ZONKEY Posted June 21, 2014 Share Posted June 21, 2014 Silly question really, but do you prefer angrons legion being called the world eaters or the war hounds? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Juan Juarez Posted June 21, 2014 Share Posted June 21, 2014 Minor technicality but technically they didn't really become Angron's Legion until they became the World Eaters - I would say the mentality, just based on what they became with Angron, would have been wildly different. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3725313 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZONKEY Posted June 21, 2014 Author Share Posted June 21, 2014 Even under angrons control I prefer the name war hounds as I lie the thought of them being brutal savage dogs rippibg enemies to shreds Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3725359 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olis Posted June 21, 2014 Share Posted June 21, 2014 I preferred the Legion before they became the World Eaters, especially after FW handled them. War Hounds all the way. :D Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3725365 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xin Ceithan Posted June 21, 2014 Share Posted June 21, 2014 When the nails sing, who cares about nomenclature ,,,, Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3725383 Share on other sites More sharing options...
qyntius Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 The legion has never been war hounds under Angron's command. I prefer World Eaters because as Angron said, although in better wording, dogs are submissive pets. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3732439 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZONKEY Posted June 29, 2014 Author Share Posted June 29, 2014 I was thinking from a design point of view Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3732455 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of the Raven Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 I might start a War Hounds army in 2015 if Sisters of Battle aren't given plastics by then, but I prefer the color scheme of the World Eaters even to my personalized War Hounds scheme. Besides, the World Eaters go on to become slaves to bloodshed who swap tactical thinking for a boring color scheme. Besides again, I love the idea of the War Hounds being the Emperor's real executionners as opposed to those fleabags, regardless of whether I believe they indeed were or not. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3732527 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plague Angel Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 This is one of those Legions where I think all of their states -- Legio XII, then the War Hounds, then the Heresy-era World Eaters, and finally 40k Berzerkers -- are only really understood and interesting in context of each other. It's a Legion thick with irony and inevitability. The War Hounds color scheme was better, I think, but "World Eaters" is a much more evocative name. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3732955 Share on other sites More sharing options...
incinerator950 Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 I like both. I had another concet WE warband using a WH scheme with Red instead of Blue. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/292784-world-eaters-or-war-hounds/#findComment-3733216 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.