Olis Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Maybe it is suppose to be asymmetrical. That notion doesn't really make sense to me. Why would it be intentionally wonky? :lol: Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3237503 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim AMM realgenius Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Exactly, if it is supposed to be asymmetrical one side should be labeled "Primary Detachment" and the other "Allied Detachment" or should explain how to use it. There have been many charts like this in GW and FW books, but none work asymmetrically. It would be cool and fluffy though-- Blood Angels could take Sons of Horus allied detachment, but Sons of Horus won't bring in allied BAs. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3237511 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim AMM realgenius Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 And, although it is answered for me, I think a good FAQ would be "How do I unlock Phosphex shells for a Medusa?" because I looked all over the Wargear and Mechanicum lists before I found the one non-bulleted line under Siege Breaker Consul. Maybe I'm the only one that reads the Wargear section first? :lol: Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3237520 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Amarel Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 I had assumed, quite possibly wrongly, that you read across a row for the primary detachment and that some Legions would ally with others, but not vice versa. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3237557 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim AMM realgenius Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 I think you might be right, but there's some connecting of the dots that needs to be done. The Betrayal table says nothing about how to use it, just that it is a more nuanced version of the BRB allies chart and that it "works in a similar manner". The BRB does specify: "Find the row for the codex of you primary detachment on the left side... then find the column for your potential ally..." Of course, the BRB Allies chart is symmetrical, but having it be asymmetrical is a pretty cool way to differentiate the different loyalties. I wonder if there will be a different Ally chart in different books, as things evolve? I have a feeling eventually the White Scars aren't going to be Sworn Brothers with the Sons of Horus. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3237587 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim AMM realgenius Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 Is the Graviton Gun's Concussion same as the USR Concussive? I didn't see a separate Concussion in the Heresy book, but maybe I missed it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3239056 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SillyDreadnought Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 Is the Graviton Gun's Concussion same as the USR Concussive? I didn't see a separate Concussion in the Heresy book, but maybe I missed it. It is the same as the USR. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3239273 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Amarel Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 Can a Centurion swap both his Bolt Pistol and his CCW for one of the weapons listed? It states that they "may exchange either" one or the other, but this wording has been ruled before to be one or both. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3240091 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim AMM realgenius Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 but this wording has been ruled before to be one or both. Just out of curiosity, where was it ruled? I've always seen that specific language to mean only one or the other but not both. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3240159 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Amarel Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 It was quite a while back, possible C:SM. I was reminded of it recently in a discussion about C:CSM where it came up. I agree that it reads like it should be just one or the other (the classic use of 'either'), but I'll see if I can dig up the FAQ where it was stated before (although I may not still have it, tbh). Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3240195 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verythrax Draconis Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 A quick one: in the box for the Reconnaissance squads, it's said that Support Squads can't be taken as compulsory troop choices. -- but it's the entry for the Reconnaissance Squad, not the Support Squad one page before. The box is identical in both pages, so it seems to be a copy & paste error - but does it means that the recon squads should follow the same rule, of was it supposed to be a complete different box altogether? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3241896 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorenzen Posted November 19, 2012 Author Share Posted November 19, 2012 support squad is a special rule of sorts.. its listed alongside legiones astartes in their entry i believe. :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3241914 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim AMM realgenius Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 I got a FW email reply saying the Allies Chart is indeed asymmetrical. Primary detachment, pick your row and then find your allied detachment in the column. Also got confirmation on the Champion's rule should be Glorious Intervention and Veteran Upgrade for Siege squad should be removed. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/264067-question-for-fws-heresy-faq/page/2/#findComment-3250907 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.