Prodigal Son of Magnus Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I see it on every forum I visit about how all the primarchs were a bunch of whiny kids and they just needed to grow up, but I really don't see that being the case. Could someone enlighten me as to how they are man-children? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Eremon Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Come on, do you mean to tell me that you have seen Konrad Curze, wearing his panties on his head and running around screaming NIGHT HAUNTER, with a lisp, streams of tears running down his face because nobody was around to say 'there there' when he was a baby and you don't think he came across as a man-child? I suppose you thought Rogal "Stone Men feel no feelings because feelings are hard" Dorn was the height of maturity, then. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902317 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disciple of Caliban Sgt Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Oh come on. Lets be honest. They do act a bit childish (maybe more than a bit) and they all have severe Daddy issues. Plus lets give two big thumbs way way up for the Emperor, the galaxy's biggest deadbeat dad. Edit: And when I say they all have Daddy issues I mean all the Primarch's traitor or loyalist. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902340 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 No Primarch is known for sure to have been raised by the Emperor. Only Horus and maybe Alpharius had contact with him longer than most other Primarchs, and even Alpharius' origins are likely fake stories. Only Horus is known to have had the longest amount of contact with the Emperor. The other Primarchs were all raised by people on their home world, or lived alone into early teenage years. Of those, only Kurze and Ferrus were alone to adulthood. So any 'daddy issues' would come from the people that raised the Primarchs. Some were raised as saviors, like Fulgrim and Corax. Others were raised to be generals and kings, like Dorn, Guilliman, and the Lion. The Emperor created the Primarchs to be generals, and ADB has said he would see them more like that than as biological sons. If a Primarch is vain, it's because he was raised with that flaw by mortal humans. If he is disciplined and honorable, he got that from humans as well. It isn't that the Emperor built the Primarchs with flaws, it's that normal people :cuss them up before they ever met him. Only Kurze willfully chose to be :cuss up. When people talk about Primarchs having normal human emotions turned up to 11, sure. But it wasn't the Emperor that did that, it was normal imperfect people who taught the Primarchs to be imperfect. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902345 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimDim Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 No Primarch is known for sure to have been raised by the Emperor. Only Horus and maybe Alpharius had contact with him longer than most other Primarchs, and even Alpharius' origins are likely fake stories. Only Horus is known to have had the longest amount of contact with the Emperor. The other Primarchs were all raised by people on their home world, or lived alone into early teenage years. Of those, only Kurze and Ferrus were alone to adulthood. So any 'daddy issues' would come from the people that raised the Primarchs. Some were raised as saviors, like Fulgrim and Corax. Others were raised to be generals and kings, like Dorn, Guilliman, and the Lion. The Emperor created the Primarchs to be generals, and ADB has said he would see them more like that than as biological sons. If a Primarch is vain, it's because he was raised with that flaw by mortal humans. If he is disciplined and honorable, he got that from humans as well. It isn't that the Emperor built the Primarchs with flaws, it's that normal people them up before they ever met him. Only Kurze willfully chose to be up. When people talk about Primarchs having normal human emotions turned up to 11, sure. But it wasn't the Emperor that did that, it was normal imperfect people who taught the Primarchs to be imperfect. True dat! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902357 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormborn Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 The primarchs all have massively elevated growth cycles where they seem to have gone from new born to full adult in about 5 minutes, its no wonder they are all screwed up. When did they have time to develop as human beings, they are the ultimate child soldiers. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902375 Share on other sites More sharing options...
helterskelter Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 200 year old man children bear in mind by the heresy. Though there are several instances where some put up or shut up/rational thought would've dealt with the situation sooo much better Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902382 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kol Saresk Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 No Primarch is known for sure to have been raised by the Emperor. Only Horus and maybe Alpharius had contact with him longer than most other Primarchs, and even Alpharius' origins are likely fake stories. Only Horus is known to have had the longest amount of contact with the Emperor. The other Primarchs were all raised by people on their home world, or lived alone into early teenage years. Of those, only Kurze and Ferrus were alone to adulthood. So any 'daddy issues' would come from the people that raised the Primarchs. Some were raised as saviors, like Fulgrim and Corax. Others were raised to be generals and kings, like Dorn, Guilliman, and the Lion. The Emperor created the Primarchs to be generals, and ADB has said he would see them more like that than as biological sons. If a Primarch is vain, it's because he was raised with that flaw by mortal humans. If he is disciplined and honorable, he got that from humans as well. It isn't that the Emperor built the Primarchs with flaws, it's that normal people :cuss them up before they ever met him. Only Kurze willfully chose to be :cuss up. When people talk about Primarchs having normal human emotions turned up to 11, sure. But it wasn't the Emperor that did that, it was normal imperfect people who taught the Primarchs to be imperfect. Actually even Curze is a product of his environment. He learned how to survive by watching people and animals devour corpses of those left for dead in the alleys. And from those corpses, he absorbed genetic memories of how the donor's viewed right and wrong, justice and punishment, law and order. Curze was taught to be who he became by the dead. From there, just throw in some maddening visions of meeting the man he believed would kill him, the literal end of the world and who knows what else, possibly even the Heresy itself, and no wonder he became so unhinged. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902392 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc warhammer Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 No Primarch is known for sure to have been raised by the Emperor. Only Horus and maybe Alpharius had contact with him longer than most other Primarchs, and even Alpharius' origins are likely fake stories. Only Horus is known to have had the longest amount of contact with the Emperor. The other Primarchs were all raised by people on their home world, or lived alone into early teenage years. Of those, only Kurze and Ferrus were alone to adulthood. So any 'daddy issues' would come from the people that raised the Primarchs. Some were raised as saviors, like Fulgrim and Corax. Others were raised to be generals and kings, like Dorn, Guilliman, and the Lion. The Emperor created the Primarchs to be generals, and ADB has said he would see them more like that than as biological sons. If a Primarch is vain, it's because he was raised with that flaw by mortal humans. If he is disciplined and honorable, he got that from humans as well. It isn't that the Emperor built the Primarchs with flaws, it's that normal people them up before they ever met him. Only Kurze willfully chose to be up. When people talk about Primarchs having normal human emotions turned up to 11, sure. But it wasn't the Emperor that did that, it was normal imperfect people who taught the Primarchs to be imperfect. Actually even Curze is a product of his environment. He learned how to survive by watching people and animals devour corpses of those left for dead in the alleys. And from those corpses, he absorbed genetic memories of how the donor's viewed right and wrong, justice and punishment, law and order. Curze was taught to be who he became by the dead. From there, just throw in some maddening visions of meeting the man he believed would kill him, the literal end of the world and who knows what else, possibly even the Heresy itself, and no wonder he became so unhinged. then again, he also reached for a weapon the very second he sprung from his pod before there was any interaction with his environment... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902399 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonite Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 ... Angron isn't a man child. He's just REALLY PISSED from having lost every friend he had and having the Butcher's Nails. Actually, yeah, Angron is the best justified in my opinion. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902542 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Angron and Mortarion have the most plausible downfalls. Both wanted to topple a Tyrant. Angron is the reverse of Rousseau's 'man is everywhere born free, and lives in chains'. He was given real freedom by the Emperor, but was never able to see it as anything but a new master. 'Too spiteful to prosper' in ADBs words. Mortarion has a Moses style Origin story, but instead of liberating the Barbarans, he became a creepy protector. The best part of Conquest was the depiction of the early years of the Age of Darkness as a political revolution, and not a religious one. Angron's political motivations were always the strongest executed in the weakest way possible because he was such a flawed standard bearer. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902547 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fire Golem Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 What is Conquest actually about then, story wise? I thought it was just little battles after Istvaan. Still need to get it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902587 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 It's Horus and Mortarion conquering the Coronid Deeps. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902591 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haywire Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yes, as people have said before, they haven't been able to develop properly as 'humans' are wont to do. Look at our own society. Those who are 'different' or 'freakish' from us are often shoved to one side and forced to grow up in a world of their own. With nobody that they can relate to, they essentially live on their own and so struggle to develop as proper emphatic human beings. As was said earlier, they are essentially this turned up to 11. Imagine what life would have been like for those Primarchs who were raised by humans. Right from the word go, they were seen as special in some form or another. Their rate of growth and their ability to learn was completely unmatched by any of the mortals with which they lived. As 'children', any other children that the Primarchs had as friends would have been left well in the dirt a long time ago. The adult teachers would have seemed a lot like dullards eventually as they outstripped them in intellect and ability. All that these humans could really do was teach values. What they couldn't do, was teach them how to be human and to grow up as healthy individuals. It's only when they start meeting one another that you start seeing them forming relations, but even then, they're still isolated due to rivalries, distance, and the number of them that there are. Not sure how much sense I made there. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902619 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Loss Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 In broader terms, Conquest is an example of what takes place during the conquest of the northern Imperium, and details the events immediately following Isstvan (where every Legion goes etc) and the relationship between Knights & Mechanicum, amongst other things. It's a fantastic book that really shows the scale of the Heresy in a way the first three didn't On topic, I think sometimes they do come across as whiny morons but it's usually poor writing and when done well their excuses seem reasonable enough. The problem is, that we're told about problems/issues that occur over many decades/centuries that change their view of something (EG Emperor, Imperium blabla) but can only be told about it over the course of so many pages, which often simplifies the issue and makes it seem more trivial Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902620 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gree Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I see it on every forum I visit about how all the primarchs were a bunch of whiny kids and they just needed to grow up, but I really don't see that being the case. Could someone enlighten me as to how they are man-children? And what forums would these be then? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902622 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yes, as people have said before, they haven't been able to develop properly as 'humans' are wont to do. Look at our own society. Those who are 'different' or 'freakish' from us are often shoved to one side and forced to grow up in a world of their own. With nobody that they can relate to, they essentially live on their own and so struggle to develop as proper emphatic human beings. As was said earlier, they are essentially this turned up to 11. Imagine what life would have been like for those Primarchs who were raised by humans. Right from the word go, they were seen as special in some form or another. Their rate of growth and their ability to learn was completely unmatched by any of the mortals with which they lived. As 'children', any other children that the Primarchs had as friends would have been left well in the dirt a long time ago. The adult teachers would have seemed a lot like dullards eventually as they outstripped them in intellect and ability. All that these humans could really do was teach values. What they couldn't do, was teach them how to be human and to grow up as healthy individuals. It's only when they start meeting one another that you start seeing them forming relations, but even then, they're still isolated due to rivalries, distance, and the number of them that there are. Not sure how much sense I made there. The Primarchs intellect, strength, and abilities are no different than prodigies in the real world. Relatively speaking, of course. Stephen Hawking, Beethoven, Grotius, Bentham, JS Mill, Einstein, Newton etc all had friends and family. There is no reason to think that Guilliman, as a prodigy, didn't learn empathy from Konor or that Russ wasn't exposed to friendships as a King. Primarchs were not immune to human development, but it brought human flaws with it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902623 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSocks Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Imagine you finally meet the 20 other people in the entire universe that you can related to and being told "Here's a legion of super warriors, split up and go conquer the galaxy for me but I'm going to go home and do something super secret, oh by the way your two brothers have disappeared lets never talk about them again but we'll bring them up from time to time because of reasons and before I go can I tell you all that Horus is my favourite son" And you can kind of see why they weren't all too happy with the arrangement. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902628 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Eremon Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yes, as people have said before, they haven't been able to develop properly as 'humans' are wont to do. Look at our own society. Those who are 'different' or 'freakish' from us are often shoved to one side and forced to grow up in a world of their own. With nobody that they can relate to, they essentially live on their own and so struggle to develop as proper emphatic human beings. As was said earlier, they are essentially this turned up to 11. Imagine what life would have been like for those Primarchs who were raised by humans. Right from the word go, they were seen as special in some form or another. Their rate of growth and their ability to learn was completely unmatched by any of the mortals with which they lived. As 'children', any other children that the Primarchs had as friends would have been left well in the dirt a long time ago. The adult teachers would have seemed a lot like dullards eventually as they outstripped them in intellect and ability. All that these humans could really do was teach values. What they couldn't do, was teach them how to be human and to grow up as healthy individuals. It's only when they start meeting one another that you start seeing them forming relations, but even then, they're still isolated due to rivalries, distance, and the number of them that there are. Not sure how much sense I made there. The Primarchs intellect, strength, and abilities are no different than prodigies in the real world. Relatively speaking, of course. Stephen Hawking, Beethoven, Grotius, Bentham, JS Mill, Einstein, Newton etc all had friends and family. There is no reason to think that Guilliman, as a prodigy, didn't learn empathy from Konor or that Russ wasn't exposed to friendships as a King. Primarchs were not immune to human development, but it brought human flaws with it. Corax had a childhood friend that is now an old woman still in his service, and still seen as a friend. Guilliman has Mamzel Euten. The Lion had Luther. Lorgar has Kor Phaeron. Russ has his warrior brothers. Angron had his gladiator brothers and sisters. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902629 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Did you mean to quote me or Darvell? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902631 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Imagine you finally meet the 20 other people in the entire universe that you can related to and being told "Here's a legion of super warriors, split up and go conquer the galaxy for me but I'm going to go home and do something super secret, oh by the way your two brothers have disappeared lets never talk about them again but we'll bring them up from time to time because of reasons and before I go can I tell you all that Horus is my favourite son" And you can kind of see why they weren't all too happy with the arrangement. That's the 'family' view ADB debunked. Horus was the Emperor's favorite General, not son. The other Primarchs weren't meant to be besties. And the Emperor led them on the field for 200 years before retiring to Terra. In fact, he spent a total of 6 years on Terra opposed to 200 leading the Crusade and 1000 leading the unification wars. The guy earned his pension. It was because normal people taught the Primarchs the Emperor was supposed to be like a father to them, that made them suffer when he turned out to be their commander. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902636 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Eremon Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Did you mean to quote me or Darvell? Both. You said that they should still have been able to forge relationships, and I was providing examples of that. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902639 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSocks Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Imagine you finally meet the 20 other people in the entire universe that you can related to and being told "Here's a legion of super warriors, split up and go conquer the galaxy for me but I'm going to go home and do something super secret, oh by the way your two brothers have disappeared lets never talk about them again but we'll bring them up from time to time because of reasons and before I go can I tell you all that Horus is my favourite son" And you can kind of see why they weren't all too happy with the arrangement. That's the 'family' view ADB debunked. Horus was the Emperor's favorite General, not son. The other Primarchs weren't meant to be besties. And the Emperor led them on the field for 200 years before retiring to Terra. In fact, he spent a total of 6 years on Terra opposed to 200 leading the Crusade and 1000 leading the unification wars. The guy earned his pension. It was because normal people taught the Primarchs the Emperor was supposed to be like a father to them, that made them suffer when he turned out to be their commander. It was tongue in cheek, but difficult to convey over the internet. However yes, but bearing in mind that they were so isolated they were heavily influenced also by the company they kept, usually the high command of their legions (who although trans humans till had the human flaws). Whether they were "supposed" to be brothers or not it's still the only people who could really relate to their situation and be their equal. (Just think of how many trusted advisers are treated throughout the early heresy and you can see why they needed the others more than ever). And whether or not Horus was general or son, "First among equals" which further punched a hole and isolated him. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902640 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hesh Kadesh Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 As was right. Primus Inter Pares has been used in antiquity as a position to encourage bringing out the best in people and to encourage others to be better. It is a military thing. During Royal Marine training they have something called Kings Badgemen, which is the best recruit in each troop, selected from 3-4 shortlisted - when those selected for interview for the badge, they all help out. Maybe that comes from 30 weeks of training with each other, but these guys have fought and formed friendships and enemies among each other for in excess of 50 years (alpharius last found, according to Index Astartes, although now proven incorrect, Nurthene War happened 50 years prior to Heresy), Warmaster should NOT have bothered them as much as it should. It is a like a Special Forces colonel complaining that someone else got promoted to general instead of them. They are still SF guys and get to that job they are best at for no real loss. The only complaint would be those that didn't like Horus - and AFAIK, IIRC, he was if not universally liked, he was at least respected by the notorious rebels of Angron, Curze, Alpharius and Khan, while Lion, Sang, Dorn, Rowboat and Ferrus liked him. And that potential complaint would be less of him being capable rather than jealousy - especially as none of the 4 'rebel' primarchs didn't show interest in high command. I cannot remember what the others thought, but IIRC The Lion was fairly bitter about the appointment - but then he has been bitter about most things. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902689 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fire Golem Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Corax didn't like Horus, after Horus fed his troops through the meat grinder at the battle of Gate 42, but I'm not sure if that was before or after Horus was made Warmaster. Alpahrius did get on well with Horus (not sure if this has been retconned but he spent a fair bit of time with Horus in original fluff before even meeting the Emperor and Horus actually respected his way of fighting. I think Horus was the only Primarch Alpharius got on with). I think the Lion thought it should have been him, he's an excellent tactician, but he lacked people skills. I think most Primarchs were okay with Horus being Warmaster, they were more annoyed by the fact that there was any need for a Warmaster at all, they didn't like that the Emperor was leaving the crusade. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/301090-were-the-traitor-primarchs-really-man-children/#findComment-3902726 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.