Jump to content

Baneblades any good?


bigted

Recommended Posts

Personally, I am not a fan. While the model is great and makes for a great tank to get out now and again, it's performance is lack-luster in my eyes.

Well, its offensive capabilities are fine, however I do not really like investing 500 points in a unit that can be deleted by a single alpha strike consisting of angry combi-melta men and even angrier centurions, all arriving in angry drop pods.

Now, if you can cast Invisibility on it with a rather high reliability, then we can talk. However, only Sevrin Loth and Tigurius are capable of doing that.

Not bloody likely. How often do you face the melta-pods of doom army? It seems like those armies would stink on ice against massed infantry, so they wouldn't be common at all. Anyway, there's a fantastic fix for that. Park your superheavy on top of a skyshield. Now standard meltaguns can't get within 6" without losing LOS, and any shots that do get off are mitigated by a 4++.

I really like my shadowsword in spite of it objectively being too many points in a single model to make sense in an 1850 game...but 5 TLHB, 4 LC, and a D weapon, all of them independently targetable and immune from "Weapon Destroyed" results is nothing to sneeze at. I'm 2-0-1 in games involving the beast...and the draw was the sweetest of all...see, I had three models left at the end of the game while my opponent had lost virtually nothing...the shadowsword blew apart cataclysmically on the bottom of turn five, killing my opponent's relic bearer, whereupon the game promptly ended, denying his hordes of daemons the opportunity to pick it back upbiggrin.png He had linebreaker to my first blood, 1-1 draw in a game in which I was absolutely slaughtered!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.