Jump to content

Question, Could not find the answer


montegue

Recommended Posts

In our Codex, it mentions that we can take more than the usual number of HQ in our lists. I couldn't find anything to contradict that in the FAQ. Did I read that wrong, or miss something? Army builder reads more than 2 HQ as a conflict, as does BattleScribe. 

 

I appreciate the help.

Yeah, Army Builder and Battlescribe are wrong here. Space Wolves can take 2 HQ units in one HQ slot, no problem. You do have to make sure they all have different sets of wargear as well as psychic powers. And Sagas are one per army apart from those on Unique charaters.

In our Codex, it mentions that we can take more than the usual number of HQ in our lists. I couldn't find anything to contradict that in the FAQ. Did I read that wrong, or miss something? Army builder reads more than 2 HQ as a conflict, as does BattleScribe. 

 

I appreciate the help.

Time to update your datafiles.  Both Army Builder and Battle Scribe handle the Leaders of the Pack rule correctly, and have for several years now.

Noticed Army Builder started flagging more than two HQ choices again with the latest update. Before it was per the codex, but still get flagged on sagas between a Unique and unnamed independent characters.

Then you've got something hinky going on - I'm running AB 3.4b with the AB40k.org v1.12 datafiles and don't have either of those problems you mention.

(Currently looking at a list with Logan Grimnar (Warlord), Wolf Lord w/Saga of Majesty, another Wolf Lord w/Bolter, 2X Grey Hunter packs and not getting any warnings...)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.