Jump to content

Runic Weapons


NovaScotius

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

This might be a stupid question, but I can't seem to find the answer to it.

 

Are Runic Weapons classed as Unusual Force Weapons?

 

I would say that they are, as they have a unique close combat rule (Regarding the wounding of Daemons), and are therefore Strength of the user and AP 3 regardless of what the weapon actually is.

 

I've got a friend who is adamant that as the roll to wound Daemons is a set value, regardless of the strength of the wielder, the Runic Wepon should count as what it is modelled to be.

 

Now I'm happy either way, but I really want to know how others are playing this, as I don't want to challenge a Veteran Sergeant with a Power Fist only to find that I'm swinging my Runic Axe as an unwieldy weapon and going simultaneously!

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/258772-runic-weapons/
Share on other sites

The answer lies in the phrasing on BRB p.60

 

"If a force weapon has its own unique close combat rules..."

 

Does a Runic weapon have a unique close combat rule? Yes.

 

 

I've had people argue that and that my Purifiers w/ NFHalberds strike on I:1 too...

Agreed. Normal Force Weapons don't wound Daemons on a 2+ regardless of Toughness, so this is unusual - therefore a Force Weapon which wounds Daemons on a 2+ regardless of Toughness is an unusual Force Weapon.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/258772-runic-weapons/#findComment-3146506
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to bring it up because I'd love the Runic weapon to be unusual for the AP 3 but unless it is stated in the FAQ that the weapon is unusual it is not. i.e. The Grey Knight FAQ does state their weapons are unusual, our FAQ does not so it is a force staff; +2 strength AP 4.

 

G

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/258772-runic-weapons/#findComment-3146524
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to bring it up because I'd love the Runic weapon to be unusual for the AP 3 but unless it is stated in the FAQ that the weapon is unusual it is not. i.e. The Grey Knight FAQ does state their weapons are unusual, our FAQ does not so it is a force staff; +2 strength AP 4.

 

G

:eek, no. It doesn't have to be specifically stated as being unusual in an FAQ. The BRB clearly defines Unusual Power Weapons and Unusual Force Weapons - and the Runic Weapon is one such.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/258772-runic-weapons/#findComment-3146532
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to bring it up because I'd love the Runic weapon to be unusual for the AP 3 but unless it is stated in the FAQ that the weapon is unusual it is not. i.e. The Grey Knight FAQ does state their weapons are unusual, our FAQ does not so it is a force staff; +2 strength AP 4.

 

G

 

I think the GK required more of a FAQ update because they have a large variety of force weapons. GW probably decided to take the bull by the horns and address them specifically. We have one type, which fits the unusual force weapon quite easily.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/258772-runic-weapons/#findComment-3146622
Share on other sites

because crozius has a name it is special so they changes all in to maces , because it always was a form of a 2ed/RT power maul . libbies force weapons do not have own rules [and there is the RT/2ed thing of staff/ax/sword having own different rules] so there was nothing to screw with . unless you count the hood change , but as a SW you dont care about that right ?
Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/258772-runic-weapons/#findComment-3146674
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.