Tiger9gamer Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Hey guys! I looked around places for my chapter, but there isn't a lot :/ any one have additional fluff? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizara Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 There really isn't much fluff for any of the unforgiven successor chapters. Not sure why GW isn't putting more fluff out with each new codex, but the unforgiven chapters got hosed on fluf yet again, as well as any special characters of any sorts. The blood angels at least got a special character for a successor, which adds a tiny bit more fluff about that chapter. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3325642 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Master Belial Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 In my sig is my own personal view on the Successors that I did back in 3rd Ed and am slowly updating. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3325645 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger9gamer Posted March 11, 2013 Author Share Posted March 11, 2013 oh wow O-O that is awesome, GM belial! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3325655 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Komodo Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 FFG Deathwatch supplements (Rites of Battle and ... forgot another one) have some nice fluff on DA successors. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3325810 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger9gamer Posted March 12, 2013 Author Share Posted March 12, 2013 alright, studied the index thing and i have to say, cool job! they seem a little like know it alls, but that's fun :P any summery of it? i'm to slowed to read it sll the way through And comprehend it Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3325981 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Master Belial Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Think Shao-Lin monks with guns Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3325983 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rikera Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 I thought it was just because they were all so similiar. DA and their sucessors i mean. It does say in the dex once or twice that the DA have been overlooked and/or ignored due to rumours and fear of potential "legion building". The only reason they really have the sucessors in the first place is because at the time of the 2nd founding they didnt want any more attention than they needed right? I guess i like that its like that, also it leaves room for your own fluff...if thats your thing. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3326020 Share on other sites More sharing options...
facmanpob Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Think Shao-Lin monks with guns This made me laugh! :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3326050 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger9gamer Posted March 12, 2013 Author Share Posted March 12, 2013 I was thinking more European monks, as I get that vibe with the whole cathedal monestry. also the 'Tutores' idea comes off as cleaver but not as threatening >.< hope i'm not coming off as a jackarse about this Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3326254 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Immolator Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 I thought it was just because they were all so similiar. DA and their sucessors i mean. It does say in the dex once or twice that the DA have been overlooked and/or ignored due to rumours and fear of potential "legion building". The only reason they really have the sucessors in the first place is because at the time of the 2nd founding they didnt want any more attention than they needed right? I guess i like that its like that, also it leaves room for your own fluff...if thats your thing. However, millennia of separation are bound to create differences, both in views and organization. Though we know, the unforgiven use the DA standard methods some minor deviations for chapter to chapter wouldnt be unheard of. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3326298 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Master Belial Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Not at all. I encouraged the brethren to add their own ideas to the mix so that this would grow to be a B&C creation instead of one person's sole take on it. Originally in that article, the GotC were overseers of an Eldar Maiden World that they were protecting while the Mechanicum (hence the red robes) studied the buried wraithbone roots. It was tossed for the current idea. I'll need to re-read those Deathwing books to add their info to these articles as well. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/272633-fluff-for-the-guardians-of-the-covenant/#findComment-3326306 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.