Jump to content

Primarch Weapon Variety (or lack thereof)


Mazryonh

Recommended Posts

 

 

 

Perhaps the marines held the Orks at bay similar to how the Spartans held the Persians at Thermopylae. Ive never read that book. I just find it hard to believe that Astartes, masters of combat in the 41st millennium, would employ a battlefield formation that could potentially allow their enemy to outflank them. Admittedly, they were facing orks, but why risk it? Just because you can hold them at bay with a spear? I'd rather whither them down at range and then meet them head on with my deadlier training and expertly crafted CC weapons.

 

It's been a while, but if memory serves, the Iron Snakes were deployed in a long line on a ridgeline or hilltop and crunched an ork charge with massed bolters, then swapped out to their spears, at which point phalanx tactics became the order of the day.

To begin with, ALEXANDER was the undisputed master of the phalanx.

 

He and his dad Phillip of Macedon were the ones to give their soldiers the 21 foot long sarissas most people think of when they picture a phalanx.

 

Second, Alexander never fought the Spartans. Philip contemplated an invasion, and even went so far as sending missives to the Spartans they should submit to him, because if he went to war with them and won he'd kill all the men and enslave their women and children.

 

The lords of Sparta sent back a single word in reply.

 

"If".

 

Phillip decided to go invade other people, and Alex followed in his course.

 

As far as the rest, all I'll say is that your knowledge of tactics compares favorably to your grasp of ancient history.

I don't really understand why maces are AP4 only because those things just crunch into armor and give you massive internal bleeding and/or broken bones. Not to mention the fact that if you knock someone in the head with one it would easily knock it off their body or cause serious brain trauma enough to impair even a space marine.

 

Idk I just feel that maces are not represented well within 30/40k rules aside from the Primarch sized ones... :(

I don't really understand why maces are AP4 only because those things just crunch into armor and give you massive internal bleeding and/or broken bones. Not to mention the fact that if you knock someone in the head with one it would easily knock it off their body or cause serious brain trauma enough to impair even a space marine.

Idk I just feel that maces are not represented well within 30/40k rules aside from the Primarch sized ones... sad.png

They aren't, but at the same time if your in power armor you might actually survive getting hit with a mace, terminator armor can handle tank shells quite well so a mace is minor. This is part of the reason the power maul has the highest strength out of all the power weapons, and someone failing a save is basically that moment the mace hits the skull. Besides it does just fine against everything it's supposed to mulch ie. 4+ saves and worse.

My issue is with the power lance, it needs an boost to Initiative, and the bonus should be in the first round of combat. It doesn't matter if your charging or getting charged, spears and other polearms have every advantage in the opening of any fight. That's what makes defensive formations so brutal, and why marines using such weapons and tactics are impossible to beat. Either day to their ranged power, or die trying to slip past their spears. You lose either way.

Actually the Spartans clashed with Alexander's general, Antipater near Megalopolis but you are correct in that neither Philip nor his son ever fought the Spartans. My mistake pinch.gif

But I wouldnt call Alexander or his father the masters of the phalanx. They didnt even prefer it to other methods. They certainly revolutionized it by adding longer spears and stringing one side out farther than the other side. They also used cavalry in wedge formations to hit the enemies flanks. This method destroyed the traditional Hoplite phalanx that the Greek states were so partial to. I would also disagree that most people associate the sarissa with the phalanx (unless you mean Macedonian phalanx). It certainly makes a good counter to the hoplite phalanx though.

All of this is interesting but it doesnt address the fact that the tactic is outdated.

I cant argue with a BL story because that battle and its tactics are now a part of the lore. If people choose to believe Astartes prefer spears in CC thats their opinion and I wont begrudge them for it. Its probably a cool story and I plan on checking it out now.

My Astartes prefer other tactics though.

OT, I would love to read a story of a marine or primarch wasting fools with a spear.

I have a personal formula to deal with this trickiest and stickiest of subjects.

 

"Spears are awesome. Simply awesome. People who don't think spears are awesome are, themselves, not awesome." -- Aaron W. Dembski-Bowden, age 33 and 1/2.

 

Debate over.

Nah, I wouldn't say Marines prefer spears, chainswords, combat blades, and powerwhatevers are pretty much the order of the day.

 

And tercios/phalanxes/pike squares/etc are going to be a bit unwieldy for the usual battlefield role of a Space Marine, i.e. dropping out of the sky to unleash the matchless wrath of the Emperor incarnate (replace "dropped out of sky" with "stormed forth from rolling metal box" where appropriate).

I'm more of an axe person, but axes aren't really the best weapon in a 1 on 1 situation (assuming equivalent strength). They are perfect for Space Marines, though, especially assault squads, who mainly drop down and sweep whatever's in their path.

I have a personal formula to deal with this trickiest and stickiest of subjects.

 

"Spears are awesome. Simply awesome. People who don't think spears are awesome are, themselves, not awesome." -- Aaron W. Dembski-Bowden, age 33 and 1/2.

Yeah, but how do they compare to glaives? That's the question.

I have a personal formula to deal with this trickiest and stickiest of subjects.

 

"Spears are awesome. Simply awesome. People who don't think spears are awesome are, themselves, not awesome." -- Aaron W. Dembski-Bowden, age 33 and 1/2.

 

This is why I love Halberds so much. It's essentially just a spear, with an axe on one side. Axes are awesome too, so it's two awesome weapons on a long pole that can carve through multiple people.

Any more examples of characters using spears to stab me in the heart with? No? tongue.png

I would like to point out that I was saying spear tactics have no use in 40k because they have bolters. I'm not underestimating the effectiveness of a phalanx when facing a charge, but decent ranged units win every time, especially if they're using a massive gun that fires self-propelled explosive bolts that literally blow you apart from the inside.

The Custodes Guardian Spears are the best of both really, a spear that fires bolt rounds. How ironic that they don't fight in formation.

And Pfffff ADB, nothing is more awesome than an axe. Gimli has an axe.

Any more examples of characters using spears to stab me in the heart with? No? tongue.png

I would like to point out that I was saying spear tactics have no use in 40k because they have bolters. I'm not underestimating the effectiveness of a phalanx when facing a charge, but decent ranged units win every time, especially if they're using a massive gun that fires self-propelled explosive bolts that literally blow you apart from the inside.

The Custodes Guardian Spears are the best of both really, a spear that fires bolt rounds. How ironic that they don't fight in formation.

And Pfffff ADB, nothing is more awesome than an axe. Gimli has an axe.

Gimli actually has more than one axe, and one doubles as a walking stick.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.