Jump to content

Non-Military Legion Organization


Marshal Rohr

Recommended Posts

Alright, so the nomenclature amongst the various 'military' Legions is pretty straight forward, with the names varying, but meaning similar things (Orders, Battalions, Companies, Centuria,etc).

 

What about the legions who don't have something similar to western models of organization like the Space Wolves and White Scars? The Luna Wolves had companies, but by Isstvan V, that meant little and they were pretty much just Warbands. Would the Space Wolves use a battalion and company structure within their Great Companies? Would you find a V Tactical Centuria in the Space Wolves or White Scars?

 

 

Anybody who has read Scars care to lend some aid?

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/285601-non-military-legion-organization/
Share on other sites

All of the legions started with the basic layout from Betrayal.  As for the specifics for the scars or the wolves... i am doubting we will find more than hints in the Black Library books, as they rarely go and explain the structure of any given legion.

 

For the wolves, we know they were set at 13 companies... but how big those companies were depends on how large the legion as a whole is.

 

I have no clue how the scars modified the original tactical organizations.

I think of the Space wolves as this way:

 

13 Grand Companys (the commander wolf lord I always call a "Jarl", which is a skandinavian lord/king), and then I think their organization is the same as in the 41st millenium, with the elites being the wolf guard, or as I like to call them "Housecarls - Huskarle" and the Centurions would be the WG battle leaders or "Thanes".

 

Thats the way I see it.

So chieftain wouldn't apply in either of these cases?

Well, in Scars, the Brotherhood of the Storm had five hundred Astartes and it wouldnt be the first time a company organization was broken down into smaller organizations.

 

Also, Betrayal isn't entirely matching up with Scars as it says a Lord Commander would be the Khan.

 

And Five Hundred Astartes were typically a "battlaion" according to Betrayal.

 

So honestly, what we could do(since apparently we do have freedom to move around) is

 

Horde=Chapter; Noyan-Khan=Lord Command

 

Brotherhood=Battalion; Khan=Battalion Commander

 

?=Company; Chieftan=Centurion/Captain/Whatever

For Scars, you could just go with the medieval Mongol decimal system with units of 10 (arban), 100 (yaghun), 1,000 (minghan) and 10,000 (tumen).

 

A Noyan-Khan would normally command the latter, but they were also known to command a minghan.

 

This system was quite common across steppe armies.

Well, no, I am not saying that.

 

Just pointing it out if he saw Chieftains on the chart and thought it might apply to the Scars or Wolves. There may be overlap, common use, but we know that it is an Iron Hands designation, in command of the Clans.

Chieftans are clan commanders in the Iron Hands. Think the Lord Commanders in te Emperor's Children.

 

According to Betrayal, in the SoH, Chieftan is an honorary rank given to a sergeant who is put in charge of warband, which is an ad hoc formation of squads, either within a company, or made up of detachments from several companies.

There's also the possibility of 'Honourary' titles existing, which can give us some fun fluff to play with. In a few of my Iron Warriors stories, I made mention of the CVIII Azvaran, a title I plucked from ancient Persian history, from a mercenary group that was renown for their blade work. I liked the title, I liked the concept, I liked applying it to a IX Legion Void Assault Group, so I ran with it.

 

I'm always down with adding a realistic edge to everything 30k, but there's a point where some things should just remain fun.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.