Jump to content

Garro - not a Grey Knight


Aegnor

Recommended Posts

In the December White Dwarf, James Swallow is interviewed regarding Nathaniel Garro.

"But the questions I get asked most about Garro are about his future. Where will he end up? What is the significance of the colourless armour he wears in service to Malcador the Sigillite? Will he face Mortarion again? All these things will be answered in time, but I'll leave you with one revelation. He is not a Grey Knight. The question of who and what Nathaniel Garro is, and where his fate lies, is much more complicated than that..."

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/266448-garro-not-a-grey-knight/
Share on other sites

but more importantly, is he a giraffe?

 

WLK

Of course he is not. It's Sevatar.

 

And as for Garro, I always though of him as a first Inquisitor or something like that.

 

Sevatar's about as likely to be a giraffe as he would be to be a founding member of the Grey Knights (though I'd bet that would be real story). I agree about Garro, he seems more an Inquisitorial type.

Always suspected that he'd play at most a 'mentoring' role (if at all) to the first Grey Knights, rather than becoming a Grey Knight through-and-through. Since the "Flight of the Eisenstein" it's always been alluded to that Garro and co' had a much wider and varied role to play, as people of such an 'inquisitive nature'. Of course, James may also be hinting at the notion that Garro may not even make it through the war. Some other authors have already suggested that as we still have a while to go in the Heresy and that the line-up of warriors Garro has collected so far may not be the same people who go before Malcador again, to be told to set up the Inquisition/Grey Knights.

 

Hopefully James' quote puts a blocker on some of the conspiracies that Garro lends his geneseed to that of the Grey Knights or even becomes Grand Master Janus. Never liked either...

Never trust an author, especially when he spells something out so briefly and specifically. Ok, Garro won't be a Grey Knight, but he still could help to create the chapter, define their practices and for all intents and purposes be the "father" of the Grey Knights, all while not actually being one himself.

 

Or I could see the author say "He's not a Grey Knight, he's THE Grey Knight. There's a difference, see?". Yes, yes, all sound and fury signifying nothing.

It's semantics. Garro is obviously a Grey Knight for all intents and purposes, it's just that they might put something in like that the ex-Traitor Legion marines can only found the chapter and not actually lead it or count as amongst it to hide the fact that the GK were founded by members of those legions or something like that to make him "not a Grey Knight" but for story purposes it's bleeding obvious. Just like how it now seems that Sevatar will be a Grey Knight too. It's like Warhammer Oprah "You get to be a Grey Knight! And YOU get to be a Grey Knight! Everyone gets to be a Grey Knight!"

Of course Garro isn't a grey knight

 

He changes his name to Janus

 

We'll end up with a figure looking up at a wall with the names of the dead etched upon it, the wall will have Battle Captain Nathaniel Garro ---

 

Some one will come up behind him and ask him something like

 

"What is on your mind brother Janus?"

 

To which the reply will be along the lines of.

 

"Another life long ago, forgotten now save for one last reminder of everything lost."

 

And with that he'll turn away and never think of that life again

He is not a Grey Knight. The question of who and what Nathaniel Garro is, and where his fate lies, is much more complicated than that..."

 

Well Damm. Speaking for the Garro = Janus folks, this hurts. I will have to read the full interview to see if this is word play but this don't look "good".

No he is not a Grey Knight but somebody has to teach them how to be Space Marines and Dorn did say that most of the warriors that Malcador had Garro collecting where former Librarians. Draw your own conclusions. That said Garro doesn't seam cut out to be a Chapter Master to me and neither does Loken. They seam to much the Line Warriors.
Sevatar a grey knight? Not likely, he is quite insaine and prone to killing his own. I hope that was entended as sarcasm. As for the others, They have to live long enough to even consider the idea of them becoming GK. Thats a while aways and we will just ahve to wait and see who is left standing in the end. :)
He is not a Grey Knight. The question of who and what Nathaniel Garro is, and where his fate lies, is much more complicated than that..."

 

Well Damm. Speaking for the Garro = Janus folks, this hurts. I will have to read the full interview to see if this is word play but this don't look "good".

 

It's a literal quote. There is nothing else about it in the interview, except for "I'll leave you with one revelation" and then the above quote.

 

Taking it literally, of course he's not a Grey Knight, his gene seed is that of the Death Guard. It could still mean he is part of the chapter, in a similar way that a serf to Sicarius is not an Ultramarine. Obviously, Garro wouldn't be a servant.

 

I'm more inclined to think the librarians become the Grey Knights, whilst Garro is something else.

My money is on Omegon as Janus. Alpha legion have a spare primarch and it would be just like them if one of the brothers actually didnt agree with the other and kept his agenda to himself while influencing events in the oh so sneaky, clandestine(inquisitorial) way that they do?! The name Janus lends istself to this aswell given the alphas hydra iconography.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.