netminder69 Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 Am I missing something or does the Whirlwind Hyperios ANTI-AIR DEFENSE tank in IA2v2 missing the Skyfire rule/rules for it's weapon? EDIT: Nevermind... I foudn the weapon rules in the back. Seems strange it's not with the tank's datasheet. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/289531-whirldwind-hyperios-not-skyfire/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axagoras Posted April 14, 2014 Share Posted April 14, 2014 well its using a guns profile that has skyfire, so putting it on the tank would give its storm bolters sky fire. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/289531-whirldwind-hyperios-not-skyfire/#findComment-3652695 Share on other sites More sharing options...
netminder69 Posted April 15, 2014 Author Share Posted April 15, 2014 What struck me was it also had no entry for the Hyperios weapon in the entry. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/289531-whirldwind-hyperios-not-skyfire/#findComment-3653109 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disruptor_fe404 Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 That's only because the Hyperios Launcher is used on other units too. I think the first instance of the Hyperios Launcher is with the Land Raider variant that has it, since the Land Raider section is before the Rhino section and they don't repeat profiles except in the table at the back. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/289531-whirldwind-hyperios-not-skyfire/#findComment-3654207 Share on other sites More sharing options...
netminder69 Posted April 16, 2014 Author Share Posted April 16, 2014 That makes sense, although the LR Helios (the one that can take it) doesn't have the wargear rules for the Hyperios either. It seems to be back of the book only. :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/289531-whirldwind-hyperios-not-skyfire/#findComment-3654501 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.