pretty definitive to me. AP2 (which is logically the right anwer anyway)

No, because it states that if the model has any special rule, the weapon counts as an 'Usual Force Weapon'. The GK FAQ even goes as far as saying all the Nemesis Force Weapons fall in this category. Then, you have an AP3 force weapon, unless the weapon's entry states otherwise (such as the Daemon Hammer stating it follows the rules of a Thunderhammer).

 

So the Halberd is S as User, AP3, Melee, Two-handed, Force which grants +2I and Daemonbane.

The Daemon hammer is Sx2, AP2, Melee, Concussive, Unwieldy, Specialist Weapon, Force with Daemonbane.

So even though the NDH has the Daemonbane special rule, it doesn't count as an unusual force weapon? How come?

 

It is an unusual Force Weapon, but it's entry SPECIFICALLY STATES that it uses the rules for Thunder Hammers. It simply has the Daemonbane and Nemesis Force Weapon rules too.

 

Vlk, are you by any chance a non-Grey Knight player? Or perhaps a player who dislikes Grey Knights? Just asking.

So even though the NDH has the Daemonbane special rule, it doesn't count as an unusual force weapon? How come?

 

It is an unusual Force Weapon, but it's entry SPECIFICALLY STATES that it uses the rules for Thunder Hammers. It simply has the Daemonbane and Nemesis Force Weapon rules too.

 

Vlk, are you by any chance a non-Grey Knight player? Or perhaps a player who dislikes Grey Knights? Just asking.

 

How did you know :) I don't play GKs and I don't even like them but this has nothing to do with it. I just want to know what I'm going against and some parts of the new rule seem quite confusing.

So even though the NDH has the Daemonbane special rule, it doesn't count as an unusual force weapon? How come?

 

It is an unusual Force Weapon, but it's entry SPECIFICALLY STATES that it uses the rules for Thunder Hammers. It simply has the Daemonbane and Nemesis Force Weapon rules too.

 

Vlk, are you by any chance a non-Grey Knight player? Or perhaps a player who dislikes Grey Knights? Just asking.

 

How did you know :) I don't play GKs and I don't even like them but this has nothing to do with it. I just want to know what I'm going against and some parts of the new rule seem quite confusing.

 

I fail to see the confusion, the rules arevery clear unless you are trying to confuse them.

 

Daemon Hammers are unusual weapons as descibed in the rules but follow Thunder Hammer rules as per the description. At no point does any rule contradict

So even though the NDH has the Daemonbane special rule, it doesn't count as an unusual force weapon? How come?

 

It is an unusual Force Weapon, but it's entry SPECIFICALLY STATES that it uses the rules for Thunder Hammers. It simply has the Daemonbane and Nemesis Force Weapon rules too.

 

Vlk, are you by any chance a non-Grey Knight player? Or perhaps a player who dislikes Grey Knights? Just asking.

 

How did you know :) I don't play GKs and I don't even like them but this has nothing to do with it. I just want to know what I'm going against and some parts of the new rule seem quite confusing.

 

Lol, fair enough mate. You needn't worry too much about the rules confusion; we'll teach you all you need to know on the battlefield ;)

 

See you out there and good hunting mate.

Yeah, I've read claims of AP 3 NFH here and there. I wouldn't mind, really. In exchange, I'd claim that it then strikes at Ini 4 (since it doesn't follow TH rules) B)

 

Phil

lol ;) I4, S10 (after some Hammerhand), why, we're Blood Angels now.

 

I concur; the codex says it's a thunder hammer with some additions, so that's what it is.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.