Jump to content

Guess the Emperor!


Joeyray

Recommended Posts

Morning brothers

Just a quick after closing shift thought that came to me, why don't we speculate what historical figures the Emperor took up in order to guide history for his grand designs.

I'd vote for Napoleon, Bismarck, Frederick the Great and possibly Prince Metternich. Each of these men sho ok the world and especially Europe which to me echos down to us in the present.

Your thoughts?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/277666-guess-the-emperor/
Share on other sites

Isn't it said that he always stayed behind the scenes, never taking the reigns until he becomes the Emperor, while still influencing the course of humanity?

 

That sounds to me to be more like heroes rather than leaders. Martyrs, like Jesus. Hercules, Beowulf. Rather than Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar.

I don't remember any quotes saying he took active control. I remember quotes saying you can see his influence clearly in history but he never took "command" until he became the Emperor. The cognosynths, for instance, sounded like they were taken out by an unknown warrior rather than a warlord.

Cormac - I think the fluff said that he never revealed his true power and nature until he became the Emperor - not that he was never a ruler.

 

I don't think anyone like Napoleon or Bismarck etc were the Emperor. They aren't 'big' enough in terms of changing course of humanity.

 

I'd guess Alexander the Great, Confuscious, Jesus, Muhammad, Genghis Khan, I reckon the American founding fathers might have included a Malcador/Emperor double act, and the Einstein.

 

Plus lots more instances where he never became famous, but acted as a catalyst to other innovations or changes taking place.

 

 

I don't think anyone like Napoleon or Bismarck etc were the Emperor. They aren't 'big' enough in terms of changing course of humanity.

 

 

I beg to differ Aegnor, they may not be world renown  but they helped to shape Europe as it is today and if the Big E wanted to direct humanity towards his grand designs then he would need to be more than some distant mythical figure.  I see it as if we don't have him under the guise of Bismarck then we have no Germany, without Germany we get no Cold War and the technology that came from it, such as improved rockets and missiles which will lead onto early space exploration and so on until humanity develops into colonisation of our neighbours.

I respect your input and agree that he was not every "Big Man" in history, just some fun speculation, of course he was Elvis, that is a giving. 

Definitely Bismarck. I'm willing to bet that at some point, the Emperor has tried every approach. So I think he's been a martyr, political leader, peace activist, General, conqueror, everything really. 

 

So we have Bismarck, maybe Gandhi, I could see a US founding father, probably a few scientists, (I also just want to throw Henry the Navigator in the there.) Most major religious figures, probably at least half of the great conquerors, (Khan, Alexander, Charlemagne). There's quite a few people. I also imagine he was one of the founders of NASA. 

I kind of doubt the Emperor was every major religous leader ever, given his feelings on the subject in "The Last Church."

 

Plus, it seems to me that it cheapens humanity as a whole if all our great warriors, leaders, inventors, philosophers, etc. were the same immortal guy in disguise.

 

 

Plus, it seems to me that it cheapens humanity as a whole if all our great warriors, leaders, inventors, philosophers, etc. were the same immortal guy in disguise.

 

I would have to say that as part of the human psyche, we tend to look up to those "Great" leaders throughout history so if the Big E was some, if not all then it is just a carrying on of the Tradition for when he unveils himself and that most of the masses will look up to him with the same awe that we give to other figures in many different fields. 

I kind of doubt the Emperor was every major religous leader ever, given his feelings on the subject in "The Last Church."

 

Plus, it seems to me that it cheapens humanity as a whole if all our great warriors, leaders, inventors, philosophers, etc. were the same immortal guy in disguise.

It's possible that his view on religion is because of really bad treatment in an incarnation of a religious figure, a question of faith. And that as a result, his faith went from "gods" to "secular".

I've always entertained the notion that just because he was "guiding humanity" doesn't necessarily mean he was always someone great and benevolent in our history, I imagine that he could easily go from being Da Vinci to Adolf Hitler or Alexander the Great.  You look at the sheer brutality brought forth by Primarchs and Space Marines and things like the Third Reich pale in comparison.  From what we have seen of the Emperor he is a being that will do whatever is necessary to see his agenda met. 

It might not have anything to do with his own faith. After all, he was one of the only ones to know the truth. But hr may easily have attempted to use religion as a means to control the masses, a control that slips away from him so easily that he refuses to attempt it again and sees no further use for it when it runs contrary to his original plans for it.

 

For instance, if he was Jesus he may have been intending to control Judaism. But instead he is rejected by them and his teachings are corrupted into an entirely different religion that in many ways are contradictory to his, meaning Jesus', intent. Ultimately, this bastard child religion even goes on to aid in the birth of a Chaos God, going by Khorne's ascension to Godhood during the Crusades.

I kind of doubt the Emperor was every major religous leader ever, given his feelings on the subject in "The Last Church."

 

 

Well he speaks about vices of religions but doesn't mention their virtues. F.I. crusades were a huge milestone for humanity's advance despite of their all brutality. Big E can use religion to some point, then it becomes useless to him.

Let me clarify a bit further:

 

I don't have a problem with the Emperor being a few important figures in history, especially mythical heroes like Romulus/Remus, Gilgamesh, or King Arthur.

 

It's "He's every exceptional individual ever" that sticks in my craw. It's not as if we're speaking of ALPHARIUS here...:p

 

Now, as for the Crusades birthing Khorne, I have and always will maintain that a galaxy spanning eldar empire causing Slaanesh to manifest while one planet full of humans made the other three Ruinous Powers is silly, and needs to be placed on the same pyre as half eldar Ultramarine Librarians.

 

I prefer Khorne's description in the Black Crusade gamebook, "As long as brother has slain brother, wolf has hunted wolf, and stars have devoured their planets, Khorne has existed, and he will continue to do so as long as these things still occur."

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.