TennisBall Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 I saw a post recently, sorry forget where, where the poster was quoting some GW type about the stormbird. The stormbird was considered a class of transport, not a particular design. Perhaps any assault lander that was designed to carry a company of astartes is a stormbird. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/261591-stormbird/page/2/#findComment-3186007 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dswanick Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 I saw a post recently, sorry forget where, where the poster was quoting some GW type about the stormbird. The stormbird was considered a class of transport, not a particular design. Perhaps any assault lander that was designed to carry a company of astartes is a stormbird. Which could make sense, what with the plethora of "Storm Eagle", "Storm Raven", etc... showing up recently. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/261591-stormbird/page/2/#findComment-3186029 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oir Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I saw a post recently, sorry forget where, where the poster was quoting some GW type about the stormbird. The stormbird was considered a class of transport, not a particular design. Perhaps any assault lander that was designed to carry a company of astartes is a stormbird. Which could make sense, what with the plethora of "Storm Eagle", "Storm Raven", etc... showing up recently. What about the Storm Talon? Although I suppose that scouts could hang on tightly.... xD On topic, I really like the model so far, I didn't really have a good mental image of a stormbird before seeing this thread, but that one seems on the mark. The boxy dropship thing just doesn't fit the description in the series. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/261591-stormbird/page/2/#findComment-3187078 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.