Jump to content

Who kills whom?


marshal seanisi

Recommended Posts

Lol you might want to hide that from the mods haha

 

 

dont worry Jeff has already sought out his unloving maker to create a wife for him so he stops his vengeance cycle.

 

 

 

Lorgars still afraid that jeff will get a divorce though, so hes still hiding from him...and writing the next GnR album :D

Bjorn becomes the the first great wolf lord and about 100 years or so he gets mortally wound on a quest to find Russ

 

The reason he is called bjorn the fell handed was because in the fall of propero he killed a thousand but the warrior said a spell or did somthing that made bjorn hand going infected with something and it kept getting worse so Constantin Valdor cut it off and saved his life

Bjorn becomes the the first great wolf lord and about 100 years or so he gets mortally wound on a quest to find Russ

 

The reason he is called bjorn the fell handed was because in the fall of propero he killed a thousand but the warrior said a spell or did somthing that made bjorn hand going infected with something and it kept getting worse so Constantin Valdor cut it off and saved his life

 

That's pretty much been thrown in the trash now. He does indeed lose his arm but, well, read Prospero Burns for the current version

Yup the new version is MUCH more fun :p

 

Imagine a 4-way, Amit, Khan, Lucius and Sevatar - no rules/boundaries - last man standing wins.

It would be a three way bout with Lucius whining about something before Amit or Khârn behead him. Then Amit and Khârn battle it out till one remains. Likely Khârn. As Khârn is about to find new enemies he realizes that it was actually a 4 way rumble and Sevatar swoops down and guts him. Shouting "tadaaaaas" ...or whispering it.

Why does this remind me so much of a rugby match my brother played in Afghan - it was Ghurkas + British Inf vs US Marines + British Marines... Aparently it was more violent than 6 months in Sangin... but very off topic :p

 

I've not read much of the heresy but I'd love to see Corswain vs Sigismund or Bjorn vs Raldoran - I find the loyalist vs traitor fights (even pre-heresy outbreak) a little of the same, however loyalist vs loyalist rarely seems to happen - plus it'd be funny to see Corswain gut Sigismund who then beheads him on the return - or Bjorn (who favoured a lightning claw if memory serves) take Raldorans arm off but lose his own... Ahh perhaps I wish for too much :p

Well based on the rules in Massacre.  FW seem to love Sevatar based on the WS and I values they gave him.  Same WS as Khârn but +1 I.  We will see what they do with Sigismund, but if they are keeping true to the story line, he should be at least the same stats as Sevatar if not better.

Why does this remind me so much of a rugby match my brother played in Afghan - it was Ghurkas + British Inf vs US Marines + British Marines... Aparently it was more violent than 6 months in Sangin... but very off topic tongue.png

Dude, that's not Rugby. That's a mosh pit.

I have nothing of real value to add to this discussion. I just need to say that the original title of this topic ("Who Kills Who?") was killing me and my grammar OCD. I have, therefore, modified the title so that it is grammatically correct (or at least less grammatically incorrect msn-wink.gif ).

Why does this remind me so much of a rugby match my brother played in Afghan - it was Ghurkas + British Inf vs US Marines + British Marines... Aparently it was more violent than 6 months in Sangin... but very off topic tongue.png

Dude, that's not Rugby. That's a mosh pit.

That's not a mosh pit, that's Sparta!

Maybe you should read "Prince of Crows" one more time. Sevatar disqualified himself. Sigismund just laughed at him. Didn't say a word.

Yes and? It doesn't change the fact that he only held Sevatar to a draw when both fighters held to some sort of elegant fancy dan honorable swordsmen are we rule set.

 

If they'd been duelling aboard Conqueror (where the first rule is, we don't talk about the fighting pits. The second rule is, we don't talk about the fighting pits...) I imagine the outcome would have been a bit different.

it doesn't say where the duel took place.  It only says Sigismund was "the only warrior ever to beat him to a deadlock in over a hundred years of warfare" .  Hundreds of warriors from both legions looked on.  So regardless of where the battle takes place,  the outcome is presumed to be the same.

I have nothing of real value to add to this discussion. I just need to say that the original title of this topic ("Who Kills Who?") was killing me and my grammar OCD. I have, therefore, modified the title so that it is grammatically correct (or at least less grammatically incorrect msn-wink.gif ).

It was a reference to Tex Avery's Classic Cartoon short based on the old whodunit parody. "who killed who" 1943 Sorry it was a bit cheesy I know.

 

it doesn't say where the duel took place. It only says Sigismund was "the only warrior ever to beat him to a deadlock in over a hundred years of warfare" . Hundreds of warriors from both legions looked on. So regardless of where the battle takes place, the outcome is presumed to be the same.

You really think fighting under a rule set where spitting in someone's face, punching them...pretty much anything except pulling out a bolt pistol and shooting them mid fight is allowed instead of Sigismund's "Verily, thou art disqualified for thy unsportsmanlike headbutt" rules wouldn't change anything?

 

 

it doesn't say where the duel took place. It only says Sigismund was "the only warrior ever to beat him to a deadlock in over a hundred years of warfare" . Hundreds of warriors from both legions looked on. So regardless of where the battle takes place, the outcome is presumed to be the same.

You really think fighting under a rule set where spitting in someone's face, punching them...pretty much anything except pulling out a bolt pistol and shooting them mid fight is allowed instead of Sigismund's "Verily, thou art disqualified for thy unsportsmanlike headbutt" rules wouldn't change anything?

You are implying that they are Sigismund's rules.  That is the only point of contention I have with what you are saying.  Sigismund didn't stop the duel and say " hey you head butted me your disqualified"  It specifically states that Sevatar disqualified himself!  I can't imagine that at the gates of Terra when Sigismund defeated over 2 dozen Traitor Champions, that they were all "honorable duels"

I'm just saying there's a difference in fighting Sevatar under the Code Duello or whatever other rule set the Sigismund duel was under, and taking him on No Holds Barred.

 

Like taking on an MMA fighter in a boxing match vs taking him on in MMA.

Agreed....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.