Remus Ventanus. Posted June 9, 2015 Author Share Posted June 9, 2015 So in tempest there is a set of armor called "the mantle of Ultramar"....it says there are only 7 of these suits. Does anyone know of any images of this armor? I don't think their are any. FW will obviously make a model of it right? It says a Praetor model may be equipped with it...I pray Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4079526 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olis Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 So in tempest there is a set of armor called "the mantle of Ultramar"....it says there are only 7 of these suits. Does anyone know of any images of this armor? I don't think their are any. FW will obviously make a model of it right? It says a Praetor model may be equipped with it...I pray Probably not seeing as it's a Legion specific upgrade to artificer armour. I'd be surprised if FW bothered when there are more pressing concerns (like making a model for Crysos Morturg and every other named FW character without a model yet). Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4079534 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 9, 2015 Author Share Posted June 9, 2015 So in tempest there is a set of armor called "the mantle of Ultramar"....it says there are only 7 of these suits. Does anyone know of any images of this armor? I don't think their are any. FW will obviously make a model of it right? It says a Praetor model may be equipped with it...I pray Probably not seeing as it's a Legion specific upgrade to artificer armour. I'd be surprised if FW bothered when there are more pressing concerns (like making a model for Crysos Morturg and every other named FW character without a model yet). This armor pre dates the age of strife....there are only seven suits. It must be made! But id gladly take ventanus. Im praying he is revealed at the Forge world open day in july Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4079539 Share on other sites More sharing options...
apologist Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I'd imagine the mantles of Ultramar will never receive models - from the description, they're essentially unique suits; which would have been altered beyond any recognition to make them fit Astartes. Any artificer armour would work to simulate them, I would suggest. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4080100 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daemon2027 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Mantel of Ultramar will be 30k versions of the 40k centurions :p I love mixing armour marks but then I'm a traitorous dog. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4080245 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuskRaider Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I mix my armour on models. If they're taking part in a campaign of attrition, they'll scavenge whatever they can. Mind you, I've done it maybe a dozen times over a hundred Marines, but it adds character. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081202 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 So i emailed FW asking if its lore accurate to have praetor helms on mk 2 armor and they replied "Hi Sean, you can use MKII armour but the most commonly used armour variant was MKIV (4). thanks again Looks like my vets will have mk 2 plate and praetor helms! Im really happy about this. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081374 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuskRaider Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I was under the impression that most of the Loyalist Legions were severely lacking on the Mk. IV front, thus the reason for producing Mk. V... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081623 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 I was under the impression that most of the Loyalist Legions were severely lacking on the Mk. IV front, thus the reason for producing Mk. V... I think that is still the case. Im going off of the Calth conjunction, when the Ultramarines would have been freshly re supplied. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081626 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olis Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I believe it would be the case after casualties begin occurring - we're still seeing the opening phase of the Heresy in the FW series. Once we move onto the part where the Imperium knows it's at war, then we might see a lack of MkIV plate kicking in. I say 'might', because the lack of MkIV armour is reasonably old fluff at this point and is yet to be reinforced (to my knowledge) by the new iteration of the Heresy. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081638 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fire Golem Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Yeah, I keep saying that the Loyalists didn't have much MkIV because Horus sorted it that the traitors were supplied with it more, but I'm not actually sure where I've got that from so... I might've made it up or it might be old. The UM seem to have quite a bit of MkIV. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081644 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 Yeah, I keep saying that the Loyalists didn't have much MkIV because Horus sorted it that the traitors were supplied with it more, but I'm not actually sure where I've got that from so... I might've made it up or it might be old. The UM seem to have quite a bit of MkIV. I definately had the same thought. Im just a little bummed because while i love mk 4, mk 2 is my favorite. Now, that being said there were still many suits of mk 2 being used in the XIII during Calth. Also, I think the newest chapters got most of the mk 4 right? My army is based of the 4th company, so perhaps they had more mk 2 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081664 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 These threads always ruffle my feathers. Your armor marks during the Horus Heresy reflect the mission of your particular company. For instance, my own Fists are all in Mark 3 plate and Cataphractii armor, because they are a shock infantry formation tasked with guarding the Imperial Palace. The Horus Heresy was a transitionary period in which the older two models of armor (Mark 2, the line armor and Mark 3, the assault armor) were being phased out in favor of mark 4 (the new line armor). The same way the army has adopted new uniforms, and the transition dates to the new pattern are something like 5 years down the road, so too would mark 2 and 3 have a shelf life in favor of mark 4. The only reason mark 5 exists as a class is because it's a temporary mark that would be obsolete with the full transition to mark 4. Mark 6 is a specialist armor which would be given to specialist formations. The Horus Heresy dramatically changed the logistical capacity and need for the staged armor transition, and with the loss of so much production capability that would never be regained, you end up with the weird mish mash of armor during the Heresy, and ultimately this is solved by the far less robust, mass model Mark VII. By the 41st millennia they can barely produce enough armor, so you have units walking around with different parts. Your armor mark is tied directly to the hardware and software of the Armors 'spirit'. You can have a helmet that looks nothing like mark 4 still be mark 4, if it uses the mark 4 system. If that makes sense. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081736 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 These threads always ruffle my feathers. Your armor marks during the Horus Heresy reflect the mission of your particular company. For instance, my own Fists are all in Mark 3 plate and Cataphractii armor, because they are a shock infantry formation tasked with guarding the Imperial Palace. The Horus Heresy was a transitionary period in which the older two models of armor (Mark 2, the line armor and Mark 3, the assault armor) were being phased out in favor of mark 4 (the new line armor). The same way the army has adopted new uniforms, and the transition dates to the new pattern are something like 5 years down the road, so too would mark 2 and 3 have a shelf life in favor of mark 4. The only reason mark 5 exists as a class is because it's a temporary mark that would be obsolete with the full transition to mark 4. Mark 6 is a specialist armor which would be given to specialist formations. The Horus Heresy dramatically changed the logistical capacity and need for the staged armor transition, and with the loss of so much production capability that would never be regained, you end up with the weird mish mash of armor during the Heresy, and ultimately this is solved by the far less robust, mass model Mark VII. By the 41st millennia they can barely produce enough armor, so you have units walking around with different parts. Your armor mark is tied directly to the hardware and software of the Armors 'spirit'. You can have a helmet that looks nothing like mark 4 still be mark 4, if it uses the mark 4 system. If that makes sense. Didnt mean to annoy or upset anyone with this thread. Sorry if it is not appropriate. I want to be an asset to this forum so any feedback is welcome Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081761 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I'm just saying the way power armor is spoken about by the studio is asinine and corrupts how people think it would actually work. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081765 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 I'm just saying the way power armor is spoken about by the studio is asinine and corrupts how people think it would actually work. Im just glad im allowed to use praetor helms on mk 2 armor. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081776 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyaenidae Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Mix and match it all. Nothing is sacred. This is The War, and needs must. You didn't ask an inappropriate question, brother. What our zealous brother of the VII Legion meant is the strange way FW decided to present models in one fashion, then their artwork in a different way. Many of the art pieces in the FW HH books present models with plate already mixed up. Heck, if you look closely at the SoH Reaver squads unique plate, you'll notice that their plate is a mix of Mk II, III, IV, and V. No kiddin', take a look. But then, their fluff doesn't match what they present visually. Strange, to be sure. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081828 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 Mix and match it all. Nothing is sacred. This is The War, and needs must. You didn't ask an inappropriate question, brother. What our zealous brother of the VII Legion meant is the strange way FW decided to present models in one fashion, then their artwork in a different way. Many of the art pieces in the FW HH books present models with plate already mixed up. Heck, if you look closely at the SoH Reaver squads unique plate, you'll notice that their plate is a mix of Mk II, III, IV, and V. No kiddin', take a look. But then, their fluff doesn't match what they present visually. Strange, to be sure. Thats what is confuzing to me..... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081832 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyaenidae Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Don't let it be. Approach this as your Legion would, pragmatically. A parade appearance is fitting for war in the eyes of the XIII, but if armour plate of specific design is in short supply, then needs must. Theoretical and Practical, Brother. You know the lessons of your Father, simply follow them. :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081839 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus Ventanus. Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 Don't let it be. Approach this as your Legion would, pragmatically. A parade appearance is fitting for war in the eyes of the XIII, but if armour plate of specific design is in short supply, then needs must. Theoretical and Practical, Brother. You know the lessons of your Father, simply follow them. I think this is why i should base my force on the underworld war. It provides alot more customization. Now i can use mk 3 legs and mk 2 torsos..... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4081848 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuskRaider Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I'll slap together any leftover armour parts I have to make Marines. Body count is more important than cohesive appearance, especially on the battlefields of the 31st Millennium. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4083465 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronotonic Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 That is what I did I had ten mk iv torsos and no legs Used my legs I got off eBay for my mk22 armour to fill the bodies not that squad will have a few legions in it as an ad hoc squad Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4083772 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olis Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 I'll slap together any leftover armour parts I have to make Marines. Body count is more important than cohesive appearance, especially on the battlefields of the 31st Millennium. I'm creating a pool of bitz for my next project after my Fists, making sure that the good body count will have some variety in it. Got a halfway decent collection going but I'm sorely lacking legs... Meh. I'll cross that bridge when I get to it. :P Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4084128 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 I've been collecting a mixture of MkII, MkIV and third-party bits in my spare time to put together some pre-Heresy and post-Heresy/40k Thousand Sons. Judging by the artwork shown they seem to have a bizarre mixture of various different armour marks as it is, not to mention the variants they produce themselves. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4084154 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaeron Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 Mix and match it all. Nothing is sacred. This is The War, and needs must. And, I think this is visually the most pleasing! I'm definitely a MKII-IV man for my Death Guard - and I like the variation, but still that similar design. Go for whatever suits you! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/308911-mixing-armor-mks/page/2/#findComment-4084162 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.