Jump to content

A 'close source' reveals information from the new WD.


Adeptus

Recommended Posts

 

 

 

 

I'm not sure this new formation is worth losing Objective secured. The rules are nice but in my opinion do not justify losing the regular formation rules. Objective secured terminators are just too awesome.

I might have missed something but if we're talking about the nemesis strike force detachment, why would we loose objective secured if we use it? I thought it's a detachment that can be taken as part of a battle forged list? But again, I must admit I don't know these rules as well as I should.
Objective Secured is a benefit of the Combined Arms Detachment (otherwise known as the "normal" FOC), so any troops from it gain objective secured.Personally, I think objective secured is a bit overrated. Of the 20 or so games I've played since 7th was released, I've yet to win/lose a game due to objective secured.
Thanks for the clarification, I thought OS came with being battle forged and not with the detachment :)

On that note, if Inquisition-entries are taken out of our codex now, what happens if I want to run GK as my main detachment (combined arms) and ally with an Inquisitor and retinue. There are no troop choices in the Inquisition codex so it can't follow the allied FOC in the combined arms detachment (min. one HQ and one troop) but it follows the allied detachment in the Inquisition codex (min. one HQ). Do I have to run it as an unbound army or can I keep objective secured for my main detachment?

Codex: Inquisition has a specific Inquisitorial Detachment that consists of 1-2 HQ, and 0-3 Elites (warbands) that can be taken regardless of any Allied Detachments.

Only question remaining then is if it's too cheesy to ally my GK with 1 inquisitor with 3 servitors with heavy plasma, 3 acolytes with plasma guns and 2 psykers and 1 inquisitor with 3 servitors with multi melta, 3 acolytes with meltaguns and 2 psykers... :)

I'm not sure this new formation is worth losing Objective secured. The rules are nice but in my opinion do not justify losing the regular formation rules. Objective secured terminators are just too awesome.

I might have missed something but if we're talking about the nemesis strike force detachment, why would we loose objective secured if we use it? I thought it's a detachment that can be taken as part of a battle forged list? But again, I must admit I don't know these rules as well as I should.

Objective Secured is a benefit of the Combined Arms Detachment (otherwise known as the "normal" FOC), so any troops from it gain objective secured.

Personally, I think objective secured is a bit overrated. Of the 20 or so games I've played since 7th was released, I've yet to win/lose a game due to objective secured.

You're forgetting how much our enemies will hate cheap, OS Terminators though smile.png

Our terminators were 40pts with free CC upgrades. The only thing that's gotten cheaper for them are warding staves by a lot! (I wonder what their ability is now?) and falchions by 1 single point and psycannons by 5 I think?

 

So depending on how you kit them out they are both cheaper and more expensive.

Our terminators were 40pts with free CC upgrades. The only thing that's gotten cheaper for them are warding staves by a lot! (I wonder what their ability is now?) and falchions by 1 single point and psycannons by 5 I think?

 

So depending on how you kit them out they are both cheaper and more expensive.

Leave them with Swords, and they're 7 points cheaper. Upgrade to Halberds, and still 5 points cheaper.

Does not sound much but that could be a free Termie in every 10 or so. I like the sound of that. msn-wink.gif

Indeed.

The struggle of our current codex for me is squeezing in all the other little trinkets while keeping my Terminators in the list. Now they're cheaper, I should be happier. ^-^

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.