DarkGuard Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 New FAQs, must be Christmas: http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?categoryId=1000018&pIndex=1&aId=3000006&multiPageMode=true&start=2 I must say, I'm impressed at how quickly GW are getting these out, but I don't mind some of the quality. The hit to DW Sergeants has all sorts upset in the DA forum and I don't blame them. But there are some good clarifications, someone from GW must have been reading our recent threads on Interceptors and Pods. I've only started looking through them, so have at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interrogator-Chaplain Ezra Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 *looks at FAQ* The hit to DW Sergeants has all sorts upset in the DA forum and I don't blame them. What hit? I didn't... *rereads FAQ, closer this time* SON OF A.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam13n Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Don't the DW sergeants have access to the terminator weapons part of the wargear list then? If they do then this just brings them into line with Chaos Terminator Champions who pay a premium for their weapon upgrades. If not, then I agree - stupid call GW (once again) The rest of the FAQs seem reasonable at first glance though. GW have tried to clear up some of the recent hot-topics that have been debated in the OR forum. (With varying levels of success of course). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interrogator-Chaplain Ezra Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Don't the DW sergeants have access to the terminator weapons part of the wargear list then? If they do then this just brings them into line with Chaos Terminator Champions who pay a premium for their weapon upgrades. If not, then I agree - stupid call GW (once again) The rest of the FAQs seem reasonable at first glance though. GW have tried to clear up some of the recent hot-topics that have been debated in the OR forum. (With varying levels of success of course). No, he doesn't, and the list only covers combi-weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkGuard Posted April 24, 2013 Author Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'm sure is a typo there. What must be applauded in that one is how they ruled on RW Command squads getting 2 more people. Blast weapon rules are silly though, in that if they scatter out of LoS they still wound etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyroknight Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Didn't even think about the sarge. Thanks for pointing that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Emperor's Champion Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Blast weapon rules are silly though, in that if they scatter out of LoS they still wound etc. Why in the world would they not??? A Missile that gets knocked off course around a wall will still explode.... Just because you can't see what the explosion is hitting doesn't mean it's not exploding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morollan Posted April 27, 2013 Share Posted April 27, 2013 I'm sure is a typo there. What must be applauded in that one is how they ruled on RW Command squads getting 2 more people. Blast weapon rules are silly though, in that if they scatter out of LoS they still wound etc. No, what was silly was that the rules previously said that you could allocate wounds to models out of LOS but could not resolve them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.