Jump to content

Rites of War: Only with Master of Legion?


Recommended Posts

I'm reading the part of the Master of the Legion entry in the most recent mini copy of the Legion Crusade Army List and I'm wonder whether it's a must to have a praetor for a rite of war

 

"The use of one of the Riters of War is always optional as they impose limitations on your army as well as offering other abilities and new configurations of units on the Force Organisation Chart."

 

 

I'm trying to get a 1k force of word bearers with some daemon allies for a game this weekend as I've only just started the army but atm it seems I need like three HQs, them being the praetor for master of the legion, a diabolist as it's required for the rite and a chaplain as it's reqired by word bearers in general.

Not having the mini copy, I can't be sure of the context, but the context is inferred by the text section that it appears in book one and also has the same optional text. I can't really see them changing needing a character with Master of the Legion to take a Rite of War.

 

As for the number of character required under the Word Bearer Rite of War, three is the number: Praetor for RoW, Centurion or Chaplain consul per the Word Bearer special rules and a Diabolist per the RoW.

 

Now the conjecture comes as to whether Erebus counts as both a Praetor and a Diabolist, yes he is a Chaplain, but the Legion Astartes Word Bearer rules state that you must take the extra character anyway!

Not having the mini copy, I can't be sure of the context, but the context is inferred by the text section that it appears in book one and also has the same optional text. I can't really see them changing needing a character with Master of the Legion to take a Rite of War.

 

As for the number of character required under the Word Bearer Rite of War, three is the number: Praetor for RoW, Centurion or Chaplain consul per the Word Bearer special rules and a Diabolist per the RoW.

 

Now the conjecture comes as to whether Erebus counts as both a Praetor and a Diabolist, yes he is a Chaplain, but the Legion Astartes Word Bearer rules state that you must take the extra character anyway!

I read an email from someone who contacted forgeworld and asked how both Erebus and Kor Phaeron count, and they replied that Erebus counts as both a Diabolist and a Chaplain whilst Kor Phaeron only counts as a Chaplain.

Not having the mini copy, I can't be sure of the context, but the context is inferred by the text section that it appears in book one and also has the same optional text. I can't really see them changing needing a character with Master of the Legion to take a Rite of War.

As for the number of character required under the Word Bearer Rite of War, three is the number: Praetor for RoW, Centurion or Chaplain consul per the Word Bearer special rules and a Diabolist per the RoW.

Now the conjecture comes as to whether Erebus counts as both a Praetor and a Diabolist, yes he is a Chaplain, but the Legion Astartes Word Bearer rules state that you must take the extra character anyway!

I read an email from someone who contacted forgeworld and asked how both Erebus and Kor Phaeron count, and they replied that Erebus counts as both a Diabolist and a Chaplain whilst Kor Phaeron only counts as a Chaplain.

The question is now does Erebus fulfill all three requirements of the RoW! huh.png

Some how I think not, so you could get Master of the Legion and Diabolist or Chaplain and need a Chaplain/Centurion or Diabolist, cutting the required number of characters to two, but if you don't want a named character then three seems to be the number. biggrin.png

Erebus lets you take Daemons as allies anyway even without the Rite of War. So I could just take Erebus and I guess an additional chaplain and have the allies without the rite of war. I only have a chaplain and a diabolist model though atm.

So I made this list, is it legal then after jumping through the hoops with the characters?

 

 

HQ

Erebus - 195
Centurion - Pair of Lightning Claws / Artificer Armour -  85
 
Herald of Khorne / Locus of Fury / Greater Reward - 95
 
Elites
 
Cataphractii Terminator Squad - 2 Power Swords / 3 Power Fists / Reaper Autocannon - 205
 
Troops
 
Legion Tactical Squad (x10) -  Power Weapon - 150
Legion Tactical Squad (x10) -  Power Weapon - 150
 
Bloodletters (x10) - 100
 
- 1000

 
Also since Daemons ain't my primary detachment do I ignore the warp storm table?

 

 

You could make your Praetor a Diabolist y'know. It's an option for all WB HQ's.

 

Where is this rule? I can't find it on page 254 or 255 of Massacre.

 

Ah, darn. Yeah, I misread it. My bad!

 

 

Hey, no problem, I thought I might have missed something!

  • 7 months later...

I'm reading the part of the Master of the Legion entry in the most recent mini copy of the Legion Crusade Army List and I'm wonder whether it's a must to have a praetor for a rite of war

So, what is the answer to this particular question? If a legion centurion is your warlord, does he have the Master of the Legion special rule?

Also in that book:  "If the army's Warlord [(see BRB)], they have the Master of the Legion special rule."  A centurion can be the army's warlord, so wouldn't that mean they have the Master of the Legion special rule? 

 

In the preceding paragraph, however, it states that "a model with [the Master of the Legion] special rule may also include a Command squad as a retinue."  Additionally, the Command squad's Retinue special rule states that it "may only be chosen as a retinue for a Legion Praetor or Legion special character with the Warlord special rule...."  Finally, the special rules for Praetor include "Master of the Legion," whereas the special rules for centurion do not. 

 

I didn't think a centurion could be a "Master of the Legion," but the language cited at the top made me wonder.  Perhaps just poor drafting?

Also in that book:  "If the army's Warlord [(see BRB)], they have the Master of the Legion special rule."  A centurion can be the army's warlord, so wouldn't that mean they have the Master of the Legion special rule? 

 

In the preceding paragraph, however, it states that "a model with [the Master of the Legion] special rule may also include a Command squad as a retinue."  Additionally, the Command squad's Retinue special rule states that it "may only be chosen as a retinue for a Legion Praetor or Legion special character with the Warlord special rule...."  Finally, the special rules for Praetor include "Master of the Legion," whereas the special rules for centurion do not. 

 

I didn't think a centurion could be a "Master of the Legion," but the language cited at the top made me wonder.  Perhaps just poor drafting?

 

Poor wording, the only centurion that has Master of the Legion is the new Consul-Delegatus and thats his entire purpose, to be a cheaper version of a praetor while also being able to choose RoWs, if any other Centurion could use RoWs then the existence of a Delegatus is pointless.

It's unclear. Very poorly written, as per. 

 

It refers to models with the rule, then states that if they're the Warlord, then they have the rule.

 

It's unclear whether it means that all Warlords have the Master of the Legion rule, or it has the pointless rule that only Warlords with the Master of the Legion gain the special rule.

 

In my suggested rewrite for the LACAL, I've wrote this for Master of the Legion (note that I've updated the AoD rules for 7th edition, so detachments (as well as made some suggestions for Legion specific Warlord tables, limited to D3 (Primarchs obviously getting all 3).

 


The full panoply... blah blah... When deciding the tactics of the Legion's warfighting ability

 

A Legiones Astartes Crusade Army List Detachment may take no more than a single model with the Master of the Legion special rule per full 1000 points in that detachment. Such a model must always be the Warlord for the army (if there are multiple models with this rule, the owning player may decide which model becomes the Warlord). Such models may take a single unit with the Retinue special rule as part of the same Force Organization slot. Note that the Master of the Legion is still an Independent Character, and may deploy as normal for an Independent Character.

In addition, Masters of the Legion, when rolling for their Trait may choose to roll an extra dice when deciding their Warlord trait on their chosen traits chart and choose which trait to apply; alternatively, they may select a single trait from their own Legion Warlord Table.

Finally, each detachment containing one or more models with Master of the Legion special rule may apply a Rite of War to it. Each Rite of War is typically a modification to the number of Force Organization Slots to a particular detachment, but also has some other rules and limitations (including new Special rules, changes to battlefield role, etc) which apply only to the detachment it is taken for, unless specified. Provided you meet all the limitations and prerequisites of the Rite of War you select, this is chosen before deployment, but after determining Warlord Traits.

 

In addition, changes to Jealous Command (Only one model with this rule per Army. Precludes other Masters of the Legion from the same faction, and must be Warlord; even over other Masters of the Legion) and Primarch (requires 2000pts of their faction in the army, (weak Corax avoids that) models of their faction lose Masters of the Legion and all models in the army lose Jealous Command. Must be Warlord, gets to select which Warlord trait in addition to knowing all of those on their Legion specific; Fulgrim gets 2 choices on Strategic Table). Must be Warlord, above all but other Primarchs; can choose between Primarchs (except Angron who forces an opposed Ld test, to see if he becomes Warlord if not already, or pass it off to another Primarch if already Warlord).

technically now centurions can take ROW's with those two new FW event only characters, and the new Introduced Centurion rules and the new ROW's that come with them. Might have misread that though.

Only the Centurion-Delegatus can take a RoW and the RoW he comes with is unique to him alone. He is very much the sole exception to the rule.

technically now centurions can take ROW's with those two new FW event only characters, and the new Introduced Centurion rules and the new ROW's that come with them. Might have misread that though.

Only one of them, it's a 25 point consul upgrade and gives access to a unique RoW along with the rest.

 

technically now centurions can take ROW's with those two new FW event only characters, and the new Introduced Centurion rules and the new ROW's that come with them. Might have misread that though.

Only the Centurion-Delegatus can take a RoW and the RoW he comes with is unique to him alone. He is very much the sole exception to the rule.

 

 

 

technically now centurions can take ROW's with those two new FW event only characters, and the new Introduced Centurion rules and the new ROW's that come with them. Might have misread that though.

Only one of them, it's a 25 point consul upgrade and gives access to a unique RoW along with all the rest of them.

 

Yeah, I knew there was a centurion/s who could take one, just didn't know which one (read: to tired to go scrawling back through the 32 pages of heresy weekender stuff)

Warlord isnt actually a rule; its a model you nominate to act as your armies 'Warlord' - the caveat being that the model selected be a Character. So a Centurion being nominated Warlord does not confer a 'Warlord' USR.

 

Master of The Legion is also a Specific Special Rule in and of itself and is not conferred to anyone - it is listed in their profile if they have it. If they don't, there is no way for them to get it.

 

Case and point, the new Delegatus Consul from the FW Weekender that just happened: It has a special rule that permits it to select a RoW as if it had 'Master Of The Legion' but does not actually have the rule on it profile.

 

There is no real ambiguity here. Read page 124 of the BRB.

Because Slip said it best.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.