Morticon Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 (reading over and over again, actually unsure). I think its one of those few times its genuinely ambiguous. (as opposed to poorly read) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodTzar Posted August 19, 2014 Author Share Posted August 19, 2014 Yes that was exactly my problem, it has quite vague wording, have written to FW hope they will get more light into this :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morticon Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Will message them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morticon Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Weird, wait...so...with the wording on the legacies...can we even take them on vehicles not listed in the Codex? ie: the vehicles in the actual IA book itself!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Of course we can :) Just like Rapier crew benefit from Priest buffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodTzar Posted August 19, 2014 Author Share Posted August 19, 2014 Guys I have another question regarding the 7th ed; Chars in allies transports; A) can Meph ride allied SW DP? B) can allied libby ride with our sterns in DP? C) can draigo ride with tacticals in DP? D) can Meph ride DP with some sq? Thank you very much it is very confusing for me, I have seen bat reps where almost all of above mentioned have been used ( not A). ~BT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morticon Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 A: yes. (provided its the fast attack pod) B: yes. C: Yes. D: No. He can however ride in a SW (FA) pod with other ICs that join him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodTzar Posted August 20, 2014 Author Share Posted August 20, 2014 Thank you ! I am still on half way to 7th ed :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangamarine Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 I can also vouch for the Sicaran, I ran it in a tournament with shishm of mars and side sponsons. However half the time the side lascannons didn't do all the much, and force you to slow down so you don't snap shot. If you are light on AA the Battle of Sarosh just wreaks a flyer the instant it comes in. I have been tempted to drop the lascannons and add a monster hunter legacy to it, enabling it to take on MC with a hail of shots (even adding heavy bolters to the side) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaezus Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Which legacy gives monster hunter? Would look into that but I can't keep my eyes of the battle of keylek on my caestus, gives it a whole new offensive dimension. Also a tad wary of pushing the points up too much on a sicaran. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangamarine Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 War of Murder, I believe . I can definitely see how you might enjoy ignoring cover on a large blast like that :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodTzar Posted August 21, 2014 Author Share Posted August 21, 2014 OK clear answer on the relics; Main: 1 = all is ok 2+ need a "keeper" Allies: 1 (if one taken in main) needs a "keeper", however no need to pay relic tax if main has 2+ relics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.