cielaq Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 "if the To Hit re-roll is also a 1" - so both of the rolls must be 1 to suffer wound. So if you re-roll a 2 and get a 1, you suffer no wound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dswanick Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Clear RAI No, it's quite simple. If the re-roll is a 1, you take a Gets Hot wound. If your first roll is a 1 and your second roll is 1 you take the wound. If your first roll is a 2 and your second roll is a 1, you take the wound. The only roll that matters is the re-roll, just forget what the first one was for the purposes of Gets Hot. What the rulebook is referring to there is the fact that when you roll a 1, you'll only suffer Gets Hot on another roll of a 1. One valid interpretation of RAW "if the To Hit re-roll is also a 1" - so both of the rolls must be 1 to suffer wound. So if you re-roll a 2 and get a 1, you suffer no wound.This is where context becomes important - the "also a one" statement is within the context of having already rolled a one. It is just a reinforcement of the earlier general rule that when re-rolling a die the re-rolled outcome is completely ignored in favor of the new outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkGuard Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 "if the To Hit re-roll is also a 1" - so both of the rolls must be 1 to suffer wound. So if you re-roll a 2 and get a 1, you suffer no wound. As dswanick has said, it's to do with context. The RAI is clearly a 1 on the re-roll is Gets Hot. This is just bad rules writing by GW. You can try to enforce this in a game if you wish, but be prepared for an argument and righteously upset/mad opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.