Jump to content

Wolf Standard Question


rgr_maddog

Recommended Posts

When taking 2 or more detachments in my army, I can have one GH per detachment bearing a wolf standard, each with a 6 inch +1 attack bubble. Now suppose each standard bearing GH squad from each detachment was in a Rhino flanking a unit of TWC to screen its charge across the board. The six inch bubbles would be emanating from the Rhinos and overlapping the TWC. Would the TWC unit stack the +1 attack bonus from each standard?
Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/302016-wolf-standard-question/
Share on other sites

Does it say one per detachment or one per army? If per detachment, then it would be possible, since nothing is said about it not being able to stack.

If it is one per army, then it won't work :P I do not have the codex with me right now, so can't check it.

I always thought it was one per Army, but no, it's one per detachment. I'm sure I only read it once after first getting the codex, still being new to 7th and not fully understanding the differences between an army, faction, detachment, or formation, and disregarded it until now out of spite for the loss of the old standard.

it does indeed only say "one grey hunter per detachment may take a wolf standard".

you may get some moaning from some people but its perfectly withing what is listed in the codex smile.png

and the wolf standard description also doesnt mention anything about stacking or "to a maximum of.." ... smile.png

I'm goin to call BS on multi stacking WS cheese.

 

I'm pretty sure in general you can't stack bonuses that have the same (type) of source.

 

I know if an opponent tried to pull that on me I'd probably shake his/her hand and concede game and go find someone reasonable to play with.

I'm goin to call BS on multi stacking WS cheese.

 

I'm pretty sure in general you can't stack bonuses that have the same (type) of source.

 

I know if an opponent tried to pull that on me I'd probably shake his/her hand and concede game and go find someone reasonable to play with.

 

 

This isn't remotely as broken as it sounds. You are going to have TWC with potentially up to 9A per model. Wow, great. This still does not fix the issue that the Rhinos transporting the banners can be dealt with turn 1 or, in case of pods, the banners can be killed before TWC can charge. On top of that, TWC are still as fragile to S7 spam as they were with 6A per model.

And finally, this setup requires a lot of mandatory choices. You are going to end up with pretty much only TWC and GH, not exactly a stellar force, especially considering that transports are easily removed.

 

 

++Deleted++

@immusturm

If that's how you like to play...

One man's "clever use of rules" is another (wo)man's lame power gaming cheese.

If your meta would put up with that malarkey, great. I just don't play that way.

Well, I just pointed out that this combo isn't as broken to begin with. Things that really cross my line is rule bending because of exact wording. But I do not see issues with more attacks in melee, especially since melee isn't as strong these days.

Power gaming would look a tad more differently, in my eyes anyway. But still, nobody is forcing you to play anything. You do not like that? Do not play it. but please, do not run around declaring things broken, just because it does not fit your view. Some people enjoy that, so why bother them?

No offense meant, bro. You're cool msn-wink.gif

again, TWC are not a great addition to this build. Best way to go would be a main detachment of non SW and then as many dirt cheap SW allied detachments as possible. A naked WGPL, 5 GHs, and a banner. Plus maybe transports (pods or rhinos). You want to get like +5 or more attacks per model.

again, TWC are not a great addition to this build. Best way to go would be a main detachment of non SW and then as many dirt cheap SW allied detachments as possible. A naked WGPL, 5 GHs, and a banner. Plus maybe transports (pods or rhinos). You want to get like +5 or more attacks per model.

 

Then how are you going to handle Tanks and the linked. With Fists? Fair enough, but then you still have the problem of transportation.

I am kinda just thinking of this as a purely theoretical exercise. Ie how to maximise the effect of stacking grey hunters.

 

 

If you start interjecting with real life concerns then this whole enterprise starts getting pointless pretty quick, hehe. I mean, you need your opponent to agree to play you right? I spotted the 1 per detachment on first reading of the new Dex but disregarded it. Partly because it is so cheesy and partly because I figured there must be a rule invalidating it, given that nobody else jumped on iy.

I dunno, how highly does this register on everyone's cheese-ometer? Say... Ulrik and two grey hunters packs in pods, from separate detachments, with stacking banners.

 

would you feel ashamed fielding something like this? Ie a relatively toned down version? Would you be mad if your opponent was doing it?

I dunno, how highly does this register on everyone's cheese-ometer? Say... Ulrik and two grey hunters packs in pods, from separate detachments, with stacking banners.

 

would you feel ashamed fielding something like this? Ie a relatively toned down version? Would you be mad if your opponent was doing it?

I think I'd feel better about fielding my grey hunters, but yes, also woried about the cheese-ometer.

You have to be within 6" of each Bearer for it to stack. So you need to keep 2-3 tight formations to pull it off. Any one have a Vindicator or multiple pie plates to throw at this blob?

That's one of the many disadvantages, the other being so many points in grey hunters. Add to that 50 (or more) points in standards. I don't think it's very competitive, let alone game-breaking, but thought it might be fun.

It would be hard and expensive to make it work and easy to disrupt with a large ap2/ap3 blast.

 

On the cheap for 2 attachments you need 4 squads and 2 HQs.

 

300 points

Ulrik

Grey Hunters (standard)

Bloodclaws

 

205 points

WGBL

Grey Hunters (standard)

Bloodclaws

 

Running off memory for points. That's bare bones, no transports or power weapons. If you skip Ulrik for a 2nd WGBL you could fit 2 Rhinos and 1 power weapon or 2 specials for around 500. Looks really fragil to me

 

Edit: :cuss phone auto correct

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.