Jump to content

Is Draigo useful in 6th Edtion?


Cmdr Shepard

Recommended Posts

Greetings Battle Brothers,

What's your opinion on Draigo in 6th Edition?

 

During 5th Edition Draigo was regarded as a beast in CC but the new rules on power/force weapons nerfed his "Sword of Titan" to a mere AP3 weapon. (Stil devasting versu psyker vehicles,like Furioso Librarian, though :) )

This can harm his performances in CC, especially against opponents with AP2 weapons and 2+ armour save.

 

I believe Draigo is still a wonderful model for protecting expensive units like paladins with his capability to withstant a lot of damage, especially when backed up with an apotecary, but is he still useful outside the paladins' "Draigowing"?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/256052-is-draigo-useful-in-6th-edtion/
Share on other sites

Draigo will usually be attached to a squad of Paladins, who are all characters. So if you run into the guy with the 2+ armour save, just challenge/answer the challenge with a Paladin with a Nemesis Daemon hammer. Or use Draigo to keep the other character busy while the Paladins kill the rest of the squad, then use a Glorious Intervention to switch the hammer wielder in the challenge to kill off the one with the 2+, providing he's not dead already.

I agree with bot of you about Draigo and Paladins but I was wondering about his role outside the Paladins lists.

I 5th Edition I used Draigo more often than I used paladins and he was nearly unstoppable, now I'm curious to see if he has a role without his "paladins guard" :)

He's still pretty unstoppable, just not as killy as before ;)

 

I often found that he ended up missing or failing to wound with most of his attacks (I call it IC syndrome), I'll happily challenge anything with him, knowing he should be able to tank them while my paladins kill everything else :D

He's still pretty unstoppable, just not as killy as before :D

 

I often found that he ended up missing or failing to wound with most of his attacks (I call it IC syndrome), I'll happily challenge anything with him, knowing he should be able to tank them while my paladins kill everything else :D

Will you challange Arjac-like characters with him?

hmmm, either challenge Arjac with draigo, challenge him with a paladin or let him run wild through a squad of paladins...

 

Yes, I'd challenge Arjac with Draigo :D

It seems the general "consensus" on Draigo is: "I play him with Paladins", thus answering to my original question with a "It's not very useful outside Paladins list" :D

Am I right?

no. cause he is the only EW IC for GK. so you can put him with some foot slog units, or drop him in a LR with something else and use him THAT way. he can soak up challenges for a unit of purifiers so that they can massacre another squad.

 

you can use him with other units, just be creative in how you do it. the reason why most people use him in a pally list is he unlocks pallys as troops.

no. cause he is the only EW IC for GK. so you can put him with some foot slog units, or drop him in a LR with something else and use him THAT way. he can soak up challenges for a unit of purifiers so that they can massacre another squad.

 

you can use him with other units, just be creative in how you do it. the reason why most people use him in a pally list is he unlocks pallys as troops.

Perhaps I didn't make my point clear... I was trying to say "He will be useful for the same role he has in paladins lists but not longer as CC beast"

Perhaps I didn't make my point clear... I was trying to say "He will be useful for the same role he has in paladins lists but not longer as CC beast"

How is he not a CC beast, though? So he's only AP3. He's also very high Str, very high number of attacks, and a Force Weapon to boot...if he gets one wound through, there aren't many characters that can stand up to that. There are ICs that pen his 2+ (with axes, fists, etc) but he's still got EW, 3++, and a mess of wounds himself. And he's like T5, right?

 

The guy is still a beast, make no mistake.

In certain situations (namely in close combat against 2+ save models) he's not as strong as before. Thade nailed it quite nicely though. Draigo's effectiveness isn't just because he had a nice sword that ignored saves - his profile and statline are just plain good, very good.

 

I think he'll be good at challenging psykers - 4 WS7,Str 10 attacks at initiative 5 will splatter most psykers in the game.

Perhaps I didn't make my point clear... I was trying to say "He will be useful for the same role he has in paladins lists but not longer as CC beast"

How is he not a CC beast, though? So he's only AP3. He's also very high Str, very high number of attacks, and a Force Weapon to boot...if he gets one wound through, there aren't many characters that can stand up to that. There are ICs that pen his 2+ (with axes, fists, etc) but he's still got EW, 3++, and a mess of wounds himself. And he's like T5, right?

 

The guy is still a beast, make no mistake.

AP3 means versus 2+ characters with AP2 weapons he risks to suffer more wounds than his opponent. I quoted Arjac for a reason. Arjac will still make his 2+ armour saves while Draigo will have to count on his storm shield. I'm not saying he will lose the combat, I just asked if someone had some 6th edition combat experience with Draigo to share and remove some of the doubts I have :lol:

If my calculations are correct a charging Draigo should inflict 0.37 unsaved wounds on Arjac (0.46 with hammer hand), then Arjac attacks inflicting 0.42 unsaved wounds.

It's clear the duel will be likely a draw but Arjac costs much less than Draigo.

 

In 5th edition Draigo would have a good chance to kill Arjac before he had the chance to retaliate.

If we consider a character like Arjac but without storm shield Draigo would have killed him with easy while now we are lucky if we inflict a single wound to the enemy character.

 

This is what I was talking about. Of course Draigo is still powerful but I was curious to read about other players opinions on Draigo's current "CC prowess".

 

In certain situations (namely in close combat against 2+ save models) he's not as strong as before. Thade nailed it quite nicely though. Draigo's effectiveness isn't just because he had a nice sword that ignored saves - his profile and statline are just plain good, very good.

 

I think he'll be good at challenging psykers - 4 WS7,Str 10 attacks at initiative 5 will splatter most psykers in the game.

Indeed. I already mentioned it... Psyker vehicles, like Furioso Dreads for example, will be destroyed with ease.

If my calculations are correct a charging Draigo should inflict 0.37 unsaved wounds on Arjac (0.46 with hammer hand), then Arjac attacks inflicting 0.42 unsaved wounds.

It's clear the duel will be likely a draw but Arjac costs much less than Draigo.

Arjac doesn't come with Grand Strategy, S10 vs Psykers, Psychic Communion, Psychic Mastery Lv 1, or the host of other niceties that Draigo comes with. You need to keep in mind that there's a reason the Wolves have access to a character like Arjac and we don't, and it's not just points-cost...it's big-picture/codex-wide. Also, Arjac does not unlock Paladins as Troops...

 

Assuming your calcs are accurate, I'd happily assert that 0.37 wounds, 0.42 wounds, and 0.46 wounds are all functionally the same when you account for significant figures here. :( because either they're all zero or Draigo comes out very slightly ahead (0.5 vs 0.4).

Doesn't Draigo have mastery level 2?

 

I only use Draigo to unlock Paladins, and to help paladins survive. If I could take an army of paladins without him, then I would.

 

Accepting a challenge from Arjac with him depends on all the other factors in the combat, and while Arjac is 87 points cheaper, those 87 point's buy you a fair bit with Draigo, as Thade mentioned :(

If my calculations are correct a charging Draigo should inflict 0.37 unsaved wounds on Arjac (0.46 with hammer hand), then Arjac attacks inflicting 0.42 unsaved wounds.

It's clear the duel will be likely a draw but Arjac costs much less than Draigo.

Arjac doesn't come with Grand Strategy, S10 vs Psykers, Psychic Communion, Psychic Mastery Lv 1, or the host of other niceties that Draigo comes with. You need to keep in mind that there's a reason the Wolves have access to a character like Arjac and we don't, and it's not just points-cost...it's big-picture/codex-wide. Also, Arjac does not unlock Paladins as Troops...

 

Assuming your calcs are accurate, I'd happily assert that 0.37 wounds, 0.42 wounds, and 0.46 wounds are all functionally the same when you account for significant figures here. :lol: because either they're all zero or Draigo comes out very slightly ahead (0.5 vs 0.4).

I was just analyzing Draigo's combat performaces. I have been a fan of Draigo since they day I saw his codex entry so I don't have to be persuaded about how great he is :lol:

I was trying to investigate on his current "dueling capabilities" since it's what separates him from other Grand Masters, along side with Mastery 2 and S10 vs psyker, which I have mentioned in my first post.

For the purpose of this discussion unlocking paladins as troops is not relevant, since I said "a part from unlocking paladins" which is a very useful trait; there is no doubt about it.

 

As I said I was talking about Draigo prowess in combat, the other capabilities cannot be "nerfed".

The reason of my curiosity is the desire to use Draigo as the "more frequent warlord" from my GK since I really love the characters, thus the questions I posted :huh:

 

For the records: calculations come from a famous online calculator. The data were based on a charging Draigo.

 

Doesn't Draigo have mastery level 2?

 

I only use Draigo to unlock Paladins, and to help paladins survive. If I could take an army of paladins without him, then I would.

 

Accepting a challenge from Arjac with him depends on all the other factors in the combat, and while Arjac is 87 points cheaper, those 87 point's buy you a fair bit with Draigo, as Thade mentioned :P

 

If I could I'd use Draigo every time since I really the character ;)

Even in 6th there is no model in the game that I wouldn’t gladly challenge with Darigo. 3++ 4W Eternal Warrior will keep him alive long enough to land at least one hit. 4-5 S5(6) master crafted attacks that hits most things on a 3+, and instant death, will putt any would be hero in the ground. Logan and Lysander are 4W 2+ Eternal Warriors, but even they need to get 4 wounds past 3++ at I1 and Draigo only needs to get one attack through their 2+
Even in 6th there is no model in the game that I wouldn’t gladly challenge with Darigo. 3++ 4W Eternal Warrior will keep him alive long enough to land at least one hit. 4-5 S5(6) master crafted attacks that hits most things on a 3+, and instant death, will putt any would be hero in the ground. Logan and Lysander are 4W 2+ Eternal Warriors, but even they need to get 4 wounds past 3++ at I1 and Draigo only needs to get one attack through their 2+

 

No, he needs to get 4 attacks through, because they have Eternal Warrior. Draigo is by no means bad 1-on-1, but the SC game is much more rock, paper, scissors than it was before. Things like daemon princes do a real number on Lysander or any other I1 SC, while Draigo will eat a daemon prince for breakfast, possibly with fries. Logan is actually rather nasty as he gets to choose between high I AP3 attacks and low I AP2 attacks.

Even in 6th there is no model in the game that I wouldn’t gladly challenge with Darigo. 3++ 4W Eternal Warrior will keep him alive long enough to land at least one hit. 4-5 S5(6) master crafted attacks that hits most things on a 3+, and instant death, will putt any would be hero in the ground. Logan and Lysander are 4W 2+ Eternal Warriors, but even they need to get 4 wounds past 3++ at I1 and Draigo only needs to get one attack through their 2+

 

No, he needs to get 4 attacks through, because they have Eternal Warrior. Draigo is by no means bad 1-on-1, but the SC game is much more rock, paper, scissors than it was before. Things like daemon princes do a real number on Lysander or any other I1 SC, while Draigo will eat a daemon prince for breakfast, possibly with fries. Logan is actually rather nasty as he gets to choose between high I AP3 attacks and low I AP2 attacks.

 

This was my first impression on the matter. Logan may be a little more problematic. Deamon Prince does not stand a chace, of course, as it should be :D

 

By the way, it seems Draigo is still strong enough to meet the enemies "champions" blade to blade without easily giving the "slay the warlord" victory point to the opponent.

The unit is fun, but the character "Draigo" is the worst thing Ward's ever imagined for us. He's better at the Big E's job than the big E himself. According to his story, he should both cost and be worth 2000 points. He's silly. :(

 

Model is fun, though.

Even in 6th there is no model in the game that I wouldn’t gladly challenge with Darigo. 3++ 4W Eternal Warrior will keep him alive long enough to land at least one hit. 4-5 S5(6) master crafted attacks that hits most things on a 3+, and instant death, will putt any would be hero in the ground. Logan and Lysander are 4W 2+ Eternal Warriors, but even they need to get 4 wounds past 3++ at I1 and Draigo only needs to get one attack through their 2+

 

No, he needs to get 4 attacks through, because they have Eternal Warrior. Draigo is by no means bad 1-on-1, but the SC game is much more rock, paper, scissors than it was before. Things like daemon princes do a real number on Lysander or any other I1 SC, while Draigo will eat a daemon prince for breakfast, possibly with fries. Logan is actually rather nasty as he gets to choose between high I AP3 attacks and low I AP2 attacks.

 

I… I declare momentary insanity….

 

But I still hold firm that Draigo would win. Hi always wins. Master crafted and higher initiative will see him through. And he has the paladins to fall back on :(

The unit is fun, but the character "Draigo" is the worst thing Ward's ever imagined for us. He's better at the Big E's job than the big E himself. According to his story, he should both cost and be worth 2000 points. He's silly. :(

 

Model is fun, though.

I mean I like the stats to represent a custom-made Grand Master :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.